The 15-minute challenge: Evaluating the gaps in accessibility and urban mobility

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Constantin Marius Profiroiu , Daniela-Luminița Constantin , Alina Georgiana Profiroiu , Camelia Delcea , Ionuț Nica , Ștefan Ionescu , Liviu-Adrian Cotfas
{"title":"The 15-minute challenge: Evaluating the gaps in accessibility and urban mobility","authors":"Constantin Marius Profiroiu ,&nbsp;Daniela-Luminița Constantin ,&nbsp;Alina Georgiana Profiroiu ,&nbsp;Camelia Delcea ,&nbsp;Ionuț Nica ,&nbsp;Ștefan Ionescu ,&nbsp;Liviu-Adrian Cotfas","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of rapid urbanization and growing environmental challenges, the concept of the “15-minute city”, where essential services are accessible within a 15-minute walk or bike ride, has emerged as a key model for sustainable urban planning. This study evaluates the accessibility and urban mobility in Bucharest, Romania, based on this model. Bucharest is considered an appealing case study given the fact that it is facing significant issues with regards to the topic of transportation, emissions and segmented urbanization development, having one of its districts included in the “100 Climate-Neutral Cities by 2030” mission. Using geospatial analysis, statistical descriptions, and cluster analysis performed in Python, access to essential services such as education, healthcare, cultural activities, and mobility across six districts is assessed. The analysis is structured around four composite indices: Accessibility to Learning and Healthcare, Wellbeing and Quality of Life, Essential Services and Mobility, and Food Access and Provision. The findings indicate that District 2 is the most closely aligned with the “15-minute city” criteria, as it demonstrates a high level of service accessibility. Conversely, peripheral districts, such as District 6, demonstrate restricted access to mobility and healthcare services. Cluster analysis further confirmed the disparities between districts in terms of access to infrastructure and services, highlighting the necessity of targeted urban planning and investment. This research underlines the significance of integrated policies in order to improve sustainable urban mobility and mitigate regional disparities in service accessibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104453"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000813","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of rapid urbanization and growing environmental challenges, the concept of the “15-minute city”, where essential services are accessible within a 15-minute walk or bike ride, has emerged as a key model for sustainable urban planning. This study evaluates the accessibility and urban mobility in Bucharest, Romania, based on this model. Bucharest is considered an appealing case study given the fact that it is facing significant issues with regards to the topic of transportation, emissions and segmented urbanization development, having one of its districts included in the “100 Climate-Neutral Cities by 2030” mission. Using geospatial analysis, statistical descriptions, and cluster analysis performed in Python, access to essential services such as education, healthcare, cultural activities, and mobility across six districts is assessed. The analysis is structured around four composite indices: Accessibility to Learning and Healthcare, Wellbeing and Quality of Life, Essential Services and Mobility, and Food Access and Provision. The findings indicate that District 2 is the most closely aligned with the “15-minute city” criteria, as it demonstrates a high level of service accessibility. Conversely, peripheral districts, such as District 6, demonstrate restricted access to mobility and healthcare services. Cluster analysis further confirmed the disparities between districts in terms of access to infrastructure and services, highlighting the necessity of targeted urban planning and investment. This research underlines the significance of integrated policies in order to improve sustainable urban mobility and mitigate regional disparities in service accessibility.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信