Applicability of existing criteria of rockburst tendency of sandstone in coal mines

IF 11.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING
Tianqi Nan , Linming Dou , Piotr Małkowski , Wu Cai , Haobing Li , Shun Liu
{"title":"Applicability of existing criteria of rockburst tendency of sandstone in coal mines","authors":"Tianqi Nan ,&nbsp;Linming Dou ,&nbsp;Piotr Małkowski ,&nbsp;Wu Cai ,&nbsp;Haobing Li ,&nbsp;Shun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To evaluate the accuracy of rockburst tendency classification in coal-bearing sandstone strata, this study conducted uniaxial compression loading and unloading tests on sandstone samples with four distinct grain sizes. The tests involved loading the samples to 60%, 70%, and 80% of their uniaxial compressive strength, followed by unloading and reloading until failure. Key parameters such as the elastic energy index and linear elasticity criteria were derived from these tests. Additionally, rock fragments were collected to calculate their initial ejection kinetic energy, serving as a measure of rockburst tendency. The classification of rockburst tendency was conducted using grading methods based on burst energy index (<em>W</em><sub>ET</sub>), pre-peak stored elastic energy (PES) and experimental observations. Multi-class classification and regression analyses were applied to machine learning models using experimental data to predict rockburst tendency levels. A comparative analysis of models from two libraries revealed that the Random Forest model achieved the highest accuracy in classification, while the AdaBoost Regressor model excelled in regression predictions. This study highlights that on a laboratory scale, integrating ejection kinetic energy with the unloading ratio, failure load, <em>W</em><sub>ET</sub> and PES through machine learning offers a highly accurate and reliable approach for determining rockburst tendency levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48625,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 417-431"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mining Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268625000217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of rockburst tendency classification in coal-bearing sandstone strata, this study conducted uniaxial compression loading and unloading tests on sandstone samples with four distinct grain sizes. The tests involved loading the samples to 60%, 70%, and 80% of their uniaxial compressive strength, followed by unloading and reloading until failure. Key parameters such as the elastic energy index and linear elasticity criteria were derived from these tests. Additionally, rock fragments were collected to calculate their initial ejection kinetic energy, serving as a measure of rockburst tendency. The classification of rockburst tendency was conducted using grading methods based on burst energy index (WET), pre-peak stored elastic energy (PES) and experimental observations. Multi-class classification and regression analyses were applied to machine learning models using experimental data to predict rockburst tendency levels. A comparative analysis of models from two libraries revealed that the Random Forest model achieved the highest accuracy in classification, while the AdaBoost Regressor model excelled in regression predictions. This study highlights that on a laboratory scale, integrating ejection kinetic energy with the unloading ratio, failure load, WET and PES through machine learning offers a highly accurate and reliable approach for determining rockburst tendency levels.
煤矿砂岩岩爆倾向性现有判据的适用性
为评价含煤砂岩地层岩爆倾向分类的准确性,本研究对4种不同粒度砂岩试样进行了单轴压缩加卸载试验。试验包括将样品加载到其单轴抗压强度的60%,70%和80%,然后卸载和重新加载直到破坏。在此基础上推导出弹性能指数和线性弹性准则等关键参数。此外,还收集了岩石碎片,计算其初始弹射动能,作为岩爆倾向的衡量标准。采用基于冲击能量指数(WET)、峰前储存弹性能(PES)和实验观测值的分级方法对岩爆倾向性进行分类。利用实验数据对机器学习模型进行多类分类和回归分析,预测岩爆趋势水平。通过对两个库的模型进行比较分析,发现Random Forest模型在分类方面的准确率最高,而AdaBoost Regressor模型在回归预测方面的准确率最高。该研究强调,在实验室规模上,通过机器学习将弹射动能与卸载比、破坏载荷、WET和PES相结合,为确定岩爆倾向水平提供了一种高度准确和可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
2541
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, founded in 1990 as the Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, is a monthly English-language journal. It publishes original research papers and high-quality reviews that explore the latest advancements in theories, methodologies, and applications within the realm of mining sciences and technologies. The journal serves as an international exchange forum for readers and authors worldwide involved in mining sciences and technologies. All papers undergo a peer-review process and meticulous editing by specialists and authorities, with the entire submission-to-publication process conducted electronically.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信