Intraoperative hemodynamic imbalance quantification: clinical validation of heart rate to mean blood pressure ratio in predicting myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuanjun Zhou, Weiming Chen, Fei Liang, Liping Zhong, Yilin Liao, Yuting Zhong
{"title":"Intraoperative hemodynamic imbalance quantification: clinical validation of heart rate to mean blood pressure ratio in predicting myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.","authors":"Yuanjun Zhou, Weiming Chen, Fei Liang, Liping Zhong, Yilin Liao, Yuting Zhong","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04650-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of isolated heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) on myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) have been investigated, but the combined impact of intraoperative HR and MBP remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the influence of the heart rate-mean arterial pressure ratio (HMR) on MINS to optimize hemodynamic management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent general anesthesia and postoperative troponin measurements at Meizhou People's Hospital. The primary exposure was the time-weighted area above the HMR threshold (1.0) (TWAAT-HMR > 1.0), and the primary outcome was MINS within one postoperative day. The diagnostic performance of TWAAT-HMR > 1.0, the time-weighted area under MBP < 60 mmHg, and the time-weighted area above HR > 100 bpm was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Logistic regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to assess the association between HMR and MINS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness of the findings, and subgroup analyses examined potential interactions with age, sex, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 699 patients, the incidence of MINS was 9.4%. TWAAT-HMR > 1.0 demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for MINS compared to time-weighted areas under/above MBP and HR (AUC: 0.708 vs. 0.646 and 0.640, respectively). TWAAT-HMR > 1.0 was identified as an independent risk factor for MINS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-2.17, p < 0.001). RCS analysis showed a linear increase in MINS risk with rising HMR (p for non-linearity = 0.507). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses supported the primary findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated HMR is associated with a higher risk of MINS in adults undergoing general anesthesia. HMR monitoring may serve as a valuable parameter for optimizing perioperative hemodynamic management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04650-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effects of isolated heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) on myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) have been investigated, but the combined impact of intraoperative HR and MBP remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the influence of the heart rate-mean arterial pressure ratio (HMR) on MINS to optimize hemodynamic management.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent general anesthesia and postoperative troponin measurements at Meizhou People's Hospital. The primary exposure was the time-weighted area above the HMR threshold (1.0) (TWAAT-HMR > 1.0), and the primary outcome was MINS within one postoperative day. The diagnostic performance of TWAAT-HMR > 1.0, the time-weighted area under MBP < 60 mmHg, and the time-weighted area above HR > 100 bpm was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Logistic regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to assess the association between HMR and MINS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness of the findings, and subgroup analyses examined potential interactions with age, sex, and body mass index.

Results: Among 699 patients, the incidence of MINS was 9.4%. TWAAT-HMR > 1.0 demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for MINS compared to time-weighted areas under/above MBP and HR (AUC: 0.708 vs. 0.646 and 0.640, respectively). TWAAT-HMR > 1.0 was identified as an independent risk factor for MINS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-2.17, p < 0.001). RCS analysis showed a linear increase in MINS risk with rising HMR (p for non-linearity = 0.507). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses supported the primary findings.

Conclusion: Elevated HMR is associated with a higher risk of MINS in adults undergoing general anesthesia. HMR monitoring may serve as a valuable parameter for optimizing perioperative hemodynamic management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信