The relationship between skill variety, boredom proneness, and employee engagement

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Brent C. Ward
{"title":"The relationship between skill variety, boredom proneness, and employee engagement","authors":"Brent C. Ward","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing on theory regarding workplace boredom, the aim of this research was to determine the extent to which boredom proneness moderates the relationship between skill variety and employee engagement within the Job Characteristics Model (JCM). Employed adults in the continental United States provided 344 responses to surveys that measured skill variety, boredom proneness, and employee engagement. The data revealed that boredom proneness amplified the skill variety-engagement relationship as hypothesized (β = 0.186, <em>p</em> <em>&lt;</em> 0.001, <em>t</em> = 3.423, <em>f</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.054). Contributions of the study include illuminating the negative, direct influence of boredom proneness on employee engagement and revealing that boredom proneness tends to decrease with age. The cross-sectional nature of the study, reliance on self-report scales, and underrepresentation of young adult employees are considered limitations of the study. The study also addresses how screening employees for boredom proneness can mitigate the effects of boredom on the job. Boredom-prone employees can implement error-checking techniques, self-actualization measures, and additional education to improve their performance or allow them to move into jobs requiring higher skill variety. Suggestions for future research include expanding the analysis to working teenagers and to other moderators in the JCM that demonstrate a strong linkage to the remaining JCM characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 113187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on theory regarding workplace boredom, the aim of this research was to determine the extent to which boredom proneness moderates the relationship between skill variety and employee engagement within the Job Characteristics Model (JCM). Employed adults in the continental United States provided 344 responses to surveys that measured skill variety, boredom proneness, and employee engagement. The data revealed that boredom proneness amplified the skill variety-engagement relationship as hypothesized (β = 0.186, p < 0.001, t = 3.423, f2 = 0.054). Contributions of the study include illuminating the negative, direct influence of boredom proneness on employee engagement and revealing that boredom proneness tends to decrease with age. The cross-sectional nature of the study, reliance on self-report scales, and underrepresentation of young adult employees are considered limitations of the study. The study also addresses how screening employees for boredom proneness can mitigate the effects of boredom on the job. Boredom-prone employees can implement error-checking techniques, self-actualization measures, and additional education to improve their performance or allow them to move into jobs requiring higher skill variety. Suggestions for future research include expanding the analysis to working teenagers and to other moderators in the JCM that demonstrate a strong linkage to the remaining JCM characteristics.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信