Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Achim Langenbucher, Nóra Szentmáry, Jascha Wendelstein, Alan Cayless, Benj Fassbind, Peter Hoffmann
{"title":"Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?","authors":"Achim Langenbucher,&nbsp;Nóra Szentmáry,&nbsp;Jascha Wendelstein,&nbsp;Alan Cayless,&nbsp;Benj Fassbind,&nbsp;Peter Hoffmann","doi":"10.1111/aos.17491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To design a vergence-based lens power formula based on the classical Haigis formula for better outcomes while retaining the original formula architecture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four new formula variants (A–D) incorporating a sum of segments correction for axial length, harmonic mean of corneal radii instead of arithmetic mean (all variants), and differing combinations of lower keratometer index (C, D) and an additional term (a3) representing the lens thickness in the effective lens position (B, D) were assessed in an analysis based on four datasets of IOLMaster 700 biometric data for eyes treated with the Hoya Vivinex lens (dataset 1), Alcon SA60AT lens (2), Johnson &amp; Johnson ZCB00 lens (3), and the Bausch &amp; Lomb MX60 lens (4). All parameters (formula constants and keratometer index) were calculated by nonlinear iterative optimisation techniques for minimising the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE). Performance was assessed in terms of the final RMSPE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All four variants showed reductions in RMSPE ranging from 2.8% to 12.6% over the original Haigis formula. For each of the four datasets, variants B and D (with the additional a3 constant) performed better in this respect than variants A and C. In all four cases, variants C and D (with the adjusted keratometer index) performed slightly better than A and B, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although not amenable to statistical analysis, the % improvements in RMSPE would appear to be clinically relevant. However, the benefit has to be proven in a prospective multicentric study with a large sample size.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"103 5","pages":"e298-e309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aos.17491","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To design a vergence-based lens power formula based on the classical Haigis formula for better outcomes while retaining the original formula architecture.

Methods

Four new formula variants (A–D) incorporating a sum of segments correction for axial length, harmonic mean of corneal radii instead of arithmetic mean (all variants), and differing combinations of lower keratometer index (C, D) and an additional term (a3) representing the lens thickness in the effective lens position (B, D) were assessed in an analysis based on four datasets of IOLMaster 700 biometric data for eyes treated with the Hoya Vivinex lens (dataset 1), Alcon SA60AT lens (2), Johnson & Johnson ZCB00 lens (3), and the Bausch & Lomb MX60 lens (4). All parameters (formula constants and keratometer index) were calculated by nonlinear iterative optimisation techniques for minimising the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE). Performance was assessed in terms of the final RMSPE.

Results

All four variants showed reductions in RMSPE ranging from 2.8% to 12.6% over the original Haigis formula. For each of the four datasets, variants B and D (with the additional a3 constant) performed better in this respect than variants A and C. In all four cases, variants C and D (with the adjusted keratometer index) performed slightly better than A and B, respectively.

Conclusion

Although not amenable to statistical analysis, the % improvements in RMSPE would appear to be clinically relevant. However, the benefit has to be proven in a prospective multicentric study with a large sample size.

Abstract Image

对Haigis公式的考虑:调整后的结果会更好吗?
目的:在保留原有公式结构的基础上,在经典Haigis公式的基础上,设计一种基于收敛度的晶状体功率公式,以达到更好的效果。方法:四种新的公式变体(a -D),包括轴向长度校正的段数总和,角膜半径的协调平均值而不是算术平均值(所有变体),以及较低的角膜度数指数(C, D)和代表有效晶状体位置的晶状体厚度的附加项(a3)的不同组合(B, D),在基于IOLMaster 700生物特征数据的四个数据集的分析中进行了评估,这些数据集用于使用Hoya Vivinex晶状体(数据集1),Alcon SA60AT晶状体(2),Johnson & Johnson ZCB00透镜(3)和Bausch & Lomb MX60透镜(4)。所有参数(公式常数和角度计指数)均通过非线性迭代优化技术计算,以最小化均方根预测误差(RMSPE)。根据最终的RMSPE评估性能。结果:所有四种变体的RMSPE都比原始的Haigis配方降低了2.8%至12.6%。对于四个数据集中的每一个,变体B和D(带有额外的a3常数)在这方面比变体A和C表现得更好。在所有四种情况下,变体C和D(带有调整后的角度数指数)分别比A和B表现得稍好。结论:虽然不符合统计分析,但RMSPE的百分比改善似乎与临床相关。然而,这种益处必须在前瞻性多中心大样本量研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信