Timing of diagnostic workups in Chinese population with recurrent pregnancy loss: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Liyang Zhang, Yushu Du, Jingshuang Zhou, Chuanyang Liu, Jiapo Li, Chong Qiao
{"title":"Timing of diagnostic workups in Chinese population with recurrent pregnancy loss: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Liyang Zhang, Yushu Du, Jingshuang Zhou, Chuanyang Liu, Jiapo Li, Chong Qiao","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07330-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no specific guidelines regarding the definition, diagnostic workup and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in China at present. Whether the diagnostic workup should occur after two or three or more pregnancy losses in the Chinese population is not clear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study collected data from January 2017 to December 2022 from the RPL Clinic at Shengjing Hospital, affiliated with China Medical University. The results of diagnostic tests for evidence-based and possible risk factors of RPL,which is defined as two or more failed clinical pregnancies, were collected. The data collected include parental chromosomal karyotypes, immune factors (anticardiolipin antibody, anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody, lupus anticoagulants, and antinuclear antibodies), endocrine factors (polycystic ovary syndrome, thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia, obesity, and glucose abnormalities), anatomical factors (uterine malformations, endometrial polyps, intrauterine adhesions, uterine fibroids or adenomyosis), coagulation factors (thrombelastogram, antithrombin III, and homocysteine levels) and other factors (vitamin D levels, MTHFR polymorphisms and ultrasound indices of endometrial receptivity). All these data were compared between patients with two or three or more pregnancy losses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all 785 patients with RPL, the rates of abnormal anatomical factors (40.96% versus 32.94%, P = 0.021, OR 1.41, (95% Cl 1.05-1.89)), endometrial polyps (6.21% versus 3.06%, P = 0.034, OR 2.10, (95% Cl 1.04-4.23)) and obesity (13.76% versus 5.59%, P < 0.0001, OR 2.69, (95% Cl 1.62-4.49)) were significantly higher in people with three or more pregnancy losses than in people with two pregnancy losses. The rates of other diagnostic tests were not statistically significant between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the high rate of abnormal test results in the Chinese RPL population, our findings may provide evidence for patients in our area begin routine etiological screening after two pregnancy losses.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03561766, 18/5/2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07330-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no specific guidelines regarding the definition, diagnostic workup and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in China at present. Whether the diagnostic workup should occur after two or three or more pregnancy losses in the Chinese population is not clear.

Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data from January 2017 to December 2022 from the RPL Clinic at Shengjing Hospital, affiliated with China Medical University. The results of diagnostic tests for evidence-based and possible risk factors of RPL,which is defined as two or more failed clinical pregnancies, were collected. The data collected include parental chromosomal karyotypes, immune factors (anticardiolipin antibody, anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody, lupus anticoagulants, and antinuclear antibodies), endocrine factors (polycystic ovary syndrome, thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia, obesity, and glucose abnormalities), anatomical factors (uterine malformations, endometrial polyps, intrauterine adhesions, uterine fibroids or adenomyosis), coagulation factors (thrombelastogram, antithrombin III, and homocysteine levels) and other factors (vitamin D levels, MTHFR polymorphisms and ultrasound indices of endometrial receptivity). All these data were compared between patients with two or three or more pregnancy losses.

Results: Among all 785 patients with RPL, the rates of abnormal anatomical factors (40.96% versus 32.94%, P = 0.021, OR 1.41, (95% Cl 1.05-1.89)), endometrial polyps (6.21% versus 3.06%, P = 0.034, OR 2.10, (95% Cl 1.04-4.23)) and obesity (13.76% versus 5.59%, P < 0.0001, OR 2.69, (95% Cl 1.62-4.49)) were significantly higher in people with three or more pregnancy losses than in people with two pregnancy losses. The rates of other diagnostic tests were not statistically significant between the two groups.

Conclusion: Based on the high rate of abnormal test results in the Chinese RPL population, our findings may provide evidence for patients in our area begin routine etiological screening after two pregnancy losses.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03561766, 18/5/2018.

中国复发性妊娠丢失人群诊断检查的时机:一项横断面研究。
背景:中国目前还没有关于复发性妊娠(RPL)的定义、诊断和治疗的具体指南。在中国人群中,是否应在两次或三次或更多次妊娠失败后进行诊断工作尚不明确:本横断面研究收集了中国医科大学附属盛京医院RPL门诊2017年1月至2022年12月的数据。收集了RPL(指两次或两次以上临床妊娠失败)循证和可能风险因素的诊断检查结果。收集的数据包括父母染色体核型、免疫因素(抗心磷脂抗体、抗β2-糖蛋白 I 抗体、狼疮抗凝物和抗核抗体)、内分泌因素(多囊卵巢综合征、甲状腺功能障碍、高催乳素血症、肥胖和血糖异常)、解剖因素(子宫畸形、子宫内膜息肉、宫腔粘连、子宫肌瘤或腺肌症)、凝血因素(血栓弹力图、抗凝血酶 III 和同型半胱氨酸水平)及其他因素(维生素 D 水平、MTHFR 多态性和子宫内膜接受性超声指数)。所有这些数据都与两次或三次或三次以上妊娠失败的患者进行了比较:在所有 785 名 RPL 患者中,解剖因素异常率(40.96% 对 32.94%,P = 0.021,OR 1.41,(95% Cl 1.05-1.89))、子宫内膜息肉率(6.21% 对 3.06%,P = 0.034,OR 2.10,(95% Cl 1.04-4.23))和肥胖率(13.76% 对 5.59%,P基于中国RPL人群中检测结果异常率较高,我们的研究结果可能为本地区患者在两次妊娠失败后开始常规病因筛查提供了证据:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03561766, 18/5/2018.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信