Compliance to select sections of cigarettes and other tobacco products act (COTPA) around PoS and perception of tobacco vendors about tobacco control policies and vendor licensing: A mixed method study from four districts of a South Indian state

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sneha D. Mallya , Praveen Kumar , Rohith Bhagawath , Afraz Jahan , Radhika Nayak , Muralidhar M. Kulkarni
{"title":"Compliance to select sections of cigarettes and other tobacco products act (COTPA) around PoS and perception of tobacco vendors about tobacco control policies and vendor licensing: A mixed method study from four districts of a South Indian state","authors":"Sneha D. Mallya ,&nbsp;Praveen Kumar ,&nbsp;Rohith Bhagawath ,&nbsp;Afraz Jahan ,&nbsp;Radhika Nayak ,&nbsp;Muralidhar M. Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.101999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem considered</h3><div>Tobacco control is challenging due to the easy availability of tobacco products and the sub-optimal implementation of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA). Preventing tobacco uptake and controlling sales requires innovative approaches. The study was conducted to assess compliance with relevant sections of COTPA and understand the perception of tobacco vendors about tobacco control policies, including the new vendor licensing initiative.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate compliance with section 4, 5, 6 and 20 of COTPA across four city corporations of Karnataka using a checklist at the point of sale (PoS). A fixed point was randomly chosen in each city corporation, and the research team visited consecutive shops in a clockwise direction until the required number was reached. A qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted among vendors selling tobacco products to understand their perception of current tobacco control policies and vendor licensing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 1379 shops surveyed across four city corporations of Karnataka, 616 (44.6 %) were selling tobacco products. Compliance to various provisions of section 4,5,6 and 20 of COTPA was suboptimal. Vendors said that only strict implementation of COTPA provisions can aid in tobacco control. Vendors displayed a positive attitude toward the new vendor licensing law. They emphasized the requirement of a simple procedure and expected the tobacco industry to support them in obtaining the license. Vendors opined that a higher fee for licensing could act as a deterrent to continue tobacco sales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The survey highlights significant tobacco sales among shops in Karnataka, with nearly half involved. Despite suboptimal compliance with COTPA provisions, vendors show willingness to adhere if strictly enforced. Positive reception towards the new vendor licensing law suggests a streamlined process could enhance compliance. However, vendors' expectation of support from the tobacco industry for licensing requires caution, as it may influence tobacco control measures. Higher licensing fees might discourage tobacco sales, aiding control efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425000880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem considered

Tobacco control is challenging due to the easy availability of tobacco products and the sub-optimal implementation of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA). Preventing tobacco uptake and controlling sales requires innovative approaches. The study was conducted to assess compliance with relevant sections of COTPA and understand the perception of tobacco vendors about tobacco control policies, including the new vendor licensing initiative.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate compliance with section 4, 5, 6 and 20 of COTPA across four city corporations of Karnataka using a checklist at the point of sale (PoS). A fixed point was randomly chosen in each city corporation, and the research team visited consecutive shops in a clockwise direction until the required number was reached. A qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted among vendors selling tobacco products to understand their perception of current tobacco control policies and vendor licensing.

Results

Out of 1379 shops surveyed across four city corporations of Karnataka, 616 (44.6 %) were selling tobacco products. Compliance to various provisions of section 4,5,6 and 20 of COTPA was suboptimal. Vendors said that only strict implementation of COTPA provisions can aid in tobacco control. Vendors displayed a positive attitude toward the new vendor licensing law. They emphasized the requirement of a simple procedure and expected the tobacco industry to support them in obtaining the license. Vendors opined that a higher fee for licensing could act as a deterrent to continue tobacco sales.

Conclusion

The survey highlights significant tobacco sales among shops in Karnataka, with nearly half involved. Despite suboptimal compliance with COTPA provisions, vendors show willingness to adhere if strictly enforced. Positive reception towards the new vendor licensing law suggests a streamlined process could enhance compliance. However, vendors' expectation of support from the tobacco industry for licensing requires caution, as it may influence tobacco control measures. Higher licensing fees might discourage tobacco sales, aiding control efforts.
烟草供应商对烟草控制政策和供应商许可的看法:一项来自南印度一个邦四个地区的混合方法研究
考虑到的问题烟草控制具有挑战性,因为烟草制品容易获得,而《卷烟和其他烟草制品法》(COTPA)的实施不理想。防止吸烟和控制销售需要创新的方法。进行这项研究的目的是评估对《禁止烟草贸易协定》相关章节的遵守情况,并了解烟草销售商对烟草控制政策的看法,包括新的销售商许可倡议。方法采用一项横断面研究,在卡纳塔克邦的四个城市公司中使用销售点检查表来评估COTPA第4、5、6和20条的遵守情况。研究小组在每个城市公社随机选择一个定点,按顺时针方向连续走访店铺,直到达到要求的数量。对销售烟草制品的摊贩进行了深入访谈的定性研究,以了解他们对当前烟草控制政策和摊贩许可的看法。结果在卡纳塔克邦四个城市公司调查的1379家商店中,616家(44.6%)销售烟草制品。对COTPA第4、5、6和20条各项规定的遵守情况并不理想。商贩们说,只有严格执行《禁止烟草贸易协定》的规定,才能帮助控制烟草。供应商对新的供应商许可法表现出积极的态度。他们强调需要一个简单的程序,并期望烟草业支持他们获得许可证。烟草商认为,提高许可证费用可能会对继续销售烟草起到威慑作用。该调查突出了卡纳塔克邦商店中重要的烟草销售,其中近一半涉及烟草销售。尽管对COTPA规定的遵从不是最优的,但如果严格执行,供应商表示愿意遵守。对新的供应商许可法的积极反应表明,简化的流程可以提高合规性。然而,销售商期望烟草业支持发放许可证需要谨慎,因为这可能影响烟草控制措施。更高的许可费可能会阻碍烟草销售,从而有助于控制烟草。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信