Comment on “Unveiling the Transition From Paleolake Lisan to Dead Sea Through the Analysis of Lake Paleoshorelines and Radiometric Dating of Fossil Stromatolites” by Jara-Muñoz et el.

IF 2.9 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
A. Torfstein, S. L. Goldstein, Y. Bartov, M. Stein, Y. Enzel
{"title":"Comment on “Unveiling the Transition From Paleolake Lisan to Dead Sea Through the Analysis of Lake Paleoshorelines and Radiometric Dating of Fossil Stromatolites” by Jara-Muñoz et el.","authors":"A. Torfstein,&nbsp;S. L. Goldstein,&nbsp;Y. Bartov,&nbsp;M. Stein,&nbsp;Y. Enzel","doi":"10.1029/2024GC011972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Jara-Muñoz et al. report a new set of U-Th and <sup>14</sup>C dates obtained from stromatolites scattered along the western slopes of the Dead Sea escarpment and use them to establish a new lake-level curve for part of the last glacial cycle. This curve is fundamentally different from previous reconstructions (Bartov et al., 2002, 2003; Hazan et al., 2005; Lisker et al., 2009; Machlus et al., 2000; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, &amp; Enzel, 2013) and is characterized by very significant vertical uncertainties, which in practice, ignore the millennial-timescale resolution of Lake Lisan dynamics that has been widely discussed before (Bartov et al., 2003; Haase-Schramm et al., 2004; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, &amp; Enzel, 2013), with important implications for understanding regional hydroclimate regimes and linkage to global climate engines. The differences between the new and previous lake-level reconstructions warrant a critical evaluation of the new findings. We argue that rather than strengthening and refining the existing body of observations, the new data have been used separately, resulting in a misleading record.</p>","PeriodicalId":50422,"journal":{"name":"Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GC011972","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GC011972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jara-Muñoz et al. report a new set of U-Th and 14C dates obtained from stromatolites scattered along the western slopes of the Dead Sea escarpment and use them to establish a new lake-level curve for part of the last glacial cycle. This curve is fundamentally different from previous reconstructions (Bartov et al., 2002, 2003; Hazan et al., 2005; Lisker et al., 2009; Machlus et al., 2000; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, & Enzel, 2013) and is characterized by very significant vertical uncertainties, which in practice, ignore the millennial-timescale resolution of Lake Lisan dynamics that has been widely discussed before (Bartov et al., 2003; Haase-Schramm et al., 2004; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, & Enzel, 2013), with important implications for understanding regional hydroclimate regimes and linkage to global climate engines. The differences between the new and previous lake-level reconstructions warrant a critical evaluation of the new findings. We argue that rather than strengthening and refining the existing body of observations, the new data have been used separately, resulting in a misleading record.

评论Jara-Muñoz等人的“通过湖泊古岸线分析和叠层石化石的放射性定年揭示古漓江湖向死海的过渡”一文。
Jara-Muñoz等人报道了一组新的U-Th和14C日期,这些日期来自散落在死海悬崖西坡上的叠层石,并利用它们建立了最后一次冰期的部分湖泊水位曲线。这条曲线与之前的重建有本质的不同(Bartov et al., 2002,2003;Hazan et al., 2005;Lisker et al., 2009;Machlus et al., 2000;托夫斯坦,戈德斯坦,斯坦,&;Enzel, 2013),其特点是具有非常显著的垂直不确定性,这在实践中忽略了之前广泛讨论的湖泊动力学的千年时间尺度分辨率(Bartov et al., 2003;Haase-Schramm et al., 2004;托夫斯坦,戈德斯坦,斯坦,&;Enzel, 2013),这对理解区域水文气候机制以及与全球气候引擎的联系具有重要意义。新的和以前的湖平面重建之间的差异保证了对新发现的批判性评估。我们认为,新的数据被单独使用,导致了误导性的记录,而不是加强和完善现有的观测数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
11.40%
发文量
252
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (G3) publishes research papers on Earth and planetary processes with a focus on understanding the Earth as a system. Observational, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the solid Earth, hydrosphere, atmosphere, biosphere, and solar system at all spatial and temporal scales are welcome. Articles should be of broad interest, and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. Areas of interest for this peer-reviewed journal include, but are not limited to: The physics and chemistry of the Earth, including its structure, composition, physical properties, dynamics, and evolution Principles and applications of geochemical proxies to studies of Earth history The physical properties, composition, and temporal evolution of the Earth''s major reservoirs and the coupling between them The dynamics of geochemical and biogeochemical cycles at all spatial and temporal scales Physical and cosmochemical constraints on the composition, origin, and evolution of the Earth and other terrestrial planets The chemistry and physics of solar system materials that are relevant to the formation, evolution, and current state of the Earth and the planets Advances in modeling, observation, and experimentation that are of widespread interest in the geosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信