Navigating the Intersection of Lasers and the Skin Microbiome: A New Frontier in Esthetic Dermatology

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Diala Haykal, Marco Rocha
{"title":"Navigating the Intersection of Lasers and the Skin Microbiome: A New Frontier in Esthetic Dermatology","authors":"Diala Haykal,&nbsp;Marco Rocha","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advances in esthetic dermatology have increasingly emphasized the role of laser technologies in achieving precise, non-invasive, and highly effective treatments for various skin concerns. Lasers have become a cornerstone of modern dermatological care, offering solutions for conditions such as acne scars, hyperpigmentation, and skin laxity [<span>1</span>]. While the immediate therapeutic benefits of laser treatments are well-documented, a significant gap remains in understanding their broader systemic effects, particularly on the skin microbiome [<span>2</span>]. This oversight is critical because the skin microbiome functions as an integral component of skin health, influencing everything from immune defense to wound healing [<span>3, 4</span>]. By intentionally disrupting the skin's structure to stimulate repair and rejuvenation, laser treatments may inadvertently affect this vital ecosystem [<span>5, 6</span>]. Despite the increasing integration of microbiome research into dermatology, there remains limited direct clinical evidence demonstrating long-term microbiome disruption following laser procedures. While some hypotheses suggest that ablative lasers could alter microbial populations, no large-scale studies confirm an increased risk of infection or impaired healing due to microbiome dysbiosis. Instead, the skin's regenerative mechanisms often restore its microbial equilibrium post-treatment. Nevertheless, understanding how different laser modalities interact with the skin microbiome is an area requiring further investigation to optimize treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes. The question of how to balance therapeutic goals with microbiome preservation is now at the forefront of esthetic medicine. The skin microbiome plays a pivotal role in maintaining immune defense, skin barrier function, and overall dermatological health [<span>7-9</span>]. Recent studies underscore its vulnerability to various interventions, including laser treatments, highlighting the need for microbiome-conscious strategies. This commentary aims to bridge the gap between laser advancements and their impact on the microbiome, underscoring the importance of integrating microbiome-friendly practices into dermatology.</p><p>The skin microbiome operates as a dynamic and adaptive interface between the body and its external environment [<span>10</span>]. Its primary function is to protect the skin from pathogenic invasion by outcompeting harmful microbes and producing antimicrobial peptides. Beyond this, the microbiome also modulates local immune responses, preventing unnecessary inflammation that could damage skin tissues [<span>11</span>]. For example, commensal bacteria like <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and Cutibacterium acnes play critical roles in maintaining skin equilibrium. Cutibacterium acnes also contributes to maintaining the skin's acidic pH by metabolizing sebum triglycerides into short-chain fatty acids, such as propionic acid, which help sustain the acid mantle [<span>12</span>]. This acidic environment is crucial for skin health, as it inhibits pathogen colonization and supports the function of pH-dependent enzymes involved in skin barrier maintenance (Table 1). However, the fragility of this ecosystem is a concern. These organisms can be adversely affected by ablative lasers, necessitating strategies to protect or restore their populations. Incorporating topical probiotics or postbiotics post-procedure can help reinstate microbial balance [<span>13</span>]. Even subtle shifts in microbial composition can lead to dysbiosis, resulting in increased susceptibility to conditions such as atopic dermatitis or rosacea [<span>14</span>]. Environmental stressors, such as pollution, and therapeutic interventions, like lasers, can exacerbate this imbalance. Understanding the microbiome's resilience and thresholds for disruption is essential for developing treatments that respect and preserve this equilibrium [<span>5, 15, 16</span>].</p><p>Laser technologies achieve their effects by delivering energy to targeted chromophores, causing controlled thermal or photomechanical damage. This damage is intended to stimulate processes like collagen remodeling, cellular turnover, or vascular constriction, depending on the laser type and clinical indication [<span>1</span>]. For example, CO<sub>2</sub> lasers ablate the skin's surface, leading to dramatic improvements in texture and tone, but also significantly alter the physical and microbial landscape [<span>17</span>]. Non-ablative lasers, on the other hand, induce sub-epidermal changes without disrupting the skin barrier, making them less likely to perturb microbial populations [<span>18</span>]. Fractional lasers strike a balance by creating microcolumns of injury surrounded by intact tissue, which supports faster recovery but may still affect the local microbiota [<span>19</span>]. The microbial impact of these technologies is largely understudied. Ablative treatments, which remove the protective outer layer of the skin, may expose deeper tissues to opportunistic pathogens, increasing the risk of infection [<span>20</span>]. This disruption creates a temporary void, which opportunistic pathogens like <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> or <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> might exploit [<span>20, 21</span>]. Beyond bacterial populations, the impact of lasers on the skin microbiome may extend to interactions with physiological skin phages. Potential interactions between skin phages and external factors, such as temperature changes induced by laser treatments, are emerging as an area of growing interest [<span>22</span>]. While much focus has traditionally been placed on bacteria within the skin microbiome, the implications of laser treatments on phages and the broader microbiome may be even more significant. Physiological skin phages, particularly those targeting Cutibacterium acnes, play a crucial role in maintaining microbial homeostasis on the skin. These phages help regulate bacterial populations, preventing overgrowth and reducing the risk of inflammation associated with conditions like acne. Dysbiosis of these phages, whether due to an imbalance in their abundance, loss of diversity, or genetic changes, can disrupt this equilibrium, potentially leading to pathogenic bacterial overgrowth and exacerbating inflammatory skin disorders [<span>23</span>].</p><p>By influencing local skin temperature, lasers could impact the activity, replication, and host interactions of bacteriophages. This disruption could affect microbial homeostasis, influencing not only bacterial populations, but also the immune response and skin barrier function. Furthermore, environmental factors such as UV radiation, temperature, and humidity fluctuations are known to influence phage-bacteria interactions, highlighting the importance of exploring how laser-induced temperature changes may impact phage dynamics. Investigating these interactions is crucial to fully understanding the impact of dermatological treatments on the microbiome, ultimately helping to optimize both the safety and efficacy of these procedures [<span>22, 23</span>].</p><p>Non-ablative and fractional modalities, though gentler, could still disrupt microbial habitats, particularly with repeated or high-intensity use. Additionally, the inflammatory response triggered by laser treatments could exacerbate microbial imbalances, especially in patients with pre-existing conditions like rosacea, where inflammation and dysbiosis are already intertwined [<span>24</span>]. By altering skin hydration levels, these treatments may shift microbial communities, favoring certain species over others [<span>25</span>]. For instance, warm and moist conditions post-treatment could encourage the overgrowth of yeast-like fungi, leading to conditions such as pityrosporum folliculitis [<span>26, 27</span>]. This disruption in the skin's barrier and microbial balance can also facilitate the reactivation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) in individuals with a history of the virus. The reactivation of HSV after fractional laser treatment is primarily attributed to the skin's response to thermal and mechanical stress induced by the procedure. Fractional lasers create controlled microthermal zones of injury, which stimulate wound healing and collagen remodeling. However, this disruption of the skin barrier, combined with local inflammation and dysbiosis, could trigger HSV reactivation [<span>28</span>]. Stress-induced immunomodulation, including temporary suppression of local immune defenses, further facilitates viral replication and reactivation. These potential consequences necessitate a deeper understanding of how laser technologies interact with the microbiome at both a cellular and ecological level.</p><p>Different types of dermatological treatments have unique effects on the skin and its microbiome, requiring careful consideration of their mechanisms. When comparing non-laser treatments to lasers, the mechanisms of action and their effects on the skin differ significantly. While lasers target the dermis through controlled thermal injury to stimulate repair and remodeling, non-laser treatments such as chemical peels and injectables primarily affect the skin's surface or localized areas. Chemical peels disrupt the stratum corneum, leading to exfoliation that may temporarily alter microbial diversity [<span>29</span>]. Injectable treatments, on the other hand, can cause localized inflammation, which may indirectly influence the microbiome by altering the skin's microenvironment. Recognizing these differences is crucial for designing treatment protocols that minimize unintended microbial disruption while optimizing therapeutic outcomes [<span>30</span>]. Future individualized protocols, accounting for patient history and skin microbiome conditions, could help prevent such outcomes, even without the use of antiviral medication. While current evidence highlights the potential effects of laser treatments on the skin microbiome, much of this discussion remains largely theoretical due to a lack of long-term, controlled studies.</p><p>Emerging combined technologies that combine lasers with other modalities, such as photobiomodulation, present an exciting avenue for reducing the impact of treatments on the microbiome [<span>31-33</span>]. These combined approaches may allow for lower energy levels while still achieving comparable esthetic results, thereby minimizing the risk of disrupting microbial communities. For example, pairing fractional laser treatments with LED therapy can stimulate collagen production while promoting a favorable microbial environment [<span>34</span>]. While preliminary studies suggest that these combined approaches may help maintain microbial balance, there is currently insufficient clinical evidence to confirm their effectiveness in preventing microbiome disruption. Further investigations, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to validate their long-term impact and establish standardized treatment protocols that incorporate microbiome-friendly techniques.</p><p>Incorporating microbiome-conscious strategies into laser protocols is both a scientific necessity and an ethical imperative. Advances in laser technology have already made it possible to achieve significant esthetic results with reduced invasiveness, but further refinements are needed to minimize collateral damage to the microbiome [<span>10</span>]. One promising approach is the use of non-ablative lasers that deliver sufficient energy to stimulate dermal remodeling without compromising the epidermal barrier. Fractional technologies, particularly those with adjustable parameters, offer another avenue for balancing efficacy with microbiome preservation. Equally important is the timing and frequency of treatments. Overly aggressive protocols can overwhelm the skin's natural repair mechanisms, prolonging dysbiosis and delaying recovery. Spacing sessions appropriately allows the skin's microbial and structural systems to recover fully, reducing the risk of cumulative damage. By tailoring treatments to individual patient profiles, practitioners would further mitigate risks and enhance outcomes [<span>35</span>].</p><p>The recovery phase is a critical window for re-establishing microbial balance and ensuring long-term success. Post-laser care should prioritize products that support the microbiome's natural resilience [<span>36</span>]. For instance, topical probiotics can help recolonize the skin with beneficial bacteria, while prebiotics provide nourishment that encourages their growth [<span>37-39</span>]. Postbiotics, which are metabolic byproducts of microbial activity, offer additional benefits by directly modulating inflammation and promoting skin barrier repair [<span>40, 41</span>]. Equally important is protecting the skin barrier itself. Ceramide-rich moisturizers and occlusive agents can shield the skin from external aggressors while maintaining hydration levels conducive to microbial recovery [<span>42</span>]. Patients should be advised to avoid harsh cleansers, alcohol-based toners, and other products that could further disrupt the microbiome during this vulnerable period [<span>43</span>]. While promising, these strategies require further clinical validation to determine their precise role in post-laser recovery.</p><p>Recent research highlights the potential of lasers to support the skin microbiome when integrated with microbiome-conscious protocols. Fractional lasers, such as fractional CO<sub>2</sub> and Erbium:YAG, create microablative zones of injury surrounded by intact tissue, facilitating faster microbial recolonization. Studies like that of Athanasiou et al. have shown that fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser treatments, when combined with postbiotic-enriched moisturizers, help maintain microbial diversity, reduce dysbiosis, and promote barrier repair [<span>19</span>]. De Sica et al. demonstrated that non-ablative fractional lasers, such as Erbium glass lasers, are particularly advantageous for preserving microbial health induce dermal remodeling without significantly disrupting the epidermal barrier, enabling faster microbial recovery when paired with microbiome-supportive skincare [<span>18</span>]. Manolis et al. found that the use of probiotic-enriched serums following CO<sub>2</sub> laser resurfacing significantly reduced infection risks and accelerated microbial balance restoration [<span>17</span>].</p><p>Further research is needed to optimize these synergistic approaches, focusing on randomized controlled trials to validate their efficacy in maintaining microbial balance.</p><p>Personalized medicine is the future of esthetic care, and microbiome analysis is a key tool in this evolution. By sequencing a patient's microbiome prior to treatment, clinicians can identify vulnerabilities, such as low microbial diversity or the presence of pathogenic species. These insights can inform decisions about laser parameters, post-treatment care, and follow-up schedules, ensuring that interventions are both effective and microbiome friendly. AI-driven diagnostic platforms are making these analyses more accessible. By integrating microbiome data with other dermatological parameters, these tools can generate comprehensive treatment plans tailored to individual needs [<span>44</span>]. This level of precision enhances patient outcomes and sets a new standard for care in esthetic medicine.</p><p>As our understanding of the skin microbiome deepens, its integration into esthetic practices will likely become the norm rather than the exception. Hybrid treatments that combine lasers with microbiome-enhancing therapies, such as LED photobiomodulation, represent one exciting avenue for innovation [<span>5</span>]. Similarly, advancements in biotechnology may soon yield post-treatment products that are specifically designed to support microbial recovery, such as bioactive serums containing live bacteria or their beneficial metabolites. The ultimate goal is to move beyond treating the skin in isolation and adopt a holistic perspective that considers its symbiotic relationship with the microbiome. By doing so, practitioners can achieve results that are esthetically refined yet biologically sustainable, fostering long-term patient satisfaction and trust.</p><p>The effectiveness and safety of laser treatments are significantly influenced by individual patient profiles. Baseline microbiome health is a critical factor in determining how well the skin recovers post-treatment [<span>2, 45</span>]. Patients with a diverse and balanced microbiome may exhibit faster healing and lower susceptibility to infections or dysbiosis compared to those with a compromised microbiome, such as individuals with a history of atopic dermatitis or long-term use of topical antibiotics [<span>46</span>]. Pre-existing conditions like rosacea or acne may also predispose patients to heightened inflammatory responses, necessitating extra care in selecting laser modalities and parameters. Tailoring laser treatments to accommodate these diverse profiles necessitates a comprehensive understanding of patient history, skin type, and underlying conditions, ensuring personalized and effective outcomes [<span>1, 47</span>]. For instance, patients with rosacea may benefit from non-ablative or fractional laser modalities to minimize inflammation, while those with compromised microbiomes might require extended recovery periods between sessions. Incorporating these considerations ensures that laser treatments are effective while minimizing risks, fostering safer and more personalized dermatological care.</p><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into microbiome-conscious laser treatments offers a transformative opportunity to elevate patient safety and therapeutic outcomes while preserving the delicate skin microbiome. By leveraging AI, clinicians can tailor laser protocols with unprecedented precision, optimizing treatment effectiveness and minimizing microbial disruption. AI-driven tools could analyze patient-specific data, including microbiome profiles, skin imaging, and environmental factors, to recommend laser modalities and settings most suited to individual needs [<span>48</span>]. For example, AI algorithms could identify patients at higher risk of laser-induced dysbiosis and adjust energy levels, pulse durations, or cooling parameters to protect microbial diversity. Machine learning models trained on extensive datasets could also predict complications such as infections or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), enabling proactive adjustments during treatment planning [<span>49</span>].</p><p>During laser procedures, real-time AI-enabled monitoring systems could dynamically adjust parameters based on the skin's response. These systems would allow for adaptive treatments that maintain efficacy while minimizing unnecessary damage to the skin barrier and its resident microbiota. Post-treatment, AI-powered diagnostic platforms and wearable devices could track microbial recovery and skin barrier restoration [<span>50</span>]. These tools could provide personalized recommendations, such as microbiome-supportive skincare products or optimal follow-up schedules, ensuring a faster and safer recovery. Moreover, AI-driven analyses could help clinicians refine combined treatment approaches, such as pairing lasers with photobiomodulation, to achieve esthetic goals with reduced microbiome disruption.</p><p>The evolving regulatory landscape for microbiome-conscious laser treatments and AI-driven applications in dermatology presents critical opportunities and challenges. A key consideration lies in the delineation of claims for microbiome-related products. For instance, the distinction between cosmetic and therapeutic claims often determines the regulatory pathway, as seen in the Cosmetics Regulation in Europe and the FDA Cosmetic Labeling Guidelines in the United States [<span>51, 52</span>]. Recent studies have highlighted the need for standardized clinical trials to substantiate claims regarding the efficacy of probiotics and prebiotics in dermatological care. For example, França et al. emphasized the role of probiotics in barrier repair and inflammation modulation, suggesting the necessity for robust clinical validation before market approval [<span>41</span>]. Similarly, Gueniche et al. demonstrated microbiome-supportive product efficacy in enhancing post-laser recovery, underscoring the need for regulatory oversight to ensure product safety and consistency [<span>36</span>].</p><p>The integration of AI in dermatology adds another layer of complexity. The Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) in the European Union proposes a risk-based framework for AI applications, which could impact the development of AI-driven diagnostic tools and predictive models (European Commission, 2024) [<span>51</span>]. Studies such as those by Haykal et al. have demonstrated the transformative potential of AI in tailoring laser treatments to individual microbiome profiles, but these technologies must meet transparency and bias mitigation criteria to ensure equitable outcomes across diverse populations [<span>49</span>]. Regulatory concerns also extend to the ethical use of patient data, as highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO), which advocates for fairness and inclusivity in AI systems [<span>53</span>].</p><p>Regional differences in regulatory approaches further complicate the global adoption of microbiome-conscious and AI-driven technologies. While regions like Asia-Pacific adopt flexible frameworks to encourage innovation, such as Japan's streamlined approval processes for functional cosmetics, disparities in safety and efficacy standards remain (Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2024) [<span>54</span>]. The push for global harmonization aligns with sustainability goals, as the UN emphasizes eco-conscious practices in dermatology, including energy-efficient devices (UN, 2024) [<span>55</span>]. Addressing these regulatory, ethical, and environmental challenges requires interdisciplinary collaboration and standardized guidelines to ensure innovation and patient safety.</p><p>The interplay between lasers and the skin microbiome represents a burgeoning area of research with immense potential to transform esthetic medicine. Laser technologies have become indispensable tools in modern dermatology, offering highly effective treatments for a variety of skin concerns such as acne scars, hyperpigmentation, and skin laxity. However, the potential impact of these treatments on the skin microbiome, a critical component of skin health, remains underexplored. Ablative lasers, while effective, disrupt the epidermal barrier and microbial equilibrium, while non-ablative and fractional lasers, though less invasive, still pose risks of microbial perturbation. Adopting microbiome-conscious approaches is essential to elevate the standard of care. Personalized protocols, informed by emerging insights into the microbiome and supported by advanced diagnostics, could minimize treatment-associated risks such as dysbiosis, infections, and inflammatory responses. Innovations like combination therapies, including photobiomodulation with fractional lasers, present promising pathways to achieve optimal esthetic results while preserving microbial health. Equally important is the role of post-treatment care, where microbiome-supportive regimens featuring probiotics, prebiotics, and barrier-protective products could facilitate faster recovery and reduce complications.</p><p>The integration of AI further amplifies the potential for precision medicine in this field. AI-driven tools could analyze microbiome profiles, predict treatment outcomes, and enable real-time parameter adjustments, paving the way for highly tailored and safe interventions. By harmonizing cutting-edge laser technologies with microbiome science, clinicians can achieve results that are both esthetically refined and biologically sustainable. As research into the skin microbiome and its relationship with lasers advances, the esthetic dermatology community must prioritize the development of evidence-based protocols that bridge the gap between therapeutic efficacy and microbial preservation. This paradigm shift not only enhances patient safety and satisfaction, but also underscores a broader commitment to holistic and integrative dermatological care. Ultimately, embracing microbiome-conscious strategies alongside innovations like AI will redefine the future of laser treatments, fostering long-term skin health while achieving exceptional esthetic outcomes. Future research should focus on clarifying these interactions and developing evidence-based guidelines for microbiome-conscious esthetic procedures.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in esthetic dermatology have increasingly emphasized the role of laser technologies in achieving precise, non-invasive, and highly effective treatments for various skin concerns. Lasers have become a cornerstone of modern dermatological care, offering solutions for conditions such as acne scars, hyperpigmentation, and skin laxity [1]. While the immediate therapeutic benefits of laser treatments are well-documented, a significant gap remains in understanding their broader systemic effects, particularly on the skin microbiome [2]. This oversight is critical because the skin microbiome functions as an integral component of skin health, influencing everything from immune defense to wound healing [3, 4]. By intentionally disrupting the skin's structure to stimulate repair and rejuvenation, laser treatments may inadvertently affect this vital ecosystem [5, 6]. Despite the increasing integration of microbiome research into dermatology, there remains limited direct clinical evidence demonstrating long-term microbiome disruption following laser procedures. While some hypotheses suggest that ablative lasers could alter microbial populations, no large-scale studies confirm an increased risk of infection or impaired healing due to microbiome dysbiosis. Instead, the skin's regenerative mechanisms often restore its microbial equilibrium post-treatment. Nevertheless, understanding how different laser modalities interact with the skin microbiome is an area requiring further investigation to optimize treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes. The question of how to balance therapeutic goals with microbiome preservation is now at the forefront of esthetic medicine. The skin microbiome plays a pivotal role in maintaining immune defense, skin barrier function, and overall dermatological health [7-9]. Recent studies underscore its vulnerability to various interventions, including laser treatments, highlighting the need for microbiome-conscious strategies. This commentary aims to bridge the gap between laser advancements and their impact on the microbiome, underscoring the importance of integrating microbiome-friendly practices into dermatology.

The skin microbiome operates as a dynamic and adaptive interface between the body and its external environment [10]. Its primary function is to protect the skin from pathogenic invasion by outcompeting harmful microbes and producing antimicrobial peptides. Beyond this, the microbiome also modulates local immune responses, preventing unnecessary inflammation that could damage skin tissues [11]. For example, commensal bacteria like Staphylococcus epidermidis and Cutibacterium acnes play critical roles in maintaining skin equilibrium. Cutibacterium acnes also contributes to maintaining the skin's acidic pH by metabolizing sebum triglycerides into short-chain fatty acids, such as propionic acid, which help sustain the acid mantle [12]. This acidic environment is crucial for skin health, as it inhibits pathogen colonization and supports the function of pH-dependent enzymes involved in skin barrier maintenance (Table 1). However, the fragility of this ecosystem is a concern. These organisms can be adversely affected by ablative lasers, necessitating strategies to protect or restore their populations. Incorporating topical probiotics or postbiotics post-procedure can help reinstate microbial balance [13]. Even subtle shifts in microbial composition can lead to dysbiosis, resulting in increased susceptibility to conditions such as atopic dermatitis or rosacea [14]. Environmental stressors, such as pollution, and therapeutic interventions, like lasers, can exacerbate this imbalance. Understanding the microbiome's resilience and thresholds for disruption is essential for developing treatments that respect and preserve this equilibrium [5, 15, 16].

Laser technologies achieve their effects by delivering energy to targeted chromophores, causing controlled thermal or photomechanical damage. This damage is intended to stimulate processes like collagen remodeling, cellular turnover, or vascular constriction, depending on the laser type and clinical indication [1]. For example, CO2 lasers ablate the skin's surface, leading to dramatic improvements in texture and tone, but also significantly alter the physical and microbial landscape [17]. Non-ablative lasers, on the other hand, induce sub-epidermal changes without disrupting the skin barrier, making them less likely to perturb microbial populations [18]. Fractional lasers strike a balance by creating microcolumns of injury surrounded by intact tissue, which supports faster recovery but may still affect the local microbiota [19]. The microbial impact of these technologies is largely understudied. Ablative treatments, which remove the protective outer layer of the skin, may expose deeper tissues to opportunistic pathogens, increasing the risk of infection [20]. This disruption creates a temporary void, which opportunistic pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa might exploit [20, 21]. Beyond bacterial populations, the impact of lasers on the skin microbiome may extend to interactions with physiological skin phages. Potential interactions between skin phages and external factors, such as temperature changes induced by laser treatments, are emerging as an area of growing interest [22]. While much focus has traditionally been placed on bacteria within the skin microbiome, the implications of laser treatments on phages and the broader microbiome may be even more significant. Physiological skin phages, particularly those targeting Cutibacterium acnes, play a crucial role in maintaining microbial homeostasis on the skin. These phages help regulate bacterial populations, preventing overgrowth and reducing the risk of inflammation associated with conditions like acne. Dysbiosis of these phages, whether due to an imbalance in their abundance, loss of diversity, or genetic changes, can disrupt this equilibrium, potentially leading to pathogenic bacterial overgrowth and exacerbating inflammatory skin disorders [23].

By influencing local skin temperature, lasers could impact the activity, replication, and host interactions of bacteriophages. This disruption could affect microbial homeostasis, influencing not only bacterial populations, but also the immune response and skin barrier function. Furthermore, environmental factors such as UV radiation, temperature, and humidity fluctuations are known to influence phage-bacteria interactions, highlighting the importance of exploring how laser-induced temperature changes may impact phage dynamics. Investigating these interactions is crucial to fully understanding the impact of dermatological treatments on the microbiome, ultimately helping to optimize both the safety and efficacy of these procedures [22, 23].

Non-ablative and fractional modalities, though gentler, could still disrupt microbial habitats, particularly with repeated or high-intensity use. Additionally, the inflammatory response triggered by laser treatments could exacerbate microbial imbalances, especially in patients with pre-existing conditions like rosacea, where inflammation and dysbiosis are already intertwined [24]. By altering skin hydration levels, these treatments may shift microbial communities, favoring certain species over others [25]. For instance, warm and moist conditions post-treatment could encourage the overgrowth of yeast-like fungi, leading to conditions such as pityrosporum folliculitis [26, 27]. This disruption in the skin's barrier and microbial balance can also facilitate the reactivation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) in individuals with a history of the virus. The reactivation of HSV after fractional laser treatment is primarily attributed to the skin's response to thermal and mechanical stress induced by the procedure. Fractional lasers create controlled microthermal zones of injury, which stimulate wound healing and collagen remodeling. However, this disruption of the skin barrier, combined with local inflammation and dysbiosis, could trigger HSV reactivation [28]. Stress-induced immunomodulation, including temporary suppression of local immune defenses, further facilitates viral replication and reactivation. These potential consequences necessitate a deeper understanding of how laser technologies interact with the microbiome at both a cellular and ecological level.

Different types of dermatological treatments have unique effects on the skin and its microbiome, requiring careful consideration of their mechanisms. When comparing non-laser treatments to lasers, the mechanisms of action and their effects on the skin differ significantly. While lasers target the dermis through controlled thermal injury to stimulate repair and remodeling, non-laser treatments such as chemical peels and injectables primarily affect the skin's surface or localized areas. Chemical peels disrupt the stratum corneum, leading to exfoliation that may temporarily alter microbial diversity [29]. Injectable treatments, on the other hand, can cause localized inflammation, which may indirectly influence the microbiome by altering the skin's microenvironment. Recognizing these differences is crucial for designing treatment protocols that minimize unintended microbial disruption while optimizing therapeutic outcomes [30]. Future individualized protocols, accounting for patient history and skin microbiome conditions, could help prevent such outcomes, even without the use of antiviral medication. While current evidence highlights the potential effects of laser treatments on the skin microbiome, much of this discussion remains largely theoretical due to a lack of long-term, controlled studies.

Emerging combined technologies that combine lasers with other modalities, such as photobiomodulation, present an exciting avenue for reducing the impact of treatments on the microbiome [31-33]. These combined approaches may allow for lower energy levels while still achieving comparable esthetic results, thereby minimizing the risk of disrupting microbial communities. For example, pairing fractional laser treatments with LED therapy can stimulate collagen production while promoting a favorable microbial environment [34]. While preliminary studies suggest that these combined approaches may help maintain microbial balance, there is currently insufficient clinical evidence to confirm their effectiveness in preventing microbiome disruption. Further investigations, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to validate their long-term impact and establish standardized treatment protocols that incorporate microbiome-friendly techniques.

Incorporating microbiome-conscious strategies into laser protocols is both a scientific necessity and an ethical imperative. Advances in laser technology have already made it possible to achieve significant esthetic results with reduced invasiveness, but further refinements are needed to minimize collateral damage to the microbiome [10]. One promising approach is the use of non-ablative lasers that deliver sufficient energy to stimulate dermal remodeling without compromising the epidermal barrier. Fractional technologies, particularly those with adjustable parameters, offer another avenue for balancing efficacy with microbiome preservation. Equally important is the timing and frequency of treatments. Overly aggressive protocols can overwhelm the skin's natural repair mechanisms, prolonging dysbiosis and delaying recovery. Spacing sessions appropriately allows the skin's microbial and structural systems to recover fully, reducing the risk of cumulative damage. By tailoring treatments to individual patient profiles, practitioners would further mitigate risks and enhance outcomes [35].

The recovery phase is a critical window for re-establishing microbial balance and ensuring long-term success. Post-laser care should prioritize products that support the microbiome's natural resilience [36]. For instance, topical probiotics can help recolonize the skin with beneficial bacteria, while prebiotics provide nourishment that encourages their growth [37-39]. Postbiotics, which are metabolic byproducts of microbial activity, offer additional benefits by directly modulating inflammation and promoting skin barrier repair [40, 41]. Equally important is protecting the skin barrier itself. Ceramide-rich moisturizers and occlusive agents can shield the skin from external aggressors while maintaining hydration levels conducive to microbial recovery [42]. Patients should be advised to avoid harsh cleansers, alcohol-based toners, and other products that could further disrupt the microbiome during this vulnerable period [43]. While promising, these strategies require further clinical validation to determine their precise role in post-laser recovery.

Recent research highlights the potential of lasers to support the skin microbiome when integrated with microbiome-conscious protocols. Fractional lasers, such as fractional CO2 and Erbium:YAG, create microablative zones of injury surrounded by intact tissue, facilitating faster microbial recolonization. Studies like that of Athanasiou et al. have shown that fractional CO2 laser treatments, when combined with postbiotic-enriched moisturizers, help maintain microbial diversity, reduce dysbiosis, and promote barrier repair [19]. De Sica et al. demonstrated that non-ablative fractional lasers, such as Erbium glass lasers, are particularly advantageous for preserving microbial health induce dermal remodeling without significantly disrupting the epidermal barrier, enabling faster microbial recovery when paired with microbiome-supportive skincare [18]. Manolis et al. found that the use of probiotic-enriched serums following CO2 laser resurfacing significantly reduced infection risks and accelerated microbial balance restoration [17].

Further research is needed to optimize these synergistic approaches, focusing on randomized controlled trials to validate their efficacy in maintaining microbial balance.

Personalized medicine is the future of esthetic care, and microbiome analysis is a key tool in this evolution. By sequencing a patient's microbiome prior to treatment, clinicians can identify vulnerabilities, such as low microbial diversity or the presence of pathogenic species. These insights can inform decisions about laser parameters, post-treatment care, and follow-up schedules, ensuring that interventions are both effective and microbiome friendly. AI-driven diagnostic platforms are making these analyses more accessible. By integrating microbiome data with other dermatological parameters, these tools can generate comprehensive treatment plans tailored to individual needs [44]. This level of precision enhances patient outcomes and sets a new standard for care in esthetic medicine.

As our understanding of the skin microbiome deepens, its integration into esthetic practices will likely become the norm rather than the exception. Hybrid treatments that combine lasers with microbiome-enhancing therapies, such as LED photobiomodulation, represent one exciting avenue for innovation [5]. Similarly, advancements in biotechnology may soon yield post-treatment products that are specifically designed to support microbial recovery, such as bioactive serums containing live bacteria or their beneficial metabolites. The ultimate goal is to move beyond treating the skin in isolation and adopt a holistic perspective that considers its symbiotic relationship with the microbiome. By doing so, practitioners can achieve results that are esthetically refined yet biologically sustainable, fostering long-term patient satisfaction and trust.

The effectiveness and safety of laser treatments are significantly influenced by individual patient profiles. Baseline microbiome health is a critical factor in determining how well the skin recovers post-treatment [2, 45]. Patients with a diverse and balanced microbiome may exhibit faster healing and lower susceptibility to infections or dysbiosis compared to those with a compromised microbiome, such as individuals with a history of atopic dermatitis or long-term use of topical antibiotics [46]. Pre-existing conditions like rosacea or acne may also predispose patients to heightened inflammatory responses, necessitating extra care in selecting laser modalities and parameters. Tailoring laser treatments to accommodate these diverse profiles necessitates a comprehensive understanding of patient history, skin type, and underlying conditions, ensuring personalized and effective outcomes [1, 47]. For instance, patients with rosacea may benefit from non-ablative or fractional laser modalities to minimize inflammation, while those with compromised microbiomes might require extended recovery periods between sessions. Incorporating these considerations ensures that laser treatments are effective while minimizing risks, fostering safer and more personalized dermatological care.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into microbiome-conscious laser treatments offers a transformative opportunity to elevate patient safety and therapeutic outcomes while preserving the delicate skin microbiome. By leveraging AI, clinicians can tailor laser protocols with unprecedented precision, optimizing treatment effectiveness and minimizing microbial disruption. AI-driven tools could analyze patient-specific data, including microbiome profiles, skin imaging, and environmental factors, to recommend laser modalities and settings most suited to individual needs [48]. For example, AI algorithms could identify patients at higher risk of laser-induced dysbiosis and adjust energy levels, pulse durations, or cooling parameters to protect microbial diversity. Machine learning models trained on extensive datasets could also predict complications such as infections or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), enabling proactive adjustments during treatment planning [49].

During laser procedures, real-time AI-enabled monitoring systems could dynamically adjust parameters based on the skin's response. These systems would allow for adaptive treatments that maintain efficacy while minimizing unnecessary damage to the skin barrier and its resident microbiota. Post-treatment, AI-powered diagnostic platforms and wearable devices could track microbial recovery and skin barrier restoration [50]. These tools could provide personalized recommendations, such as microbiome-supportive skincare products or optimal follow-up schedules, ensuring a faster and safer recovery. Moreover, AI-driven analyses could help clinicians refine combined treatment approaches, such as pairing lasers with photobiomodulation, to achieve esthetic goals with reduced microbiome disruption.

The evolving regulatory landscape for microbiome-conscious laser treatments and AI-driven applications in dermatology presents critical opportunities and challenges. A key consideration lies in the delineation of claims for microbiome-related products. For instance, the distinction between cosmetic and therapeutic claims often determines the regulatory pathway, as seen in the Cosmetics Regulation in Europe and the FDA Cosmetic Labeling Guidelines in the United States [51, 52]. Recent studies have highlighted the need for standardized clinical trials to substantiate claims regarding the efficacy of probiotics and prebiotics in dermatological care. For example, França et al. emphasized the role of probiotics in barrier repair and inflammation modulation, suggesting the necessity for robust clinical validation before market approval [41]. Similarly, Gueniche et al. demonstrated microbiome-supportive product efficacy in enhancing post-laser recovery, underscoring the need for regulatory oversight to ensure product safety and consistency [36].

The integration of AI in dermatology adds another layer of complexity. The Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) in the European Union proposes a risk-based framework for AI applications, which could impact the development of AI-driven diagnostic tools and predictive models (European Commission, 2024) [51]. Studies such as those by Haykal et al. have demonstrated the transformative potential of AI in tailoring laser treatments to individual microbiome profiles, but these technologies must meet transparency and bias mitigation criteria to ensure equitable outcomes across diverse populations [49]. Regulatory concerns also extend to the ethical use of patient data, as highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO), which advocates for fairness and inclusivity in AI systems [53].

Regional differences in regulatory approaches further complicate the global adoption of microbiome-conscious and AI-driven technologies. While regions like Asia-Pacific adopt flexible frameworks to encourage innovation, such as Japan's streamlined approval processes for functional cosmetics, disparities in safety and efficacy standards remain (Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2024) [54]. The push for global harmonization aligns with sustainability goals, as the UN emphasizes eco-conscious practices in dermatology, including energy-efficient devices (UN, 2024) [55]. Addressing these regulatory, ethical, and environmental challenges requires interdisciplinary collaboration and standardized guidelines to ensure innovation and patient safety.

The interplay between lasers and the skin microbiome represents a burgeoning area of research with immense potential to transform esthetic medicine. Laser technologies have become indispensable tools in modern dermatology, offering highly effective treatments for a variety of skin concerns such as acne scars, hyperpigmentation, and skin laxity. However, the potential impact of these treatments on the skin microbiome, a critical component of skin health, remains underexplored. Ablative lasers, while effective, disrupt the epidermal barrier and microbial equilibrium, while non-ablative and fractional lasers, though less invasive, still pose risks of microbial perturbation. Adopting microbiome-conscious approaches is essential to elevate the standard of care. Personalized protocols, informed by emerging insights into the microbiome and supported by advanced diagnostics, could minimize treatment-associated risks such as dysbiosis, infections, and inflammatory responses. Innovations like combination therapies, including photobiomodulation with fractional lasers, present promising pathways to achieve optimal esthetic results while preserving microbial health. Equally important is the role of post-treatment care, where microbiome-supportive regimens featuring probiotics, prebiotics, and barrier-protective products could facilitate faster recovery and reduce complications.

The integration of AI further amplifies the potential for precision medicine in this field. AI-driven tools could analyze microbiome profiles, predict treatment outcomes, and enable real-time parameter adjustments, paving the way for highly tailored and safe interventions. By harmonizing cutting-edge laser technologies with microbiome science, clinicians can achieve results that are both esthetically refined and biologically sustainable. As research into the skin microbiome and its relationship with lasers advances, the esthetic dermatology community must prioritize the development of evidence-based protocols that bridge the gap between therapeutic efficacy and microbial preservation. This paradigm shift not only enhances patient safety and satisfaction, but also underscores a broader commitment to holistic and integrative dermatological care. Ultimately, embracing microbiome-conscious strategies alongside innovations like AI will redefine the future of laser treatments, fostering long-term skin health while achieving exceptional esthetic outcomes. Future research should focus on clarifying these interactions and developing evidence-based guidelines for microbiome-conscious esthetic procedures.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

导航激光和皮肤微生物组的交叉点:美学皮肤病学的新前沿
这种破坏产生了一个暂时的空隙,机会性病原体如金黄色葡萄球菌或铜绿假单胞菌可能会利用这个空隙[20,21]。除了细菌种群,激光对皮肤微生物组的影响可能会扩展到与生理皮肤噬菌体的相互作用。皮肤噬菌体与外部因素之间的潜在相互作用,如激光治疗引起的温度变化,正在成为一个越来越受关注的领域。虽然传统上关注的是皮肤微生物组中的细菌,但激光治疗对噬菌体和更广泛的微生物组的影响可能更为重要。生理性皮肤噬菌体,特别是针对痤疮角质杆菌的噬菌体,在维持皮肤微生物稳态方面起着至关重要的作用。这些噬菌体有助于调节细菌数量,防止过度生长,降低与痤疮等疾病相关的炎症风险。这些噬菌体的生态失调,无论是由于其丰度失衡、多样性丧失还是遗传变化,都可能破坏这种平衡,潜在地导致致病菌过度生长并加剧炎症性皮肤疾病[23]。通过影响局部皮肤温度,激光可以影响噬菌体的活性、复制和宿主相互作用。这种破坏可能会影响微生物稳态,不仅影响细菌种群,还影响免疫反应和皮肤屏障功能。此外,已知环境因素如紫外线辐射、温度和湿度波动会影响噬菌体-细菌的相互作用,这突出了探索激光诱导的温度变化如何影响噬菌体动力学的重要性。研究这些相互作用对于充分了解皮肤科治疗对微生物组的影响至关重要,最终有助于优化这些治疗的安全性和有效性[22,23]。非烧蚀和部分方式,虽然温和,仍然可能破坏微生物栖息地,特别是重复或高强度使用。此外,激光治疗引发的炎症反应可能会加剧微生物的失衡,尤其是在患有酒渣鼻等疾病的患者中,炎症和生态失调已经交织在一起了。通过改变皮肤的水合水平,这些治疗可能会改变微生物群落,使某些物种比其他物种更受青睐。例如,处理后温暖潮湿的环境可能会促进酵母样真菌的过度生长,导致诸如糠秕孢子菌毛囊炎等疾病[26,27]。这种对皮肤屏障和微生物平衡的破坏也会促进单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)在有病毒史的个体中的再激活。局部激光治疗后HSV的再激活主要归因于皮肤对手术引起的热应力和机械应力的反应。分式激光产生可控的损伤微热区,刺激伤口愈合和胶原蛋白重塑。然而,这种皮肤屏障的破坏,加上局部炎症和生态失调,可能引发HSV再激活[28]。应激诱导的免疫调节,包括暂时抑制局部免疫防御,进一步促进病毒复制和再激活。这些潜在的后果需要更深入地了解激光技术如何在细胞和生态水平上与微生物群相互作用。不同类型的皮肤病治疗对皮肤及其微生物组有独特的影响,需要仔细考虑其机制。当比较非激光治疗和激光治疗时,作用机制和它们对皮肤的影响有很大不同。激光通过控制热损伤来刺激真皮层的修复和重塑,而非激光治疗,如化学换肤和注射,主要影响皮肤表面或局部区域。化学换肤会破坏角质层,导致角质脱落,可能会暂时改变微生物的多样性。另一方面,注射治疗可引起局部炎症,这可能通过改变皮肤微环境间接影响微生物组。认识到这些差异对于设计治疗方案至关重要,从而最大限度地减少意外的微生物破坏,同时优化治疗效果。未来的个性化方案,考虑到患者病史和皮肤微生物组状况,可以帮助预防这种结果,即使不使用抗病毒药物。虽然目前的证据强调了激光治疗对皮肤微生物群的潜在影响,但由于缺乏长期的对照研究,这种讨论在很大程度上仍然是理论性的。 新兴的组合技术将激光与其他模式相结合,如光生物调节,为减少治疗对微生物组的影响提供了一条令人兴奋的途径[31-33]。这些组合的方法可能允许更低的能量水平,同时仍然达到相当的美观效果,从而最大限度地减少破坏微生物群落的风险。例如,将分次激光治疗与LED治疗相结合,可以刺激胶原蛋白的产生,同时促进有利的微生物环境。虽然初步研究表明这些联合方法可能有助于维持微生物平衡,但目前没有足够的临床证据证实它们在预防微生物群破坏方面的有效性。需要进一步的研究,包括随机对照试验,来验证它们的长期影响,并建立包含微生物友好技术的标准化治疗方案。将微生物组意识策略纳入激光协议既是科学上的必要,也是伦理上的必要。激光技术的进步已经可以在减少侵入性的情况下获得显著的美学效果,但还需要进一步改进,以最大限度地减少对微生物群的附带损害。一种有希望的方法是使用非烧蚀激光,它提供足够的能量来刺激皮肤重塑,而不损害表皮屏障。分数技术,特别是那些具有可调参数的技术,为平衡功效与微生物组保存提供了另一种途径。同样重要的是治疗的时间和频率。过于激进的方案可以压倒皮肤的自然修复机制,延长生态失调和延迟恢复。适当的间隔时间可以让皮肤的微生物和结构系统完全恢复,减少累积损伤的风险。通过针对个别患者的治疗,从业者将进一步降低风险,提高疗效。恢复阶段是重建微生物平衡和确保长期成功的关键窗口。激光后护理应该优先考虑支持微生物群自然恢复能力的产品。例如,局部益生菌可以帮助皮肤重新聚集有益细菌,而益生元提供营养,促进它们的生长[37-39]。后生物制剂是微生物活动的代谢副产物,通过直接调节炎症和促进皮肤屏障修复提供额外的益处[40,41]。同样重要的是保护皮肤屏障本身。富含神经酰胺的保湿剂和闭塞剂可以保护皮肤免受外部侵略者的侵害,同时保持水分水平,有利于微生物的恢复。应建议患者避免使用刺激性清洁剂、含酒精的爽肤水和其他可能进一步破坏这个脆弱时期微生物群的产品。虽然这些策略很有希望,但需要进一步的临床验证来确定它们在激光后恢复中的确切作用。最近的研究强调了激光在与微生物组意识方案相结合时支持皮肤微生物组的潜力。分数激光,如分数CO2和Erbium:YAG,在完整的组织周围形成损伤的微烧蚀区,促进微生物更快地重新定植。Athanasiou等人的研究表明,当部分CO2激光治疗与生物后富集的保湿霜结合使用时,有助于维持微生物多样性,减少生态失调,促进屏障修复bb0。De Sica等人证明,非烧蚀分数激光器,如铒玻璃激光器,特别有利于保持微生物健康,诱导皮肤重塑,而不会显着破坏表皮屏障,当与支持微生物组的护肤bbb配合使用时,可以更快地恢复微生物。Manolis等人发现,在CO2激光表面修复后使用富含益生菌的血清可显著降低感染风险并加速微生物平衡恢复[10]。需要进一步的研究来优化这些协同方法,重点是随机对照试验来验证它们在维持微生物平衡方面的功效。个性化医疗是美容护理的未来,微生物组分析是这一演变的关键工具。通过在治疗前对患者的微生物组进行测序,临床医生可以识别出脆弱性,例如微生物多样性低或致病性物种的存在。这些见解可以为激光参数、治疗后护理和随访计划的决策提供信息,确保干预措施既有效又对微生物群友好。人工智能驱动的诊断平台使这些分析更容易获得。 通过将微生物组数据与其他皮肤病学参数相结合,这些工具可以生成针对个人需求的综合治疗方案[10]。这种精确度提高了患者的治疗效果,并为美容医学的护理树立了新的标准。随着我们对皮肤微生物群了解的加深,将其融入审美实践可能会成为常态,而不是例外。将激光与微生物增强疗法相结合的混合疗法,如LED光生物调节,代表了一种令人兴奋的创新途径。同样,生物技术的进步可能很快就会产生专门用于支持微生物恢复的后处理产品,例如含有活细菌或其有益代谢物的生物活性血清。最终的目标是超越孤立地治疗皮肤,采用整体的观点,考虑皮肤与微生物群的共生关系。通过这样做,从业者可以达到美观精致但生物可持续的结果,培养长期的患者满意度和信任。激光治疗的有效性和安全性受到个体患者情况的显著影响。基线微生物群健康是决定治疗后皮肤恢复程度的关键因素[2,45]。与那些微生物群受损的患者(如有特应性皮炎病史或长期使用局部抗生素的患者)相比,具有多样化和平衡的微生物组的患者可能表现出更快的愈合和更低的感染或生态失调易感性。酒渣鼻或痤疮等原有疾病也可能使患者容易产生炎症反应,因此在选择激光治疗方式和参数时需要格外小心。定制激光治疗以适应这些不同的情况需要全面了解患者病史,皮肤类型和潜在条件,以确保个性化和有效的结果[1,47]。例如,酒渣鼻患者可能受益于非烧蚀或分次激光治疗,以最大限度地减少炎症,而微生物组受损的患者可能需要延长两次治疗之间的恢复时间。结合这些考虑因素,确保激光治疗是有效的,同时最大限度地降低风险,促进更安全和更个性化的皮肤护理。人工智能(AI)与微生物组意识激光治疗的整合提供了一个变革性的机会,可以在保护皮肤微生物组的同时提高患者的安全性和治疗效果。通过利用人工智能,临床医生可以以前所未有的精度定制激光方案,优化治疗效果并最大限度地减少微生物破坏。人工智能驱动的工具可以分析患者特定的数据,包括微生物组概况、皮肤成像和环境因素,以推荐最适合个人需求的激光模式和设置。例如,人工智能算法可以识别激光诱导的生态失调风险较高的患者,并调整能量水平、脉冲持续时间或冷却参数,以保护微生物多样性。在大量数据集上训练的机器学习模型还可以预测感染或炎症后色素沉着(PIH)等并发症,从而在治疗计划期间进行主动调整。在激光手术过程中,实时人工智能监控系统可以根据皮肤的反应动态调整参数。这些系统将允许适应性治疗,在保持疗效的同时,最大限度地减少对皮肤屏障及其常驻微生物群的不必要损害。治疗后,人工智能诊断平台和可穿戴设备可以跟踪微生物恢复和皮肤屏障恢复[50]。这些工具可以提供个性化的建议,例如支持微生物组的护肤产品或最佳的随访计划,确保更快、更安全的恢复。此外,人工智能驱动的分析可以帮助临床医生改进联合治疗方法,例如将激光和光生物调节相结合,以减少微生物群破坏来实现美学目标。在皮肤病学中,关注微生物组的激光治疗和人工智能驱动的应用不断发展的监管环境带来了关键的机遇和挑战。一个关键的考虑因素在于描述微生物组相关产品的权利要求。例如,化妆品和治疗声称之间的区别往往决定了监管途径,如欧洲的化妆品法规和美国的FDA化妆品标签指南[51,52]。最近的研究强调需要标准化的临床试验来证实关于益生菌和益生元在皮肤科护理中的功效。例如,franpada等人。 强调益生菌在屏障修复和炎症调节中的作用,建议在市场批准之前需要进行强有力的临床验证。同样,Gueniche等人证明了支持微生物组的产品在增强激光后恢复方面的功效,强调了监管监督的必要性,以确保产品的安全性和一致性[10]。人工智能在皮肤科的整合增加了另一层复杂性。欧盟的《人工智能法案》(AIA)为人工智能应用提出了一个基于风险的框架,这可能会影响人工智能驱动的诊断工具和预测模型的发展(欧盟委员会,2024年)。Haykal等人的研究已经证明了人工智能在针对个体微生物群特征定制激光治疗方面的变革潜力,但这些技术必须满足透明度和减少偏见的标准,以确保在不同人群中获得公平的结果[10]。正如世界卫生组织(世卫组织)所强调的那样,监管方面的关切还延伸到患者数据的道德使用,世卫组织主张在人工智能系统中实现公平和包容性。监管方法的地区差异使全球采用微生物组意识和人工智能驱动技术进一步复杂化。虽然亚太等地区采用灵活的框架来鼓励创新,例如日本简化了功能性化妆品的审批程序,但安全性和有效性标准方面的差异仍然存在(日本厚生劳动省,2024年)。推动全球统一与可持续发展目标是一致的,因为联合国强调皮肤科的生态意识实践,包括节能设备(UN, 2024)。应对这些监管、伦理和环境挑战需要跨学科合作和标准化指南,以确保创新和患者安全。激光和皮肤微生物群之间的相互作用代表了一个新兴的研究领域,具有巨大的潜力来改变美容医学。激光技术已经成为现代皮肤病学中不可或缺的工具,为各种皮肤问题,如痤疮疤痕,色素沉着和皮肤松弛提供了高效的治疗。然而,这些治疗对皮肤微生物群(皮肤健康的关键组成部分)的潜在影响仍未得到充分探索。烧蚀激光虽然有效,但会破坏表皮屏障和微生物平衡,而非烧蚀激光和分数激光虽然侵入性较小,但仍然存在微生物扰动的风险。采用意识到微生物组的方法对于提高护理标准至关重要。基于对微生物组的新见解和先进诊断的个性化方案可以最大限度地减少与治疗相关的风险,如生态失调、感染和炎症反应。像联合疗法这样的创新,包括用分数激光进行光生物调节,提供了在保持微生物健康的同时实现最佳美学效果的有希望的途径。同样重要的是治疗后护理的作用,其中以益生菌、益生元和屏障保护产品为特色的微生物组支持方案可以促进更快的恢复并减少并发症。人工智能的整合进一步放大了该领域精准医疗的潜力。人工智能驱动的工具可以分析微生物群特征,预测治疗结果,并实现实时参数调整,为高度定制和安全的干预措施铺平道路。通过将尖端激光技术与微生物组科学相协调,临床医生可以获得既美观又具有生物可持续性的结果。随着对皮肤微生物组及其与激光关系的研究进展,美容皮肤科必须优先考虑基于证据的方案的发展,以弥合治疗效果和微生物保存之间的差距。这种模式的转变不仅提高了患者的安全性和满意度,而且还强调了对整体和综合皮肤科护理的更广泛承诺。最终,采用微生物组意识策略和人工智能等创新将重新定义激光治疗的未来,促进长期皮肤健康,同时实现卓越的美学效果。未来的研究应侧重于澄清这些相互作用,并为微生物有意识的美容程序制定循证指南。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信