Dual mobility cups reduce dislocation in isolated cup revision.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Tae Woo Kim, Min Uk Do, Kyeong Baek Kim, Jae Jin Kim, Kuen Tak Suh, Won Chul Shin
{"title":"Dual mobility cups reduce dislocation in isolated cup revision.","authors":"Tae Woo Kim, Min Uk Do, Kyeong Baek Kim, Jae Jin Kim, Kuen Tak Suh, Won Chul Shin","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08553-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual-mobility cup (DMC) is gaining increasing attention in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision due to its numerous advantages. However, the prognosis after isolated cup revision with DMC remains unclear. This study aimed to compare complications, focusing on dislocation, and analyze clinical outcomes in patients who underwent isolated cup revision after THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 119 patients who underwent isolated cup revision after THA and were followed up for ≥ 2 years from January 2009 to February 2020. Patient demographics, including age, sex, surgical approach, reasons for previous joint replacement surgery, and postoperative complications, were investigated. The patients were divided into DMC and conventional cup (CC) groups, and operative data and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Clinical outcomes were compared using the Harris hip score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine patients received DMC, and 70 received CC; the two groups had no difference in preoperative evaluation. Although the implants used significantly differed, there was no difference in the cup position. Six patients in the CC group had dislocations, but none had them in the DMC group (p = 0.042). Aseptic loosening was the most frequent postoperative complication but showed no significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DMC in revision THA can prevent dislocation compared to CC. In particular, DMC is considered a good treatment option in isolated cup revision wherein the surgeon can control the limited options.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08553-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual-mobility cup (DMC) is gaining increasing attention in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision due to its numerous advantages. However, the prognosis after isolated cup revision with DMC remains unclear. This study aimed to compare complications, focusing on dislocation, and analyze clinical outcomes in patients who underwent isolated cup revision after THA.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 119 patients who underwent isolated cup revision after THA and were followed up for ≥ 2 years from January 2009 to February 2020. Patient demographics, including age, sex, surgical approach, reasons for previous joint replacement surgery, and postoperative complications, were investigated. The patients were divided into DMC and conventional cup (CC) groups, and operative data and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Clinical outcomes were compared using the Harris hip score.

Results: Forty-nine patients received DMC, and 70 received CC; the two groups had no difference in preoperative evaluation. Although the implants used significantly differed, there was no difference in the cup position. Six patients in the CC group had dislocations, but none had them in the DMC group (p = 0.042). Aseptic loosening was the most frequent postoperative complication but showed no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions: DMC in revision THA can prevent dislocation compared to CC. In particular, DMC is considered a good treatment option in isolated cup revision wherein the surgeon can control the limited options.

双活动杯可减少孤立杯翻修时的脱位。
背景:双活动杯(Dual-mobility cup, DMC)因其众多优点在全髋关节置换术(THA)翻修中越来越受到关注。然而,用DMC进行孤立杯形翻修后的预后仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较髋关节置换术后脱位的并发症,并分析髋关节置换术后孤立杯翻修患者的临床结果。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入119例THA后行隔离杯翻修术的患者,随访时间为2009年1月至2020年2月,随访时间≥2年。调查了患者的人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别、手术入路、既往关节置换手术的原因和术后并发症。将患者分为DMC组和常规杯(CC)组,比较两组的手术资料和术后并发症。临床结果采用Harris髋关节评分进行比较。结果:DMC 49例,CC 70例;两组术前评价无差异。虽然所使用的种植体有显著差异,但在杯的位置上没有差异。CC组有6例脱位,DMC组无脱位(p = 0.042)。无菌性松动是最常见的术后并发症,但两组间无显著差异。结论:与CC相比,DMC在THA翻修中可以预防脱位,特别是在孤立杯翻修中,DMC被认为是一个很好的治疗选择,外科医生可以控制有限的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信