The Kesty Redness Scale: A Pilot Validation Study for a Novel Tool for Evaluating Facial Redness in Cosmetic and Clinical Dermatology

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Chelsea E. Kesty, Katarina R. Kesty
{"title":"The Kesty Redness Scale: A Pilot Validation Study for a Novel Tool for Evaluating Facial Redness in Cosmetic and Clinical Dermatology","authors":"Chelsea E. Kesty,&nbsp;Katarina R. Kesty","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Facial redness is a common concern in dermatology, affecting patients with conditions such as rosacea, post-inflammatory erythema, and other vascular irregularities. Despite its prevalence, existing tools for quantifying facial redness are limited in their clinical utility and ease of use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To develop a high-performing redness scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study introduces the Kesty Redness Scale (KRS), outlines its development and validation process, and discusses its potential clinical applications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The investigators rated the scale as useful and easy to use, and the majority stated they would use it in clinical practice to document patient characteristics. The results of the evaluation utilizing Gwet's AC2, Kendall's W, Spearman's ρ, Weighted Cohen's kappa, and Bland–Altman analysis —showcasing strong ordinal agreement, robust rank concordance, and negligible bias—demonstrate that this new rating system is both reliable and valid for measuring skin hyperpigmentation on a 0–3 scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The KRS is a reliable, easy-to-use tool that enhances the assessment of facial redness in dermatology. Its validation through expert evaluation and statistical analysis underscores its potential to improve clinical practice and research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Facial redness is a common concern in dermatology, affecting patients with conditions such as rosacea, post-inflammatory erythema, and other vascular irregularities. Despite its prevalence, existing tools for quantifying facial redness are limited in their clinical utility and ease of use.

Aims

To develop a high-performing redness scale.

Methods

This study introduces the Kesty Redness Scale (KRS), outlines its development and validation process, and discusses its potential clinical applications.

Results

The investigators rated the scale as useful and easy to use, and the majority stated they would use it in clinical practice to document patient characteristics. The results of the evaluation utilizing Gwet's AC2, Kendall's W, Spearman's ρ, Weighted Cohen's kappa, and Bland–Altman analysis —showcasing strong ordinal agreement, robust rank concordance, and negligible bias—demonstrate that this new rating system is both reliable and valid for measuring skin hyperpigmentation on a 0–3 scale.

Conclusions

The KRS is a reliable, easy-to-use tool that enhances the assessment of facial redness in dermatology. Its validation through expert evaluation and statistical analysis underscores its potential to improve clinical practice and research.

背景 面部发红是皮肤科常见的问题,影响着红斑痤疮、炎症后红斑和其他血管不规则等疾病的患者。尽管面部红血丝很普遍,但现有的量化工具在临床实用性和易用性方面都很有限。 目的 开发一种高性能的红血丝量表。 方法 本研究介绍了 Kesty 红血丝量表(KRS),概述了其开发和验证过程,并讨论了其潜在的临床应用。 结果 研究人员认为该量表有用且易于使用,大多数人表示他们将在临床实践中使用该量表记录患者特征。使用 Gwet's AC2、Kendall's W、Spearman's ρ、加权 Cohen's kappa 和 Bland-Altman 分析进行评估的结果表明,这一新的评级系统在以 0-3 级测量皮肤色素沉着方面既可靠又有效。 结论 KRS 是一种可靠、易用的工具,可增强皮肤科对面部发红的评估。通过专家评估和统计分析对其进行验证,凸显了它在改善临床实践和研究方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信