{"title":"A perspective on emerging policy and economics research priorities for enabling low-carbon trucking","authors":"Rubal Dua, Saif Almutairi","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trucking plays a crucial role in sustaining economic activity worldwide, yet its current path of carbon emissions is out of sync with the net-zero goals set by governments globally. As a result, identifying key energy economic and policy research priorities for low-carbon trucking has become increasingly important. In this perspective, we tackle this need with a four-part approach: (i) identifying pressing issues highlighted in the news media; (ii) formulating feasible and novel economic and policy research challenges that address these contemporary concerns; (iii) cross-referencing these research challenges with academic literature to confirm their relevance and refining them as needed; and (iv) prioritizing the identified research challenges through consultations with a diverse group of transport experts specializing in fuels, policy, technology, and infrastructure. Our findings reveal seven key themes, each with its own set of research challenges. Among these, the expert prioritized policy and economic research challenges include — (i) high-power charging and battery swapping for battery electric trucks, focusing on market preferences, standardization (chargers vs. batteries), national strategies, and business models; (ii) optimal allocation of government subsidies between deployment of zero tailpipe emission trucks, including battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks, versus refueling/recharging infrastructure deployment; and (iii) a comparative cost-benefit analysis of the EU's tailpipe versus lifecycle carbon emissions regulations for new trucks. These priorities can guide both industry and academic research toward generating practical recommendations for industry stakeholders and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104025"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Trucking plays a crucial role in sustaining economic activity worldwide, yet its current path of carbon emissions is out of sync with the net-zero goals set by governments globally. As a result, identifying key energy economic and policy research priorities for low-carbon trucking has become increasingly important. In this perspective, we tackle this need with a four-part approach: (i) identifying pressing issues highlighted in the news media; (ii) formulating feasible and novel economic and policy research challenges that address these contemporary concerns; (iii) cross-referencing these research challenges with academic literature to confirm their relevance and refining them as needed; and (iv) prioritizing the identified research challenges through consultations with a diverse group of transport experts specializing in fuels, policy, technology, and infrastructure. Our findings reveal seven key themes, each with its own set of research challenges. Among these, the expert prioritized policy and economic research challenges include — (i) high-power charging and battery swapping for battery electric trucks, focusing on market preferences, standardization (chargers vs. batteries), national strategies, and business models; (ii) optimal allocation of government subsidies between deployment of zero tailpipe emission trucks, including battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks, versus refueling/recharging infrastructure deployment; and (iii) a comparative cost-benefit analysis of the EU's tailpipe versus lifecycle carbon emissions regulations for new trucks. These priorities can guide both industry and academic research toward generating practical recommendations for industry stakeholders and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.