{"title":"Short Term Treatment of Syphilitic Uveitis with Intravitreal Ceftazidime.","authors":"Emily C Davis, Akshay S Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the clinical outcomes of patients with ocular syphilis that were treated in the short-term with intravitreal ceftazidime when definitive treatment with penicillin was delayed due to a variety of extenuating circumstances.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective interventional case series.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>45 patients diagnosed and treated for syphilitic posterior or panuveitis between January 2, 2019, and July 1, 2024, at a tertiary referral private practice. Of these, 10 patients (n = 14 eyes) were treated short-term with intravitreal ceftazidime before initiating penicillin therapy. Three of these patients are presented as cases to highlight factors that might contribute to treatment delays.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>One or more intravitreal injections of 2.25mg/0.1 mL ceftazidime.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Visual acuity (VA), inflammatory grade based on Standardization for Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria, causes for delay in systemic antibiotic treatment, changes in aqueous bacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following ceftazidime administration, changes in multimodal imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following treatment with intravitreal ceftazidime and prior to penicillin treatment, all eyes (n = 14) had improved inflammatory parameters. Of the 9 eyes with measurable baseline Snellen vision, all improved by an average of 5.4 lines (range = + 1-9). In the two eyes of patients for whom aqueous bacterial PCR was initially positive for T. pallidum, subsequent PCR was negative prior to initiation of penicillin. All patients eventually received definitive systemic antibiotic therapy and had resolution of their syphilitic uveitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients experienced improvements in VA and inflammation when treated with intravitreal ceftazidime before the initiation of penicillin, suggesting that ceftazidime could be leveraged in care for those with syphilitic uveitis. With the increasing number of cases of syphilis nationally over the last decade, combined with the growing shortages of penicillin, it is vital to consider adjunctive therapies for treatment of syphilitic uveitis to help improve visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To review the clinical outcomes of patients with ocular syphilis that were treated in the short-term with intravitreal ceftazidime when definitive treatment with penicillin was delayed due to a variety of extenuating circumstances.
Design: Retrospective interventional case series.
Participants: 45 patients diagnosed and treated for syphilitic posterior or panuveitis between January 2, 2019, and July 1, 2024, at a tertiary referral private practice. Of these, 10 patients (n = 14 eyes) were treated short-term with intravitreal ceftazidime before initiating penicillin therapy. Three of these patients are presented as cases to highlight factors that might contribute to treatment delays.
Intervention: One or more intravitreal injections of 2.25mg/0.1 mL ceftazidime.
Main outcome measures: Visual acuity (VA), inflammatory grade based on Standardization for Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria, causes for delay in systemic antibiotic treatment, changes in aqueous bacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following ceftazidime administration, changes in multimodal imaging.
Results: Following treatment with intravitreal ceftazidime and prior to penicillin treatment, all eyes (n = 14) had improved inflammatory parameters. Of the 9 eyes with measurable baseline Snellen vision, all improved by an average of 5.4 lines (range = + 1-9). In the two eyes of patients for whom aqueous bacterial PCR was initially positive for T. pallidum, subsequent PCR was negative prior to initiation of penicillin. All patients eventually received definitive systemic antibiotic therapy and had resolution of their syphilitic uveitis.
Conclusion: Patients experienced improvements in VA and inflammation when treated with intravitreal ceftazidime before the initiation of penicillin, suggesting that ceftazidime could be leveraged in care for those with syphilitic uveitis. With the increasing number of cases of syphilis nationally over the last decade, combined with the growing shortages of penicillin, it is vital to consider adjunctive therapies for treatment of syphilitic uveitis to help improve visual outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.