Quantifying retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield imaging systems.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Binwei Huang, Chaoxin Zheng, Siyani Chen, Xulong Liao, Haoyu Chen
{"title":"Quantifying retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield imaging systems.","authors":"Binwei Huang, Chaoxin Zheng, Siyani Chen, Xulong Liao, Haoyu Chen","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantitatively investigate the retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging systems.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We imaged the posterior segments of model eyes using Daytona, Mirante, CLARUS 500, VG2001, BMizar and TRC-NW8. We measured the scale bars of each grid and the compactness of each ring to quantify the size and shape distortion. The relationship between the relative size with eccentricity and axial length was analysed. The size and shape distortion were compared among different UWF systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The size is positively associated with eccentricity (β=0.202-0.482; p<0.001) and negatively associated with axial length (β=-0.787 to -0.890; p<0.001) in all UWF systems. There is a significant difference in slopes across devices. The size distortion of Mirante is lower than the other UWF systems (p=0.0083-0.0472) except for TRC-NW8. Multivariate linear regression analysis found the adjusted R<sup>2</sup>=0.809-0.948, which was improved to more than 0.960 with a quadratic polynomial equation. Only Daytona showed shape distortion, and the compactness of Daytona is smaller than the others (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative measurements identified different relationships between size distortion with axial length and eccentricity in different UWF systems, which can serve as a reference for correcting size distortion. Shape distortion only occurs in Daytona.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively investigate the retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging systems.

Methods and analysis: We imaged the posterior segments of model eyes using Daytona, Mirante, CLARUS 500, VG2001, BMizar and TRC-NW8. We measured the scale bars of each grid and the compactness of each ring to quantify the size and shape distortion. The relationship between the relative size with eccentricity and axial length was analysed. The size and shape distortion were compared among different UWF systems.

Results: The size is positively associated with eccentricity (β=0.202-0.482; p<0.001) and negatively associated with axial length (β=-0.787 to -0.890; p<0.001) in all UWF systems. There is a significant difference in slopes across devices. The size distortion of Mirante is lower than the other UWF systems (p=0.0083-0.0472) except for TRC-NW8. Multivariate linear regression analysis found the adjusted R2=0.809-0.948, which was improved to more than 0.960 with a quadratic polynomial equation. Only Daytona showed shape distortion, and the compactness of Daytona is smaller than the others (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Quantitative measurements identified different relationships between size distortion with axial length and eccentricity in different UWF systems, which can serve as a reference for correcting size distortion. Shape distortion only occurs in Daytona.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信