Increasing access to psychological therapy on acute mental health wards: staff and patient experiences of a stepped psychological intervention.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Isobel Johnston, Dawn Edge, Paul Wilson, Adele Beinaraviciute, Sandra Bucci, Richard Drake, Gill Gilworth, Gillian Haddock, Fritz Handerer, Sonalia Kaur, Karina Lovell, Helen Morley, Owen Price, Mica Samji, Katherine Berry
{"title":"Increasing access to psychological therapy on acute mental health wards: staff and patient experiences of a stepped psychological intervention.","authors":"Isobel Johnston, Dawn Edge, Paul Wilson, Adele Beinaraviciute, Sandra Bucci, Richard Drake, Gill Gilworth, Gillian Haddock, Fritz Handerer, Sonalia Kaur, Karina Lovell, Helen Morley, Owen Price, Mica Samji, Katherine Berry","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06721-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological therapies are recommended for people with serious mental health problems. However, access is limited, particularly in inpatient mental health settings. The Talk, Understand and Listen in InPatient Settings (TULIPS) study is a large multi-centre cluster-randomised controlled trial which aimed to evaluate a stepped psychological intervention model to increase access to therapies for inpatients. This paper presents findings from the embedded process evaluation focusing on the contextual factors influencing intervention delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two staff and 31 patients from wards receiving the intervention participated in semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Staff and patient data were analysed separately but perspectives were compared and interwoven resulting in five themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients reported sessions with psychologists facilitated greater self-understanding and coping. Staff and patients reflected that formulations improved staff understanding of patient presentations. This understanding was associated with improved staff-patient relationships, more person focused practice and reduced conflict and burnout. Psychologists' frequent physical presence on the wards and support of nursing teams enabled staff buy-in. However, significant barriers in resource, skill and confidence inhibited the delivery of nurse-led interventions within the stepped care model, as did perceptions that intervention delivery was outside the remit of nursing staff's role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence that a stepped psychological intervention on acute mental health wards could improve patient coping and ward experience for patients and staff. Future studies should target nursing staff confidence and skill in the delivery of psychological interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03950388. Registered 15th May 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03950388 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06721-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological therapies are recommended for people with serious mental health problems. However, access is limited, particularly in inpatient mental health settings. The Talk, Understand and Listen in InPatient Settings (TULIPS) study is a large multi-centre cluster-randomised controlled trial which aimed to evaluate a stepped psychological intervention model to increase access to therapies for inpatients. This paper presents findings from the embedded process evaluation focusing on the contextual factors influencing intervention delivery.

Methods: Thirty-two staff and 31 patients from wards receiving the intervention participated in semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Staff and patient data were analysed separately but perspectives were compared and interwoven resulting in five themes.

Results: Patients reported sessions with psychologists facilitated greater self-understanding and coping. Staff and patients reflected that formulations improved staff understanding of patient presentations. This understanding was associated with improved staff-patient relationships, more person focused practice and reduced conflict and burnout. Psychologists' frequent physical presence on the wards and support of nursing teams enabled staff buy-in. However, significant barriers in resource, skill and confidence inhibited the delivery of nurse-led interventions within the stepped care model, as did perceptions that intervention delivery was outside the remit of nursing staff's role.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that a stepped psychological intervention on acute mental health wards could improve patient coping and ward experience for patients and staff. Future studies should target nursing staff confidence and skill in the delivery of psychological interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03950388. Registered 15th May 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03950388 .

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信