Prevalence of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical samples in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yalewayker Gashaw, Zelalem Asmare, Mitkie Tigabie, Asefa Sisay, Ermias Getatachew, Selamyhun Tadesse, Getachew Bitew, Agenagnew Ashagre, Tadesse Misganaw, Muluken Gashaw, Woldeteklehaymanot Kassahun, Zelalem Dejazimach, Abdu Jemal, Solomon Gedfie, Getinet Kumie, Marye Nigatie, Wagaw Abebe, Atitegeb Abera Kidie, Biruk Beletew Abate, Melese Abate Reta, Baye Gelaw
{"title":"Prevalence of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical samples in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yalewayker Gashaw, Zelalem Asmare, Mitkie Tigabie, Asefa Sisay, Ermias Getatachew, Selamyhun Tadesse, Getachew Bitew, Agenagnew Ashagre, Tadesse Misganaw, Muluken Gashaw, Woldeteklehaymanot Kassahun, Zelalem Dejazimach, Abdu Jemal, Solomon Gedfie, Getinet Kumie, Marye Nigatie, Wagaw Abebe, Atitegeb Abera Kidie, Biruk Beletew Abate, Melese Abate Reta, Baye Gelaw","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-10826-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae poses a significant global threat, particularly in developing countries. Colistin, a critical last-resort treatment for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains, is increasingly facing resistance due to inappropriate use of colistin and the spread of plasmid-mediated resistance genes. Despite the significance of this issue, comprehensive and updated data on colistin resistance in Africa is lacking. Thus, the current study was aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies. Forty-one studies reporting on the prevalence of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from clinical specimens in Africa were included in the analysis. Stata 17 software was used to calculate the pooled prevalence of colistin resistance, employing a random-effects model to determine the event rate of resistance. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test. Subgroup analyses were performed to address any identified heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review analyzed the colistin resistance profile of 9,636 Enterobacteriaceae isolates. The overall pooled prevalence of colistin resistance was 26.74% (95% CI: 16.68-36.80). Subgroup analysis by country revealed significant variability in resistance rates, ranging from 0.5% in Djibouti to 50.95% in South Africa. Species-specific prevalence of colistin resistance was as follows: K. pneumoniae 28.8% (95% CI: 16.64%-41.05%), E. coli 24.5% (95% CI: 11.68%-37.3%), Proteus spp. 50.0% (95% CI: 6.0%-106.03%), and Enterobacter spp. 1.22% (95% CI: -0.5%-3.03%). Analysis based on AST methods revealed significant differences in colistin resistance rates (p = 0.001). The resistance rates varied between 12.60% for the disk diffusion method and 28.0% for the broth microdilution method. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of clinical specimens showed significant variation (p < 0.001) in colistin resistance. Stool specimen isolates had the highest resistance rate at 42.0%, while blood specimen isolates had a much lower resistance rate of 3.58%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is notably high in Africa, with significant variation across countries. This underscores the urgent need for effective antimicrobial stewardship, improved surveillance, and the development of new antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"437"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10826-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae poses a significant global threat, particularly in developing countries. Colistin, a critical last-resort treatment for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains, is increasingly facing resistance due to inappropriate use of colistin and the spread of plasmid-mediated resistance genes. Despite the significance of this issue, comprehensive and updated data on colistin resistance in Africa is lacking. Thus, the current study was aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Africa.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies. Forty-one studies reporting on the prevalence of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from clinical specimens in Africa were included in the analysis. Stata 17 software was used to calculate the pooled prevalence of colistin resistance, employing a random-effects model to determine the event rate of resistance. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test. Subgroup analyses were performed to address any identified heterogeneity.

Results: This systematic review analyzed the colistin resistance profile of 9,636 Enterobacteriaceae isolates. The overall pooled prevalence of colistin resistance was 26.74% (95% CI: 16.68-36.80). Subgroup analysis by country revealed significant variability in resistance rates, ranging from 0.5% in Djibouti to 50.95% in South Africa. Species-specific prevalence of colistin resistance was as follows: K. pneumoniae 28.8% (95% CI: 16.64%-41.05%), E. coli 24.5% (95% CI: 11.68%-37.3%), Proteus spp. 50.0% (95% CI: 6.0%-106.03%), and Enterobacter spp. 1.22% (95% CI: -0.5%-3.03%). Analysis based on AST methods revealed significant differences in colistin resistance rates (p = 0.001). The resistance rates varied between 12.60% for the disk diffusion method and 28.0% for the broth microdilution method. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of clinical specimens showed significant variation (p < 0.001) in colistin resistance. Stool specimen isolates had the highest resistance rate at 42.0%, while blood specimen isolates had a much lower resistance rate of 3.58%.

Conclusions: Colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is notably high in Africa, with significant variation across countries. This underscores the urgent need for effective antimicrobial stewardship, improved surveillance, and the development of new antibiotics.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信