Validity and reliability of Household Disinfectants-Cleaners Questionnaire (HDCQ) to investigate public awareness and performance in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mona Aridi, Elgenaid Hamadain, Wissam Ghach, Nisreen Alwan
{"title":"Validity and reliability of Household Disinfectants-Cleaners Questionnaire (HDCQ) to investigate public awareness and performance in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.","authors":"Mona Aridi, Elgenaid Hamadain, Wissam Ghach, Nisreen Alwan","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-22317-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although household disinfectant cleaners are used at home frequently, less research has focused on standardized assessment tools to measure public awareness and precautions in practice, especially during health crises. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the important role of household disinfectants-cleaners in preventing infections. However, poor public awareness and unsafe practices can undermine their effectiveness. This study indirectly addresses this lack by developing and validating the Household Disinfectants-Cleaners Questionnaire (HDCQ), to make available an evidence-based comprehensive tool to support future assessments, public health research, and policy development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the validity and reliability of a questionnaire designed to measure public awareness and performance regarding the safe use of household disinfectants-cleaners in Abu Dhabi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional Google survey, involving a sample of 750 Abu Dhabi residents, was analyzed using IBM-SPSS (Version 27.0) and RStudio (Version 1.1.456, Inc., 2009-2018). Validity tests included face, content, and construct evaluations by nine academic experts based on seven parameters. Reliability was assessed through Cronbach's alpha and inter-item correlation. Principal Factor Analysis (PFA), including the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett's test, was conducted for each section in SPSS. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in RStudio identified the underlying factors explaining item covariation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha values for the awareness and performance domains were 0.854 and 0.883, indicating high internal consistency. Expert ratings indicated high face validity, with importance levels ranging from 0.89 to 1.00. The average Content Validity Ratio (CVR) for the questionnaire was 0.95, indicating strong content relevance. The PFA results demonstrated adequate sampling adequacy, with a KMO measure values of 0.879 and 0.891 and Bartlett's test was statistically significant (χ2 = 2,368, P < 0.001) and (χ2 = 3,274, P < 0.001) for each section respectively, confirming factorability and suitability for factor analysis. Both EFA and CFA indicated a good model fit with RMSEA of 0.077 for Sect. 1 and 0.090 for Sect. 2, CFI of 0.990 for Sect. 1 and 0.975 for Sect. 2, and TLI of 0.986 for Sect. 1 and 0.967 for Sect. 2, confirming the robustness of the factor structure and the questionnaire's validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings demonstrate that this questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing public awareness and performance regarding the safe use of household disinfectants-cleaners for future pandemics. Recognizing inherent limitations, detailed in the conclusion section, is essential for effective application in public health contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22317-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although household disinfectant cleaners are used at home frequently, less research has focused on standardized assessment tools to measure public awareness and precautions in practice, especially during health crises. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the important role of household disinfectants-cleaners in preventing infections. However, poor public awareness and unsafe practices can undermine their effectiveness. This study indirectly addresses this lack by developing and validating the Household Disinfectants-Cleaners Questionnaire (HDCQ), to make available an evidence-based comprehensive tool to support future assessments, public health research, and policy development.

Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of a questionnaire designed to measure public awareness and performance regarding the safe use of household disinfectants-cleaners in Abu Dhabi.

Methods: A cross-sectional Google survey, involving a sample of 750 Abu Dhabi residents, was analyzed using IBM-SPSS (Version 27.0) and RStudio (Version 1.1.456, Inc., 2009-2018). Validity tests included face, content, and construct evaluations by nine academic experts based on seven parameters. Reliability was assessed through Cronbach's alpha and inter-item correlation. Principal Factor Analysis (PFA), including the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett's test, was conducted for each section in SPSS. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in RStudio identified the underlying factors explaining item covariation.

Results: Cronbach's alpha values for the awareness and performance domains were 0.854 and 0.883, indicating high internal consistency. Expert ratings indicated high face validity, with importance levels ranging from 0.89 to 1.00. The average Content Validity Ratio (CVR) for the questionnaire was 0.95, indicating strong content relevance. The PFA results demonstrated adequate sampling adequacy, with a KMO measure values of 0.879 and 0.891 and Bartlett's test was statistically significant (χ2 = 2,368, P < 0.001) and (χ2 = 3,274, P < 0.001) for each section respectively, confirming factorability and suitability for factor analysis. Both EFA and CFA indicated a good model fit with RMSEA of 0.077 for Sect. 1 and 0.090 for Sect. 2, CFI of 0.990 for Sect. 1 and 0.975 for Sect. 2, and TLI of 0.986 for Sect. 1 and 0.967 for Sect. 2, confirming the robustness of the factor structure and the questionnaire's validity.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that this questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing public awareness and performance regarding the safe use of household disinfectants-cleaners for future pandemics. Recognizing inherent limitations, detailed in the conclusion section, is essential for effective application in public health contexts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信