Feng Shi , Chenyuan Zheng , Junwei Lin , Xuan Yang , Yilin You , Mengsheng Yang , Xiaoqiang Hong
{"title":"Energy-saving and visual-thermal performance of multi-sectional DSF system in a typical office room across five climate zones in China","authors":"Feng Shi , Chenyuan Zheng , Junwei Lin , Xuan Yang , Yilin You , Mengsheng Yang , Xiaoqiang Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The multi-sectional double-skin façade (DSF) system, which combines with Venetian blinds (VBs), ventilation valves and a light shelf system, can dynamically respond to climatic conditions through control strategies, offering great potential in enhancing building energy performance and visual-thermal comfort. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the multi-sectional DSF system through experimental and simulation approaches, with a focus on comparing three cases across five climate zones in China: a single-glazed window with VBs (Case 1), a naturally ventilated DSF with VBs (Case 2), and the multi-sectional DSF system (Case 3). To achieve this, experiments on the indoor daylighting and thermal performance of the multi-sectional DSF system were carried out. The building performance simulation model was set up and validated to evaluate the annual visual-thermal comfort and energy performance of the system. The results showed that: (1) Case 3 achieved the lowest annual EUI, with reductions of 9.6 %-17.1 % compared to Case 1 and 0.7 %-15.5 % compared to Case 2 across five climate zones. (2) Case 3 significantly improved indoor daylight quality, with sUDI<sub>300–3000</sub> <sub>lx</sub> increasing by 8.4 %-21.6 % compared to Case 1 and by 27.4 %-42.2 % compared to Case 2. (3) For overheating discomfort, the average PPD<sub>overheating</sub> in Case 3 was 1.3 %-5.1 % lower than in Case 1 but 6.1 %-11.4 % higher than in Case 2 across five climate zones, while the average PPD<sub>overcooling</sub> was 1.3 %-3.4 % lower than in Case 1 and -1.3 %-4.2 % lower than in Case 2 across five climate zones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 112945"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004275","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The multi-sectional double-skin façade (DSF) system, which combines with Venetian blinds (VBs), ventilation valves and a light shelf system, can dynamically respond to climatic conditions through control strategies, offering great potential in enhancing building energy performance and visual-thermal comfort. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the multi-sectional DSF system through experimental and simulation approaches, with a focus on comparing three cases across five climate zones in China: a single-glazed window with VBs (Case 1), a naturally ventilated DSF with VBs (Case 2), and the multi-sectional DSF system (Case 3). To achieve this, experiments on the indoor daylighting and thermal performance of the multi-sectional DSF system were carried out. The building performance simulation model was set up and validated to evaluate the annual visual-thermal comfort and energy performance of the system. The results showed that: (1) Case 3 achieved the lowest annual EUI, with reductions of 9.6 %-17.1 % compared to Case 1 and 0.7 %-15.5 % compared to Case 2 across five climate zones. (2) Case 3 significantly improved indoor daylight quality, with sUDI300–3000lx increasing by 8.4 %-21.6 % compared to Case 1 and by 27.4 %-42.2 % compared to Case 2. (3) For overheating discomfort, the average PPDoverheating in Case 3 was 1.3 %-5.1 % lower than in Case 1 but 6.1 %-11.4 % higher than in Case 2 across five climate zones, while the average PPDovercooling was 1.3 %-3.4 % lower than in Case 1 and -1.3 %-4.2 % lower than in Case 2 across five climate zones.
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.