A Systematic Literature Review of Treatment Approaches with Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria for Acid Mine Drainage

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jéssica Pelinsom Marques, Valéria Guimarães Silvestre Rodrigues
{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review of Treatment Approaches with Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria for Acid Mine Drainage","authors":"Jéssica Pelinsom Marques,&nbsp;Valéria Guimarães Silvestre Rodrigues","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07916-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) has emerged as a promising technology to treat Acid Mine Drainage (AMD). These bacteria can reduce sulfate to sulfide under anaerobic conditions and the sulfide formed can react with metal ions in water, creating insoluble precipitates. This paper systematically reviews the different treatment systems and approaches explored for applying SRB in AMD treatment. The review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology and included 16 articles published between 1995 and 2024. The main bacteria identified were <i>Desulfosporosinus</i>, <i>Desulfovibrio</i>, and <i>Desulfotomaculum</i>. Researchers used environmental samples of AMD and acidic solutions prepared in laboratory and most studies proposed bioreactors, although research on in situ bioremediation and permeable reactive barriers was also found. Sulfate reduction efficiencies ranged from 74.8% to 100.0% and the systems also showed high efficiency for removing metals and metalloids such as iron (Fe), copper (Cu), arsenic (As), and mainly zinc (Zn). Advantages include efficiency, versatility, low cost compared to conventional treatments, possibility of using waste-derived resources as a carbon source for bacteria, and potential for the recovery of metals in a commercially viable form. The main challenges are related to sensitivity of the bacteria to acidic environments and high metal(loid) concentrations. Future studies should explore optimization of processes under different environmental conditions and treatment systems with environmental samples of AMD from different types of mining and locations. Nevertheless, significant advances have been made on the use of SRB for AMD treatment, making it a promising remediation technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07916-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) has emerged as a promising technology to treat Acid Mine Drainage (AMD). These bacteria can reduce sulfate to sulfide under anaerobic conditions and the sulfide formed can react with metal ions in water, creating insoluble precipitates. This paper systematically reviews the different treatment systems and approaches explored for applying SRB in AMD treatment. The review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology and included 16 articles published between 1995 and 2024. The main bacteria identified were Desulfosporosinus, Desulfovibrio, and Desulfotomaculum. Researchers used environmental samples of AMD and acidic solutions prepared in laboratory and most studies proposed bioreactors, although research on in situ bioremediation and permeable reactive barriers was also found. Sulfate reduction efficiencies ranged from 74.8% to 100.0% and the systems also showed high efficiency for removing metals and metalloids such as iron (Fe), copper (Cu), arsenic (As), and mainly zinc (Zn). Advantages include efficiency, versatility, low cost compared to conventional treatments, possibility of using waste-derived resources as a carbon source for bacteria, and potential for the recovery of metals in a commercially viable form. The main challenges are related to sensitivity of the bacteria to acidic environments and high metal(loid) concentrations. Future studies should explore optimization of processes under different environmental conditions and treatment systems with environmental samples of AMD from different types of mining and locations. Nevertheless, significant advances have been made on the use of SRB for AMD treatment, making it a promising remediation technique.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信