Jonnie B Dunne, Hendrik Rathjens, Michael Winchell, Scott Teed, Max Feken, Tony Burd, Richard Brain
{"title":"Automated Probabilistic Spatial Co-Occurrence Assessments for Aquatic Endangered Species.","authors":"Jonnie B Dunne, Hendrik Rathjens, Michael Winchell, Scott Teed, Max Feken, Tony Burd, Richard Brain","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency must evaluate potential impacts on federally listed threatened and endangered species during the course of pesticide registration. However, current deterministic methods for analyzing geospatial co-occurrence between listed species and pesticide applications do not account for spatial and temporal variability. To address this challenge, we developed the Automated Probabilistic Co-Occurrence Assessment Tool (APCOAT). Using APCOAT, we modeled potential co-occurrence between atrazine applied to corn and aquatic habitats across the continental U.S. by developing habitat models for 375 species in flowing waters and 130 species in static waters. The species habitat models showed high predictive power (70-99% accuracy, median 98%) while maintaining parsimony (median 9 environmental variables). Analysis of both local watershed and upstream pesticide transport revealed that 70% of habitat-pesticide combinations had <5% co-occurrence probability, 25% showed 5-10%, and 5% exceeded 10%. The probabilistic approach provides more refined estimates of both species habitat extent and pesticide usage patterns compared to deterministic methods. These spatially explicit models of species distributions and pesticide application patterns provide valuable tools individually, while their combination enables nuanced probabilistic co-occurrence assessment. The methods and results demonstrate how incorporating probability and uncertainty can improve both species conservation planning and regulatory decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The US Environmental Protection Agency must evaluate potential impacts on federally listed threatened and endangered species during the course of pesticide registration. However, current deterministic methods for analyzing geospatial co-occurrence between listed species and pesticide applications do not account for spatial and temporal variability. To address this challenge, we developed the Automated Probabilistic Co-Occurrence Assessment Tool (APCOAT). Using APCOAT, we modeled potential co-occurrence between atrazine applied to corn and aquatic habitats across the continental U.S. by developing habitat models for 375 species in flowing waters and 130 species in static waters. The species habitat models showed high predictive power (70-99% accuracy, median 98%) while maintaining parsimony (median 9 environmental variables). Analysis of both local watershed and upstream pesticide transport revealed that 70% of habitat-pesticide combinations had <5% co-occurrence probability, 25% showed 5-10%, and 5% exceeded 10%. The probabilistic approach provides more refined estimates of both species habitat extent and pesticide usage patterns compared to deterministic methods. These spatially explicit models of species distributions and pesticide application patterns provide valuable tools individually, while their combination enables nuanced probabilistic co-occurrence assessment. The methods and results demonstrate how incorporating probability and uncertainty can improve both species conservation planning and regulatory decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.