Race, wealth and health: The role of reparations

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shannon Whittaker , Marie-Fatima Hyacinthe , Danya Keene , Akilah Dulin , Trace Kershaw , Joshua Warren
{"title":"Race, wealth and health: The role of reparations","authors":"Shannon Whittaker ,&nbsp;Marie-Fatima Hyacinthe ,&nbsp;Danya Keene ,&nbsp;Akilah Dulin ,&nbsp;Trace Kershaw ,&nbsp;Joshua Warren","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to the ongoing legacy of structurally racist policies and practices in the U.S., Black Americans face great challenges to wealth accumulation and, as a result, may be more likely to report adverse health outcomes. However, little research has examined the potential impact of racial justice interventions like reparations on closing the racial health gap.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979, multi-level regression models were employed to assess race and wealth as predictors of self-rated health across general health, physical health, and mental health. Predicted probabilities analyzed the probability of reporting better health with the inclusion of three reparation estimations to Black respondents' wealth: Darity's land-based estimation, Craemer's wage-based estimation and the racial wealth gap.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final sample included 2471 respondents. Race was a significant predictor of general health, with White respondents more likely to report excellent/very good health (OR = 1.35, p = 0.0047) compared to Black respondents. Wealth was a significant predictor for all health variables, with increased wealth linked to better health. In predicted probability models, reparations payments were associated with health such that as payments increased so did the probability of improved health for Black respondents across all three health measures. Only general health reported significant mean differences across race.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reparations payments may help narrow the racial health gap. However, reparative justice interventions should look beyond only using monetary reparations payments to dismantle systems of oppression that perpetuate current inequities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 117963"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500293X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to the ongoing legacy of structurally racist policies and practices in the U.S., Black Americans face great challenges to wealth accumulation and, as a result, may be more likely to report adverse health outcomes. However, little research has examined the potential impact of racial justice interventions like reparations on closing the racial health gap.

Methods

Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979, multi-level regression models were employed to assess race and wealth as predictors of self-rated health across general health, physical health, and mental health. Predicted probabilities analyzed the probability of reporting better health with the inclusion of three reparation estimations to Black respondents' wealth: Darity's land-based estimation, Craemer's wage-based estimation and the racial wealth gap.

Results

The final sample included 2471 respondents. Race was a significant predictor of general health, with White respondents more likely to report excellent/very good health (OR = 1.35, p = 0.0047) compared to Black respondents. Wealth was a significant predictor for all health variables, with increased wealth linked to better health. In predicted probability models, reparations payments were associated with health such that as payments increased so did the probability of improved health for Black respondents across all three health measures. Only general health reported significant mean differences across race.

Conclusion

Reparations payments may help narrow the racial health gap. However, reparative justice interventions should look beyond only using monetary reparations payments to dismantle systems of oppression that perpetuate current inequities.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信