Mortality rates and feeding behavior of adult Myllocerus undecimpustulatus undatus Marshall (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) exposed to four biopesticides on peach foliage in field cages
{"title":"Mortality rates and feeding behavior of adult Myllocerus undecimpustulatus undatus Marshall (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) exposed to four biopesticides on peach foliage in field cages","authors":"Anita S. Neal, Pasco B. Avery, Ronald D. Cave","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mortality and feeding damage of <em>Myllocerus undecimpustulatus undatus</em> Marshall (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) exposed to four biopesticides on peach foliage in field cages were assessed at two sites in Florida. Two branches (one for caging weevils and one with no cage) with 6–8 leaves without evidence of herbivory were tagged on each of 25 trees at each site. Before treatment applications, one leaf was collected from each uncaged branch for a baseline assessment of endemic entomopathogenic fungal propagules and spray drift. Treatments were three entomopathogenic fungus-based formulations (BotaniGard®ES, PFR-97™ 20 % WDG, and Met52® EC), one azadirachtin formulation (AzaMax™), and distilled water as a control. Branches tagged for caging were sprayed with either one of the three fungal biopesticide treatments at a concentration of 10<sup>7</sup> propagules per ml, an azadirachtin formulation, or distilled water until runoff and then allowed to air dry. One leaf was randomly selected from each sprayed branch for propagule deposition assessment. Five adult <em>M. undecimpustulatus undatus</em> were placed in each cage (five cages per treatment) and left for 15 days after which survivorship and herbivory were assessed across three trials at each site (15 total replicates per treatment per site). All biopesticide treatments resulted in higher weevil mortality compared to the water control. BotaniGard caused approximately four times higher mortality than the other fungal treatments and 78 % mycosis. Mean damage rating index values were highest in the control treatment, followed by BotaniGard ≥ PFR-97 ≥ Met52 = AzaMax. The high mortality rates caused by BotaniGard and reduced feeding caused by AzaMaz suggest that adult <em>M. undecimpustulatus undatus</em> populations might be managed in the field by combining these two biopesticides.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 107218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mortality and feeding damage of Myllocerus undecimpustulatus undatus Marshall (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) exposed to four biopesticides on peach foliage in field cages were assessed at two sites in Florida. Two branches (one for caging weevils and one with no cage) with 6–8 leaves without evidence of herbivory were tagged on each of 25 trees at each site. Before treatment applications, one leaf was collected from each uncaged branch for a baseline assessment of endemic entomopathogenic fungal propagules and spray drift. Treatments were three entomopathogenic fungus-based formulations (BotaniGard®ES, PFR-97™ 20 % WDG, and Met52® EC), one azadirachtin formulation (AzaMax™), and distilled water as a control. Branches tagged for caging were sprayed with either one of the three fungal biopesticide treatments at a concentration of 107 propagules per ml, an azadirachtin formulation, or distilled water until runoff and then allowed to air dry. One leaf was randomly selected from each sprayed branch for propagule deposition assessment. Five adult M. undecimpustulatus undatus were placed in each cage (five cages per treatment) and left for 15 days after which survivorship and herbivory were assessed across three trials at each site (15 total replicates per treatment per site). All biopesticide treatments resulted in higher weevil mortality compared to the water control. BotaniGard caused approximately four times higher mortality than the other fungal treatments and 78 % mycosis. Mean damage rating index values were highest in the control treatment, followed by BotaniGard ≥ PFR-97 ≥ Met52 = AzaMax. The high mortality rates caused by BotaniGard and reduced feeding caused by AzaMaz suggest that adult M. undecimpustulatus undatus populations might be managed in the field by combining these two biopesticides.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.