Management of fall-risk-increasing drugs in Australian aged care residents: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Catherine Laird, Kylie A Williams, Helen Benson
{"title":"Management of fall-risk-increasing drugs in Australian aged care residents: a retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Catherine Laird, Kylie A Williams, Helen Benson","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05851-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, falls are considered a serious healthcare problem for aged care residents. Fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) are medications that can increase the risk of falling, given their adverse effects. Medication reviews are advocated to identify potentially inappropriate use of FRIDs. However, their impact on clinical and resident-centered outcomes is unclear. This study explored aged care residents' use of FRIDs and the content of medication review reports concerning these.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study of medication review reports completed between 1st July 2021 and 30th June 2022 was conducted. Statistical descriptive analysis was used to examine the use of FRIDs (defined as medications listed in the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk (STOPPFall)). The resident's medicine experience, identified drug-related problems (DRPs), and related recommendations concerning FRIDs were explored via content analysis. For recommendations to deprescribe FRIDs, clinical situations detailed in the reports were compared to those presented in STOPPFall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medication review reports relating to 966 residents were analysed. Of these residents, 83.2% (n = 804) used FRIDs, with 31.2% (n = 301) taking three or more FRIDs. In total, pharmacists made recommendations concerning 2635 identified DRPs, of which 19.7% (n = 520) were the potentially inappropriate use of FRIDs and deprescribing was recommended. The clinical situation for which deprescribing was most frequently recommended was the use of a FRID for an indication of limited clinical benefit 37.9% (n = 197). The clinical situation was not detailed for 130 (25.0%) recommendations to deprescribe FRIDs, and only three reports included the resident's viewpoint on deprescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FRID use was found to be highly prevalent among aged care residents. Pharmacists frequently identified opportunities to deprescribe FRIDs. However, reports often omitted resident viewpoints and the clinical grounds for deprescribing. Using resident-centered communication in medication review reports could improve their impact on FRID use and resident outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05851-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, falls are considered a serious healthcare problem for aged care residents. Fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) are medications that can increase the risk of falling, given their adverse effects. Medication reviews are advocated to identify potentially inappropriate use of FRIDs. However, their impact on clinical and resident-centered outcomes is unclear. This study explored aged care residents' use of FRIDs and the content of medication review reports concerning these.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of medication review reports completed between 1st July 2021 and 30th June 2022 was conducted. Statistical descriptive analysis was used to examine the use of FRIDs (defined as medications listed in the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk (STOPPFall)). The resident's medicine experience, identified drug-related problems (DRPs), and related recommendations concerning FRIDs were explored via content analysis. For recommendations to deprescribe FRIDs, clinical situations detailed in the reports were compared to those presented in STOPPFall.

Results: Medication review reports relating to 966 residents were analysed. Of these residents, 83.2% (n = 804) used FRIDs, with 31.2% (n = 301) taking three or more FRIDs. In total, pharmacists made recommendations concerning 2635 identified DRPs, of which 19.7% (n = 520) were the potentially inappropriate use of FRIDs and deprescribing was recommended. The clinical situation for which deprescribing was most frequently recommended was the use of a FRID for an indication of limited clinical benefit 37.9% (n = 197). The clinical situation was not detailed for 130 (25.0%) recommendations to deprescribe FRIDs, and only three reports included the resident's viewpoint on deprescribing.

Conclusions: FRID use was found to be highly prevalent among aged care residents. Pharmacists frequently identified opportunities to deprescribe FRIDs. However, reports often omitted resident viewpoints and the clinical grounds for deprescribing. Using resident-centered communication in medication review reports could improve their impact on FRID use and resident outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信