Resident support for financial incentives in domestic mineral extraction: Evidence from an experimental survey in major US mineral-producing states

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mahelet G. Fikru , Nhien Nguyen , Kwame Awuah-Offei
{"title":"Resident support for financial incentives in domestic mineral extraction: Evidence from an experimental survey in major US mineral-producing states","authors":"Mahelet G. Fikru ,&nbsp;Nhien Nguyen ,&nbsp;Kwame Awuah-Offei","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several jurisdictions deploy a variety of policy incentives to strengthen the domestic supply chain of minerals and metals needed for the energy transition. However, the public's stance towards using financial incentives (e.g., tax credits) to promote domestic mining and mineral extraction is poorly understood. We administered an experimental survey on 1850 US residents in the top five mineral-producing states: Arizona, Nevada, Minnesota, California, and Texas. The five states are leaders in non-fuel mineral production value, representing regions which stand to benefit the most from mining activities and hence residents’ sentiments could shape policy discussions. Our goal is to understand factors that drive support for policies that promote innovative mineral extraction technologies. The experimental design enables us to study whether individuals would support mining policies when provided with additional information that the incentives would promote environmentally friendly or cost-effective technologies. The survey shows that (1) 58 % of all respondents would support policies promoting innovative mining technologies, (2) 69 % prefer minerals to be sourced from environmentally and socially responsible sources, while 15 % preferred domestic sources, and (3) only 10 % are familiar with energy transition minerals. Regression results suggest that concern for environmental impacts, lack of trust in the mining industry, and preference for using private rather than government funds, would reduce the extent of support for policies that use financial incentives to promote innovative mining technologies. Factors correlated with a higher level of support are ambition for the country's global position in energy transition, mineral independence, and preference for domestic mineral sourcing. Individuals in the treatment group provided with additional information that financial incentives would promote environmentally friendly mining technologies have a higher extent of support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101659"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several jurisdictions deploy a variety of policy incentives to strengthen the domestic supply chain of minerals and metals needed for the energy transition. However, the public's stance towards using financial incentives (e.g., tax credits) to promote domestic mining and mineral extraction is poorly understood. We administered an experimental survey on 1850 US residents in the top five mineral-producing states: Arizona, Nevada, Minnesota, California, and Texas. The five states are leaders in non-fuel mineral production value, representing regions which stand to benefit the most from mining activities and hence residents’ sentiments could shape policy discussions. Our goal is to understand factors that drive support for policies that promote innovative mineral extraction technologies. The experimental design enables us to study whether individuals would support mining policies when provided with additional information that the incentives would promote environmentally friendly or cost-effective technologies. The survey shows that (1) 58 % of all respondents would support policies promoting innovative mining technologies, (2) 69 % prefer minerals to be sourced from environmentally and socially responsible sources, while 15 % preferred domestic sources, and (3) only 10 % are familiar with energy transition minerals. Regression results suggest that concern for environmental impacts, lack of trust in the mining industry, and preference for using private rather than government funds, would reduce the extent of support for policies that use financial incentives to promote innovative mining technologies. Factors correlated with a higher level of support are ambition for the country's global position in energy transition, mineral independence, and preference for domestic mineral sourcing. Individuals in the treatment group provided with additional information that financial incentives would promote environmentally friendly mining technologies have a higher extent of support.
一些辖区采取了各种政策激励措施,以加强能源转型所需的矿产和金属的国内供应链。然而,公众对利用财政激励措施(如税收减免)促进国内采矿和矿产开采的态度却知之甚少。我们对美国五大矿产州的 1850 名居民进行了实验性调查:亚利桑那州、内华达州、明尼苏达州、加利福尼亚州和得克萨斯州。这五个州在非燃料矿产产值方面处于领先地位,代表着从采矿活动中获益最多的地区,因此居民的情绪可能会影响政策讨论。我们的目标是了解推动创新矿物开采技术的政策支持因素。通过实验设计,我们可以研究在获得激励措施将促进环境友好型或成本效益型技术的额外信息时,个人是否会支持采矿政策。调查显示:(1) 58% 的受访者会支持促进创新采矿技术的政策;(2) 69% 的受访者倾向于从对环境和社会负责的来源获取矿产,15% 的受访者倾向于从国内获取矿产;(3) 只有 10% 的受访者熟悉能源转型矿产。回归结果表明,对环境影响的担忧、对采矿业缺乏信任,以及倾向于使用私人资金而不是政府资金,都会降低对使用财政激励措施促进创新采矿技术的政策的支持程度。与较高支持度相关的因素有:对国家在能源转型中的全球地位的雄心、矿产独立性以及对国内矿产来源的偏好。在处理组中,获得了财政激励措施将促进环境友好型采矿技术这一额外信息的个人的支持度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信