{"title":"US-China decoupling and the Chinese firms’ real option to defer overall but R&D investment","authors":"Liang Shao , Zaiyang Xie , Yixin Qiu , Liang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The evolving decoupling between the U.S. and China, and the resulting bifurcation of the global economy, represents one of the biggest external uncertainties in international business since the end of the Cold War. From a real options perspective, this study conducted a content analysis of the annual reports of Chinese publicly-listed firms (2016–2021) to capture how these firms perceived the uncertainty stemming from decoupling and adjusted their investment strategies accordingly. The data show that the perception of decoupling uncertainty, and associated concerns of the economic downturn and profitability, triggered Chinese firms to defer overall investments. The impact is limited to manufacturing industries where investment typically is more irreversible, and private firms’ investment decisions are more subjective to the uncertainty. Moreover, the impact differs across different types of investments: decoupling uncertainty affects capital expenditure but not R&D investment. Our study sheds light on the manifestations of decoupling in firm-level investment strategies. Furthermore, the study answers the call to incorporate subjective judgment of uncertainty in the real options theory by revealing the impact of perceived uncertainty on different types of firm investments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Business","volume":"60 4","pages":"Article 101643"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Business","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109095162500032X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The evolving decoupling between the U.S. and China, and the resulting bifurcation of the global economy, represents one of the biggest external uncertainties in international business since the end of the Cold War. From a real options perspective, this study conducted a content analysis of the annual reports of Chinese publicly-listed firms (2016–2021) to capture how these firms perceived the uncertainty stemming from decoupling and adjusted their investment strategies accordingly. The data show that the perception of decoupling uncertainty, and associated concerns of the economic downturn and profitability, triggered Chinese firms to defer overall investments. The impact is limited to manufacturing industries where investment typically is more irreversible, and private firms’ investment decisions are more subjective to the uncertainty. Moreover, the impact differs across different types of investments: decoupling uncertainty affects capital expenditure but not R&D investment. Our study sheds light on the manifestations of decoupling in firm-level investment strategies. Furthermore, the study answers the call to incorporate subjective judgment of uncertainty in the real options theory by revealing the impact of perceived uncertainty on different types of firm investments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of World Business holds a distinguished position as a leading publication within the realm of International Business. Rooted in a legacy dating back to 1965, when it was established as the Columbia Journal of World Business, JWB is committed to disseminating cutting-edge research that reflects significant advancements in the field. The journal actively seeks submissions that propel new theoretical frameworks and innovative perspectives on International Business phenomena. Aligned with its domain statement, submissions are expected to possess a clear multinational, cross-border, or international comparative focus, while remaining pertinent to the study of management and organizations. JWB particularly encourages submissions that challenge established theories or assumptions, presenting pioneering or counterintuitive findings. With an inclusive approach, the journal welcomes contributions from diverse conceptual and theoretical traditions, encompassing allied social sciences and behavioral sciences. Submissions should either develop new theories or rigorously test existing ones, employing a variety of qualitative, quantitative, or other methodological approaches. While JWB primarily caters to scholars and researchers, it values contributions that explore implications for Multinational Enterprises and their management, as well as ramifications for public policy and the broader societal role of business.