Dietary protein restriction in rats leads to a rapid within-session preference for protein

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Giulia Chiacchierini , Fabien Naneix , John Apergis-Schoute , James E McCutcheon
{"title":"Dietary protein restriction in rats leads to a rapid within-session preference for protein","authors":"Giulia Chiacchierini ,&nbsp;Fabien Naneix ,&nbsp;John Apergis-Schoute ,&nbsp;James E McCutcheon","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.114882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evolution has provided species with adaptive behavioural mechanisms that guarantee tight dietary protein regulation. However, an unsolved question is whether the well-established preference for protein-containing food manifested during states of protein restriction is innate or learned. Here, we tackled this problem by maintaining male rats on either a low-protein diet (4 % protein, protein-restricted) or a control diet (22 % protein, non-restricted) for 9–12 days, and then offered them two novel foods, a protein-containing solution (4 % casein) and a carbohydrate-containing solution (4 % maltodextrin) during a daily 60-minute free-choice test, repeated for 5 consecutive days. We assessed both the total and cumulative intake of each solution throughout each test, as well as the microstructure of licking behaviour as an index of the solutions’ palatability. In a second experiment, we exposed a different cohort of rats, before any behavioural test, to the same protein source (i.e., casein) that they would encounter during the free-choice tests, to assess whether familiarity with casein would drive subsequent casein intake even in non-restricted rats. We found that dietary protein restriction leads to a rapid preference (within 5 min of first exposure) for a casein-rich solution, and this preference is persistent over subsequent exposures. Increased palatability of protein during initial exposure correlated with protein preference in the restricted rats. Moreover, familiarity with casein did not lead to protein preference in non-restricted rats. This study demonstrates that, when in need of protein, protein preference is a rapid adaptation that requires minimal experience of protein.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"295 ","pages":"Article 114882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425000836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evolution has provided species with adaptive behavioural mechanisms that guarantee tight dietary protein regulation. However, an unsolved question is whether the well-established preference for protein-containing food manifested during states of protein restriction is innate or learned. Here, we tackled this problem by maintaining male rats on either a low-protein diet (4 % protein, protein-restricted) or a control diet (22 % protein, non-restricted) for 9–12 days, and then offered them two novel foods, a protein-containing solution (4 % casein) and a carbohydrate-containing solution (4 % maltodextrin) during a daily 60-minute free-choice test, repeated for 5 consecutive days. We assessed both the total and cumulative intake of each solution throughout each test, as well as the microstructure of licking behaviour as an index of the solutions’ palatability. In a second experiment, we exposed a different cohort of rats, before any behavioural test, to the same protein source (i.e., casein) that they would encounter during the free-choice tests, to assess whether familiarity with casein would drive subsequent casein intake even in non-restricted rats. We found that dietary protein restriction leads to a rapid preference (within 5 min of first exposure) for a casein-rich solution, and this preference is persistent over subsequent exposures. Increased palatability of protein during initial exposure correlated with protein preference in the restricted rats. Moreover, familiarity with casein did not lead to protein preference in non-restricted rats. This study demonstrates that, when in need of protein, protein preference is a rapid adaptation that requires minimal experience of protein.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信