Improving joint identification of groundwater contaminant source and non-Gaussian distributed conductivity field using a deep learning-based ensemble smoother
Lei He , Huan Cheng , Zhengnian Nan , Yiqing Gong , Huifang Guo , Jingqiao Mao , Jiangjiang Zhang
{"title":"Improving joint identification of groundwater contaminant source and non-Gaussian distributed conductivity field using a deep learning-based ensemble smoother","authors":"Lei He , Huan Cheng , Zhengnian Nan , Yiqing Gong , Huifang Guo , Jingqiao Mao , Jiangjiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate simulation of groundwater flow and solute transport is crucial for effective risk assessment and targeted pollution remediation. The inherent complexity of groundwater systems, characterized by elusive contamination sources and heterogeneous aquifer structures, introduces significant uncertainty into model simulations and predictions. Given the difficulty in directly measuring these unknown parameters, their estimation often relies on utilizing indirect observational data (e.g., hydraulic head and solute concentration) with data assimilation (DA) techniques. Traditional DA methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and ensemble smoother with multiple DA (ESMDA) struggle with high dimensionality and non-Gaussianity issues, leading to suboptimal performance in calibrating complex groundwater models. In this study, we introduce an innovative DA approach that integrates ensemble smoother (ES) with deep learning (DL), termed ESDL, designed for joint identification of contaminant source and heterogeneous conductivity field represented by high-dimensional and non-Gaussian distributed parameters. ESDL leverages DL’s robust capabilities in fitting non-linear relationships and discerning complex (including non-Gaussian) features to extract valuable insights from observational data. We systematically evaluate the efficacy of ESDL and ESMDA through three case studies involving 3,329 unknown model parameters with non-Gaussian spatial characteristics (multi-facies and channels, respectively). The impact of biased prior assumptions on identification performance is also investigated. Across these cases, ESDL exhibits superior performance in characterizing non-Gaussian conductivity fields and matching the observations, while ESMDA excels in estimating contaminant source parameters. Both methods demonstrate distinct strengths, underscoring the potential for future research to integrate these approaches for enhanced performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"658 ","pages":"Article 133202"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425005402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate simulation of groundwater flow and solute transport is crucial for effective risk assessment and targeted pollution remediation. The inherent complexity of groundwater systems, characterized by elusive contamination sources and heterogeneous aquifer structures, introduces significant uncertainty into model simulations and predictions. Given the difficulty in directly measuring these unknown parameters, their estimation often relies on utilizing indirect observational data (e.g., hydraulic head and solute concentration) with data assimilation (DA) techniques. Traditional DA methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and ensemble smoother with multiple DA (ESMDA) struggle with high dimensionality and non-Gaussianity issues, leading to suboptimal performance in calibrating complex groundwater models. In this study, we introduce an innovative DA approach that integrates ensemble smoother (ES) with deep learning (DL), termed ESDL, designed for joint identification of contaminant source and heterogeneous conductivity field represented by high-dimensional and non-Gaussian distributed parameters. ESDL leverages DL’s robust capabilities in fitting non-linear relationships and discerning complex (including non-Gaussian) features to extract valuable insights from observational data. We systematically evaluate the efficacy of ESDL and ESMDA through three case studies involving 3,329 unknown model parameters with non-Gaussian spatial characteristics (multi-facies and channels, respectively). The impact of biased prior assumptions on identification performance is also investigated. Across these cases, ESDL exhibits superior performance in characterizing non-Gaussian conductivity fields and matching the observations, while ESMDA excels in estimating contaminant source parameters. Both methods demonstrate distinct strengths, underscoring the potential for future research to integrate these approaches for enhanced performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.