P. Bombiński , P. Szatkowski , B. Sobieski , T. Kwieciński , S. Płotka , M. Adamek , M. Banasiuk , M.I. Furmanek , P. Biecek
{"title":"Underestimation of lung regions on chest X-ray segmentation masks assessed by comparison with total lung volume evaluated on computed tomography","authors":"P. Bombiński , P. Szatkowski , B. Sobieski , T. Kwieciński , S. Płotka , M. Adamek , M. Banasiuk , M.I. Furmanek , P. Biecek","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The lung regions on chest X-ray segmentation masks created according to the current gold standard method for AI-driven applications are underestimated. This can be evaluated by comparison with computed tomography.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included data from non-contrast chest low-dose CT examinations of 55 individuals without pulmonary pathology. Synthetic X-ray images were generated by projecting a 3D CT examination onto a 2D image plane. Two experienced radiologists manually created two types of lung masks: 3D lung masks from CT examinations (ground truth for further calculations) and 2D lung masks from synthetic X-ray images (according to the current gold standard method: following the contours of other anatomical structures). Overlapping and non-overlapping lung regions covered by both types of masks were analyzed. Volume of the overlapping regions was compared with total lung volume, and volume fractions of non-overlapping lung regions in relation to the total lung volume were calculated. The performance results between the two radiologists were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences were observed between lung regions covered by CT and synthetic X-ray masks. The mean volume fractions of the lung regions not covered by synthetic X-ray masks for the right lung, the left lung, and both lungs were 22.8 %, 32.9 %, and 27.3 %, respectively, for Radiologist 1 and 22.7 %, 32.9 %, and 27.3 %, respectively, for Radiologist 2. There was excellent spatial agreement between the masks created by the two radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lung X-ray masks created according to the current gold standard method significantly underestimate lung regions and do not cover substantial portions of the lungs.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Standard lung masks fail to encompass the whole range of the lungs and significantly restrict the field of analysis in AI-driven applications, which may lead to false conclusions and diagnoses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 102930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The lung regions on chest X-ray segmentation masks created according to the current gold standard method for AI-driven applications are underestimated. This can be evaluated by comparison with computed tomography.
Methods
This retrospective study included data from non-contrast chest low-dose CT examinations of 55 individuals without pulmonary pathology. Synthetic X-ray images were generated by projecting a 3D CT examination onto a 2D image plane. Two experienced radiologists manually created two types of lung masks: 3D lung masks from CT examinations (ground truth for further calculations) and 2D lung masks from synthetic X-ray images (according to the current gold standard method: following the contours of other anatomical structures). Overlapping and non-overlapping lung regions covered by both types of masks were analyzed. Volume of the overlapping regions was compared with total lung volume, and volume fractions of non-overlapping lung regions in relation to the total lung volume were calculated. The performance results between the two radiologists were compared.
Results
Significant differences were observed between lung regions covered by CT and synthetic X-ray masks. The mean volume fractions of the lung regions not covered by synthetic X-ray masks for the right lung, the left lung, and both lungs were 22.8 %, 32.9 %, and 27.3 %, respectively, for Radiologist 1 and 22.7 %, 32.9 %, and 27.3 %, respectively, for Radiologist 2. There was excellent spatial agreement between the masks created by the two radiologists.
Conclusions
Lung X-ray masks created according to the current gold standard method significantly underestimate lung regions and do not cover substantial portions of the lungs.
Implications for practice
Standard lung masks fail to encompass the whole range of the lungs and significantly restrict the field of analysis in AI-driven applications, which may lead to false conclusions and diagnoses.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.