Francis Megerlin , Gilles Bouvenot , Patrice Queneau
{"title":"Déprescription et responsabilité médicale","authors":"Francis Megerlin , Gilles Bouvenot , Patrice Queneau","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deprescribing aim to improve the clinical condition of patients, through progressively reducing and/or discontinuing certain drug treatments. This paper reports its conceptual genesis and gradual diffusion, the dynamics of practitioners/healthcare insurer agreements in France, and medical liability. Irrespective of any incentive agreement, consideration of the advisability of de-prescribing has become mandatory in situations where iatrogenic risks are well established – particularly in the case of multi-medication treatments: as knowledge grows, failure to deprescribe (or to consider the advisability of doing so) could be considered a fault. However, de-prescribing is not a quantitative approach, due to its clinical purpose and consequences: it requires gathering scattered data, prioritizing treatments, planning, and sometimes arbitrating between therapeutic intentions. Interprofessional collaboration is then served by new tools and informed by experience-sharing: they alone can meet the clinical and societal challenge of deprescribing, while dedicated algorithms and AI are coming.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2025 191","pages":"Pages 46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deprescribing aim to improve the clinical condition of patients, through progressively reducing and/or discontinuing certain drug treatments. This paper reports its conceptual genesis and gradual diffusion, the dynamics of practitioners/healthcare insurer agreements in France, and medical liability. Irrespective of any incentive agreement, consideration of the advisability of de-prescribing has become mandatory in situations where iatrogenic risks are well established – particularly in the case of multi-medication treatments: as knowledge grows, failure to deprescribe (or to consider the advisability of doing so) could be considered a fault. However, de-prescribing is not a quantitative approach, due to its clinical purpose and consequences: it requires gathering scattered data, prioritizing treatments, planning, and sometimes arbitrating between therapeutic intentions. Interprofessional collaboration is then served by new tools and informed by experience-sharing: they alone can meet the clinical and societal challenge of deprescribing, while dedicated algorithms and AI are coming.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues