Quantification and modelling of methane and carbon dioxide surface emissions from a South African landfill†

IF 3.5 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
P. O. Njoku, S. Piketh, R. Makungo and J. N. Edokpayi
{"title":"Quantification and modelling of methane and carbon dioxide surface emissions from a South African landfill†","authors":"P. O. Njoku, S. Piketh, R. Makungo and J. N. Edokpayi","doi":"10.1039/D4VA00302K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Landfill gas (LFG) emissions, primarily CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> and CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, result from decomposing organic waste in landfills. South Africa faces challenges in managing LFG emissions and effectively handling landfill sites. For this study, a static flux chamber was used to sample CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> and CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> emissions. The study showed that CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> emissions in the capped area had a concentration of 360 819.80 mg m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>, with an average emission rate of 433.00 g per m<small><sup>2</sup></small> per day, resulting in 6363.43 Mg per year during the wet season. The active area was observed to have emitted the highest CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> concentration (419 863 mg m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>) when compared to other areas of the landfill. The lowest CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> concentration (45 922.52 mg m<small><sup>−3</sup></small>) was emitted from the virgin area. From the virgin area, an average emission rate of 55.11 g per m<small><sup>2</sup></small> per day, resulting in 605.72 Mg per year, was recorded. Similar results based on the sample area variations were also observed during the dry season. Specifically, the active and capped sample area experienced higher CH<small><sub>4</sub></small> emissions than the leachate and virgin sample areas. Furthermore, it was observed that the concentrations and emission rates of LFGs emitted during the dry season were lower when compared to the wet season. Similarly, the concentration of CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> emissions was higher during the wet season than during the dry season. Enhanced control methods are recommended to improve LFG management practices, especially during the wet season when emissions are higher. Highlighting seasonal variability in emissions underscores the need for targeted strategies to mitigate environmental and health risks. Quantifying LFG emissions from the Thohoyandou landfill in this study sheds light on the environmental and health risks involved. The data presented are crucial for improving landfill management practices in South Africa and for validating the LandGEM model with field-measured and laboratory-analyzed data.</p>","PeriodicalId":72941,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science. Advances","volume":" 4","pages":" 648-662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/va/d4va00302k?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science. Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/va/d4va00302k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landfill gas (LFG) emissions, primarily CH4 and CO2, result from decomposing organic waste in landfills. South Africa faces challenges in managing LFG emissions and effectively handling landfill sites. For this study, a static flux chamber was used to sample CH4 and CO2 emissions. The study showed that CH4 emissions in the capped area had a concentration of 360 819.80 mg m−3, with an average emission rate of 433.00 g per m2 per day, resulting in 6363.43 Mg per year during the wet season. The active area was observed to have emitted the highest CH4 concentration (419 863 mg m−3) when compared to other areas of the landfill. The lowest CH4 concentration (45 922.52 mg m−3) was emitted from the virgin area. From the virgin area, an average emission rate of 55.11 g per m2 per day, resulting in 605.72 Mg per year, was recorded. Similar results based on the sample area variations were also observed during the dry season. Specifically, the active and capped sample area experienced higher CH4 emissions than the leachate and virgin sample areas. Furthermore, it was observed that the concentrations and emission rates of LFGs emitted during the dry season were lower when compared to the wet season. Similarly, the concentration of CO2 emissions was higher during the wet season than during the dry season. Enhanced control methods are recommended to improve LFG management practices, especially during the wet season when emissions are higher. Highlighting seasonal variability in emissions underscores the need for targeted strategies to mitigate environmental and health risks. Quantifying LFG emissions from the Thohoyandou landfill in this study sheds light on the environmental and health risks involved. The data presented are crucial for improving landfill management practices in South Africa and for validating the LandGEM model with field-measured and laboratory-analyzed data.

Abstract Image

南非垃圾填埋场地表甲烷和二氧化碳排放的量化和建模
垃圾填埋气(LFG)的排放,主要是甲烷和二氧化碳,是由垃圾填埋场的有机废物分解产生的。南非在管理LFG排放和有效处理垃圾填埋场方面面临挑战。在本研究中,采用静态通量室对CH4和CO2排放进行采样。研究表明,封顶区CH4排放浓度为360819.80 mg m−3,平均排放速率为433.00 g / m2 / d,雨季年排放量为6363.43 mg。与垃圾填埋场的其他区域相比,活跃区域排放的CH4浓度最高(419 863 mg m - 3)。未开发区排放的CH4浓度最低,为45 922.52 mg m−3。在未开发地区,平均排放量为每平方米每天55.11克,每年605.72毫克。在旱季也观察到基于样本面积变化的类似结果。活性和封盖样区CH4排放量高于渗滤液样区和未处理样区。此外,与雨季相比,旱季排放的lfg浓度和排放率较低。同样,雨季的CO2排放浓度高于旱季。建议加强控制方法,以改善LFG管理做法,特别是在排放量较高的雨季。强调排放的季节性变化,强调需要制定有针对性的战略,以减轻环境和健康风险。本研究量化了Thohoyandou垃圾填埋场的LFG排放,揭示了所涉及的环境和健康风险。所提供的数据对于改善南非的垃圾填埋场管理实践以及用实地测量和实验室分析的数据验证LandGEM模型至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信