The Geosiphon-Nostoc symbiosis: recent elaboration, or remnant of an enduring association?

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Matthew P Nelsen, H T Lumbsch, C Kevin Boyce
{"title":"The Geosiphon-Nostoc symbiosis: recent elaboration, or remnant of an enduring association?","authors":"Matthew P Nelsen, H T Lumbsch, C Kevin Boyce","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Fungal associations with photosynthetic microbes have regularly been invoked as precursors to the evolution of land plants and their mycorrhizal associations. The fungus Geosiphon pyriformis (Glomeromycotina) deviates from its arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)-forming relatives through the presence of an intracellular symbiosis with Nostoc cyanobacteria, and is frequently viewed as the only extant representative of an ancient and formerly widespread association between fungi and cyanobacteria that occupied early terrestrial ecosystems. Here we add to growing evidence suggesting the Geosiphon-Nostoc-like associations are not ancestral to AM associations and did not occupy landscapes prior to the evolution of land plants. In addition, we discuss the underlying drivers contributing to the origination and persistence of this argument and discuss other ways in which Geosiphon has been misunderstood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We inferred timescaled phylogenies of Glomeromycotina and utilized ancestral state reconstruction to both evaluate the plausibility of a Geosiphon-like ancestral state, and highlight the additional complexity required to maintain support for a Geosiphon-like ancestral state.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Our analyses overwhelmingly recovered the Geosiphon-like state as being derived from AM associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our work illustrates the diverse ways in which Geosiphon has been misunderstood and adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting the Geosiphon-like ecology is derived from AM-forming ancestors and did not occupy terrestrial ecosystems prior to the evolution of land plants. We conclude by discussing outstanding questions pertaining to the ecology and evolution of Glomeromycotina fungi.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Fungal associations with photosynthetic microbes have regularly been invoked as precursors to the evolution of land plants and their mycorrhizal associations. The fungus Geosiphon pyriformis (Glomeromycotina) deviates from its arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)-forming relatives through the presence of an intracellular symbiosis with Nostoc cyanobacteria, and is frequently viewed as the only extant representative of an ancient and formerly widespread association between fungi and cyanobacteria that occupied early terrestrial ecosystems. Here we add to growing evidence suggesting the Geosiphon-Nostoc-like associations are not ancestral to AM associations and did not occupy landscapes prior to the evolution of land plants. In addition, we discuss the underlying drivers contributing to the origination and persistence of this argument and discuss other ways in which Geosiphon has been misunderstood.

Methods: We inferred timescaled phylogenies of Glomeromycotina and utilized ancestral state reconstruction to both evaluate the plausibility of a Geosiphon-like ancestral state, and highlight the additional complexity required to maintain support for a Geosiphon-like ancestral state.

Key results: Our analyses overwhelmingly recovered the Geosiphon-like state as being derived from AM associations.

Conclusions: Our work illustrates the diverse ways in which Geosiphon has been misunderstood and adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting the Geosiphon-like ecology is derived from AM-forming ancestors and did not occupy terrestrial ecosystems prior to the evolution of land plants. We conclude by discussing outstanding questions pertaining to the ecology and evolution of Glomeromycotina fungi.

Geosiphon-Nostoc共生关系:最近的阐述,还是持久联系的残余?
背景和目的:真菌与光合微生物的关联经常被认为是陆地植物及其菌根关联进化的先驱。真菌Geosiphon pyriformis (Glomeromycotina)通过与Nostoc蓝藻的细胞内共生关系而偏离了其丛枝菌根(AM)形成的亲戚,并且经常被视为真菌和蓝藻之间古老且以前广泛存在的联系的唯一现存代表,这些联系占据了早期陆地生态系统。在这里,我们增加了越来越多的证据,表明geosiphon - nostock -like association不是AM association的祖先,并且在陆地植物进化之前没有占据景观。此外,我们还讨论了导致这一争论产生和持续的潜在驱动因素,并讨论了Geosiphon被误解的其他方式。方法:我们推断了小球菌属的时间尺度系统发育,并利用祖先状态重建来评估类似geosiphon的祖先状态的合理性,并强调了维持类似geosiphon的祖先状态所需的额外复杂性。关键结果:我们的分析压倒性地恢复了geosiphon样状态,因为它来源于AM关联。结论:我们的工作说明了Geosiphon被误解的多种方式,并增加了越来越多的证据,表明类似Geosiphon的生态系统来自am形成的祖先,并且在陆地植物进化之前没有占据陆地生态系统。最后,我们讨论了有关小球菌门真菌的生态学和进化的突出问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信