Effectiveness of Ambidextrous Strategy Over the Company's Life Cycle: Evidence From Korean SMEs

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sungwook Jung;Jiho Yoon;Srinivas Talluri;Changhee Kim
{"title":"Effectiveness of Ambidextrous Strategy Over the Company's Life Cycle: Evidence From Korean SMEs","authors":"Sungwook Jung;Jiho Yoon;Srinivas Talluri;Changhee Kim","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3551249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's business environment, companies face the dual challenge of improving customer satisfaction through continuous innovation while enhancing efficiency. The ambidextrous strategy has emerged as a promising approach to address such a challenge. This study investigates whether the ambidextrous strategy enhances firm performance and capabilities compared to efficiency-oriented or innovation-oriented strategies in the context of small and medium-sized manufacturing companies in Korea. To achieve this objective, companies were categorized within a 2×2 matrix, with quadrants determined based on mean values of efficiency scores and the level of innovation. Notably, this research differs from prior studies by placing a specific emphasis on quantifying operational efficiency through the input-oriented BCC data envelopment analysis model. Subsequently, it empirically identifies the most effective strategy both in a general sense and at each life cycle stage. The findings of this study are twofold: First, companies in the mature growth and maturity stages achieve the highest sales profits when actively pursuing an ambidextrous strategy. Second, companies prioritizing innovation generally demonstrate higher capabilities across all stages. These results offer valuable insights and strategic guidance for business practitioners seeking strategic approaches that balance innovation and efficiency.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"1089-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10927627/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today's business environment, companies face the dual challenge of improving customer satisfaction through continuous innovation while enhancing efficiency. The ambidextrous strategy has emerged as a promising approach to address such a challenge. This study investigates whether the ambidextrous strategy enhances firm performance and capabilities compared to efficiency-oriented or innovation-oriented strategies in the context of small and medium-sized manufacturing companies in Korea. To achieve this objective, companies were categorized within a 2×2 matrix, with quadrants determined based on mean values of efficiency scores and the level of innovation. Notably, this research differs from prior studies by placing a specific emphasis on quantifying operational efficiency through the input-oriented BCC data envelopment analysis model. Subsequently, it empirically identifies the most effective strategy both in a general sense and at each life cycle stage. The findings of this study are twofold: First, companies in the mature growth and maturity stages achieve the highest sales profits when actively pursuing an ambidextrous strategy. Second, companies prioritizing innovation generally demonstrate higher capabilities across all stages. These results offer valuable insights and strategic guidance for business practitioners seeking strategic approaches that balance innovation and efficiency.
双管齐下战略在企业生命周期中的有效性:来自韩国中小企业的证据
在当今的商业环境中,企业面临着通过不断创新来提高客户满意度和提高效率的双重挑战。“双管齐下”战略已成为应对这一挑战的一种有希望的方法。本研究以韩国中小制造企业为研究对象,探讨与效率导向或创新导向战略相比,双灵巧战略是否能提高企业绩效和能力。为了实现这一目标,公司在2×2矩阵中进行分类,根据效率得分的平均值和创新水平确定象限。值得注意的是,本研究不同于以往的研究,它特别强调通过以投入为导向的BCC数据包络分析模型来量化运营效率。随后,它经验地确定了在一般意义上和在每个生命周期阶段最有效的策略。本研究的发现有两个方面:第一,处于成熟成长阶段和成熟期的公司在积极推行双策略时获得了最高的销售利润。其次,优先创新的公司通常在所有阶段都表现出更高的能力。这些结果为寻求平衡创新和效率的战略方法的商业从业者提供了有价值的见解和战略指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信