Faculty Development for the People: Workplace-Based Solutions for Busy Clinicians

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-03-30 DOI:10.1111/tct.70073
Erica C. Brode, Joey M. Bernal, Susannah B. Cornes, Lekshmi Santhosh, Josette A. Rivera, Shradha A. Kulkarni, Jennifer R. Mandal, Duncan M. Henry, Katherine S. Bartz, Sandrijn M. Van Schaik
{"title":"Faculty Development for the People: Workplace-Based Solutions for Busy Clinicians","authors":"Erica C. Brode,&nbsp;Joey M. Bernal,&nbsp;Susannah B. Cornes,&nbsp;Lekshmi Santhosh,&nbsp;Josette A. Rivera,&nbsp;Shradha A. Kulkarni,&nbsp;Jennifer R. Mandal,&nbsp;Duncan M. Henry,&nbsp;Katherine S. Bartz,&nbsp;Sandrijn M. Van Schaik","doi":"10.1111/tct.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Across clinical learning environments (CLEs), learners often encounter supervising clinicians who do not self-identify as educators and, therefore, may not seek out faculty development to augment their teaching skills. To reach those faculty, we conducted a proof-of-concept project framed by Billet's theory on workplace learning, bringing tailored faculty development to the clinical workplace.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>We recruited 22 faculty champions from 8 clinical departments at our institution, reflecting a broad and diverse range of CLEs. We created core materials for faculty development around feedback skills, which the faculty champions adapted to meet the needs of their individual CLEs. They took a variety of different approaches, including online modules, instructional posters in the OR and brief workshops offered during existing meetings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Between fall 2019 and summer 2022, this faculty development initiative reached a large number of faculty across departments, with the highest participation if activities were embedded in existing meetings. Based on available survey data, faculty satisfaction ratings with the offerings were high, and self-perceived competence increased. Despite successes, we also encountered challenges, including variable uptake dependent on departmental priorities, leadership buy-in and incentives offered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This proof-of-concept project led to ongoing integration of workplace-based faculty development offerings at our institution, where a central ‘hub’ provides a broad array of activities and resources that can be adapted to different contexts (‘spokes’). The lessons learned from this work can inform other institutions in the development and implementation of initiatives aimed at augmenting the reach of faculty development for busy clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Across clinical learning environments (CLEs), learners often encounter supervising clinicians who do not self-identify as educators and, therefore, may not seek out faculty development to augment their teaching skills. To reach those faculty, we conducted a proof-of-concept project framed by Billet's theory on workplace learning, bringing tailored faculty development to the clinical workplace.

Approach

We recruited 22 faculty champions from 8 clinical departments at our institution, reflecting a broad and diverse range of CLEs. We created core materials for faculty development around feedback skills, which the faculty champions adapted to meet the needs of their individual CLEs. They took a variety of different approaches, including online modules, instructional posters in the OR and brief workshops offered during existing meetings.

Evaluation

Between fall 2019 and summer 2022, this faculty development initiative reached a large number of faculty across departments, with the highest participation if activities were embedded in existing meetings. Based on available survey data, faculty satisfaction ratings with the offerings were high, and self-perceived competence increased. Despite successes, we also encountered challenges, including variable uptake dependent on departmental priorities, leadership buy-in and incentives offered.

Implications

This proof-of-concept project led to ongoing integration of workplace-based faculty development offerings at our institution, where a central ‘hub’ provides a broad array of activities and resources that can be adapted to different contexts (‘spokes’). The lessons learned from this work can inform other institutions in the development and implementation of initiatives aimed at augmenting the reach of faculty development for busy clinicians.

教师发展为人民:工作场所为基础的解决方案,繁忙的临床医生
在临床学习环境(cle)中,学习者经常遇到督导临床医生,他们不认为自己是教育者,因此可能不会寻求教师发展来增强他们的教学技能。为了接触到这些教师,我们进行了一个概念验证项目,该项目以Billet的工作场所学习理论为框架,将量身定制的教师发展带到临床工作场所。我们从我们机构的8个临床部门招募了22名教员冠军,反映了广泛和多样化的cle。我们围绕反馈技能为教师发展创建了核心材料,教师的拥护者对这些材料进行了调整,以满足他们个人的需求。他们采取了各种不同的方法,包括在线模块、手术室的教学海报和现有会议期间提供的简短讲习班。在2019年秋季至2022年夏季期间,这一教师发展倡议覆盖了各部门的大量教师,如果活动嵌入到现有会议中,参与率最高。根据现有的调查数据,教师对课程的满意度很高,自我认知能力也有所提高。尽管取得了成功,但我们也遇到了挑战,包括根据部门优先事项的不同,领导的支持和提供的激励措施。这个概念验证项目导致了我们机构基于工作场所的教师发展产品的持续整合,其中一个中央“枢纽”提供了广泛的活动和资源,可以适应不同的环境(“辐条”)。从这项工作中吸取的经验教训可以为其他机构的发展和实施提供信息,旨在为忙碌的临床医生扩大教师发展的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信