Epistemic mistrust mediates the association between childhood maltreatment and impairments in mentalizing in a sample of university students

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Nicola-Hans Schwarzer , Nöelle Behringer , Paula Dees , Stephan Gingelmaier , Melanie Henter , Holger Kirsch , Tillmann Kreuzer , Robert Langnickel , Pierre-Carl Link , Sascha Müller , Agnes Turner , Peter Fonagy , Tobias Nolte
{"title":"Epistemic mistrust mediates the association between childhood maltreatment and impairments in mentalizing in a sample of university students","authors":"Nicola-Hans Schwarzer ,&nbsp;Nöelle Behringer ,&nbsp;Paula Dees ,&nbsp;Stephan Gingelmaier ,&nbsp;Melanie Henter ,&nbsp;Holger Kirsch ,&nbsp;Tillmann Kreuzer ,&nbsp;Robert Langnickel ,&nbsp;Pierre-Carl Link ,&nbsp;Sascha Müller ,&nbsp;Agnes Turner ,&nbsp;Peter Fonagy ,&nbsp;Tobias Nolte","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mentalizing is linked to mental health development and psychosocial functioning. Identifying and understanding the factors that may be associated with ineffective mentalizing is crucial for creating targeted psychosocial or psychotherapeutic interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This exploratory study assesses whether experiences of childhood maltreatment, along with attachment insecurity and epistemic mistrust, are associated with limitations in mentalizing abilities.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>A total of 382 primarily young adults from different universities completed questionnaires about their childhood maltreatment experiences (retrospectively assessed), attachment insecurity, epistemic mistrust, and ineffective mentalizing, using a cross-sectional study design. All participants were pursuing a degree in educational fields.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Structural equation modeling was applied to test the hypothesized framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant positive associations between experiences of childhood maltreatment, epistemic mistrust (<em>β</em> = 0.32 [0.17–0.46], <em>p</em> = .001), and attachment insecurity (<em>β</em> = 0.29 [0.18–0.40], <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Epistemic mistrust fully mediated the relationship between childhood maltreatment and ineffective mentalizing (<em>β</em> = 0.17 [0.08–0.28], <em>p</em> = .001). However, attachment insecurity did not mediate this link.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This exploratory study sheds light on the development of mentalizing impairments, though it is limited by its cross-sectional nature, reliance on self-reporting, and the uniformity of the sample with mainly female, primarily young adults from different universities. The preliminary findings suggest the role of attachment insecurity might have been overemphasized previously. Moreover, the link between childhood maltreatment and mentalizing deficits appears more intricate, as it was fully mediated by epistemic mistrust in this study. The findings support the notion of addressing epistemic mistrust in psychosocial interventions designed to improve mentalizing abilities that have been compromised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425001917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mentalizing is linked to mental health development and psychosocial functioning. Identifying and understanding the factors that may be associated with ineffective mentalizing is crucial for creating targeted psychosocial or psychotherapeutic interventions.

Objective

This exploratory study assesses whether experiences of childhood maltreatment, along with attachment insecurity and epistemic mistrust, are associated with limitations in mentalizing abilities.

Participants and setting

A total of 382 primarily young adults from different universities completed questionnaires about their childhood maltreatment experiences (retrospectively assessed), attachment insecurity, epistemic mistrust, and ineffective mentalizing, using a cross-sectional study design. All participants were pursuing a degree in educational fields.

Methods

Structural equation modeling was applied to test the hypothesized framework.

Results

There were significant positive associations between experiences of childhood maltreatment, epistemic mistrust (β = 0.32 [0.17–0.46], p = .001), and attachment insecurity (β = 0.29 [0.18–0.40], p < .001). Epistemic mistrust fully mediated the relationship between childhood maltreatment and ineffective mentalizing (β = 0.17 [0.08–0.28], p = .001). However, attachment insecurity did not mediate this link.

Conclusion

This exploratory study sheds light on the development of mentalizing impairments, though it is limited by its cross-sectional nature, reliance on self-reporting, and the uniformity of the sample with mainly female, primarily young adults from different universities. The preliminary findings suggest the role of attachment insecurity might have been overemphasized previously. Moreover, the link between childhood maltreatment and mentalizing deficits appears more intricate, as it was fully mediated by epistemic mistrust in this study. The findings support the notion of addressing epistemic mistrust in psychosocial interventions designed to improve mentalizing abilities that have been compromised.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信