Energy-saving and visual-thermal performance of multi-sectional DSF system in a typical office room across five climate zones in China

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Feng Shi , Chenyuan Zheng , Junwei Lin , Xuan Yang , Yilin You , Mengsheng Yang , Xiaoqiang Hong
{"title":"Energy-saving and visual-thermal performance of multi-sectional DSF system in a typical office room across five climate zones in China","authors":"Feng Shi ,&nbsp;Chenyuan Zheng ,&nbsp;Junwei Lin ,&nbsp;Xuan Yang ,&nbsp;Yilin You ,&nbsp;Mengsheng Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The multi-sectional double-skin façade (DSF) system, which combines with Venetian blinds (VBs), ventilation valves and a light shelf system, can dynamically respond to climatic conditions through control strategies, offering great potential in enhancing building energy performance and visual-thermal comfort. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the multi-sectional DSF system through experimental and simulation approaches, with a focus on comparing three cases across five climate zones in China: a single-glazed window with VBs (Case 1), a naturally ventilated DSF with VBs (Case 2), and the multi-sectional DSF system (Case 3). To achieve this, experiments on the indoor daylighting and thermal performance of the multi-sectional DSF system were carried out. The building performance simulation model was set up and validated to evaluate the annual visual-thermal comfort and energy performance of the system. The results showed that: (1) Case 3 achieved the lowest annual EUI, with reductions of 9.6 %-17.1 % compared to Case 1 and 0.7 %-15.5 % compared to Case 2 across five climate zones. (2) Case 3 significantly improved indoor daylight quality, with sUDI<sub>300–3000</sub> <sub>lx</sub> increasing by 8.4 %-21.6 % compared to Case 1 and by 27.4 %-42.2 % compared to Case 2. (3) For overheating discomfort, the average PPD<sub>overheating</sub> in Case 3 was 1.3 %-5.1 % lower than in Case 1 but 6.1 %-11.4 % higher than in Case 2 across five climate zones, while the average PPD<sub>overcooling</sub> was 1.3 %-3.4 % lower than in Case 1 and -1.3 %-4.2 % lower than in Case 2 across five climate zones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 112945"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004275","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The multi-sectional double-skin façade (DSF) system, which combines with Venetian blinds (VBs), ventilation valves and a light shelf system, can dynamically respond to climatic conditions through control strategies, offering great potential in enhancing building energy performance and visual-thermal comfort. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the multi-sectional DSF system through experimental and simulation approaches, with a focus on comparing three cases across five climate zones in China: a single-glazed window with VBs (Case 1), a naturally ventilated DSF with VBs (Case 2), and the multi-sectional DSF system (Case 3). To achieve this, experiments on the indoor daylighting and thermal performance of the multi-sectional DSF system were carried out. The building performance simulation model was set up and validated to evaluate the annual visual-thermal comfort and energy performance of the system. The results showed that: (1) Case 3 achieved the lowest annual EUI, with reductions of 9.6 %-17.1 % compared to Case 1 and 0.7 %-15.5 % compared to Case 2 across five climate zones. (2) Case 3 significantly improved indoor daylight quality, with sUDI300–3000 lx increasing by 8.4 %-21.6 % compared to Case 1 and by 27.4 %-42.2 % compared to Case 2. (3) For overheating discomfort, the average PPDoverheating in Case 3 was 1.3 %-5.1 % lower than in Case 1 but 6.1 %-11.4 % higher than in Case 2 across five climate zones, while the average PPDovercooling was 1.3 %-3.4 % lower than in Case 1 and -1.3 %-4.2 % lower than in Case 2 across five climate zones.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信