Comparing outcomes and toxicities among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with daytime versus evening radiotherapy: A retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Kaiqi Lan, Sailan Liu, Suchen Li, Xuesong Sun, Siyi Xie, Guodong Jia, Rui Sun, Haiqiang Mai
{"title":"Comparing outcomes and toxicities among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with daytime versus evening radiotherapy: A retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.","authors":"Kaiqi Lan, Sailan Liu, Suchen Li, Xuesong Sun, Siyi Xie, Guodong Jia, Rui Sun, Haiqiang Mai","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare survival outcomes and acute toxicities between daytime and evening radiotherapy (RT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We enrolled 1351 NPC patients who received definitive RT in the daytime (before 16:00; n = 625) or evening (after 16:00; n = 726) between 2015 and 2016. Optimal cutoff time was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Survival outcomes and toxicities were compared between groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. With a median follow-up of 63 months, evening RT showed better overall survival (OS; p = 0.020), progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.035), and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS; p = 0.037), compared with daytime RT, but not distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.523). Evening RT showed a lower incidence of all-grade dermatitis (59.5% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.002). After PSM, RT time remained an independent prognostic factor for LRFS (HR = 0.601, p = 0.018), OS (HR = 0.643, p = 0.043), and PFS (HR = 0.754, p = 0.040). Subgroup analyses revealed that evening RT improved OS (p = 0.007) and PFS (p = 0.006) in females and LRFS (p = 0.035) in males, with more pronounced benefits in older females (≥45 years; OS: p = 0.027, PFS: p = 0.003) and reduced mucositis in older males (82.9% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.015). Overall, evening RT demonstrated superior survival outcomes and reduced acute toxicities in NPC patients, with distinct benefits across sex and age.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare survival outcomes and acute toxicities between daytime and evening radiotherapy (RT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We enrolled 1351 NPC patients who received definitive RT in the daytime (before 16:00; n = 625) or evening (after 16:00; n = 726) between 2015 and 2016. Optimal cutoff time was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Survival outcomes and toxicities were compared between groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. With a median follow-up of 63 months, evening RT showed better overall survival (OS; p = 0.020), progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.035), and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS; p = 0.037), compared with daytime RT, but not distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.523). Evening RT showed a lower incidence of all-grade dermatitis (59.5% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.002). After PSM, RT time remained an independent prognostic factor for LRFS (HR = 0.601, p = 0.018), OS (HR = 0.643, p = 0.043), and PFS (HR = 0.754, p = 0.040). Subgroup analyses revealed that evening RT improved OS (p = 0.007) and PFS (p = 0.006) in females and LRFS (p = 0.035) in males, with more pronounced benefits in older females (≥45 years; OS: p = 0.027, PFS: p = 0.003) and reduced mucositis in older males (82.9% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.015). Overall, evening RT demonstrated superior survival outcomes and reduced acute toxicities in NPC patients, with distinct benefits across sex and age.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信