Nest-site or landscape features, that is the question: Varying influence of anthropogenic and predation effects on nest survival of a threatened Amazon parrot

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Miguel Ángel De Labra-Hernández , Katherine Renton
{"title":"Nest-site or landscape features, that is the question: Varying influence of anthropogenic and predation effects on nest survival of a threatened Amazon parrot","authors":"Miguel Ángel De Labra-Hernández ,&nbsp;Katherine Renton","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic activities are the major drivers of biodiversity loss, and human pressure of capture for trade is closely associated with decreasing population trends of Psittaciformes. We evaluated reproductive output and daily survival rate of 45 nests of the threatened Northern Mealy Amazon (<em>Amazona guatemalae</em>) in tropical moist forest of southern Mexico to determine the influence of anthropogenic and natural factors on nest survival. We applied GLMM to determine which variables, at three scales of: nest-site; habitat; and landscape level, influenced daily survival of nests when failure was due to anthropogenic factors or animal predation. Northern Mealy Amazons had a high 74 % loss of initial reproductive investment of 2.6 ± 0.6 eggs/female, resulting in a low reproductive output of 0.6 ± 1.1 nestlings &gt;50 days old/female, mainly due to human poaching of nests. GLMM determined that human impacts on nest survival were influenced by the landscape feature of distance from the nearest village, with nests located &gt;2.3 km from a human settlement having greater probability of survival. However, the risk of animal predation of nests was influenced by nest-site features, with higher, smaller, and deeper nest-cavities having increased daily survival. Our results suggest that while parrots may have evolved nest-site selection criteria to reduce the risks of animal predation, these may have less influence over survival when faced with anthropogenic threats. The increasing human pressures on wild populations require landscape level and socially-focused conservation strategies for threatened species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"306 ","pages":"Article 111123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725001600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities are the major drivers of biodiversity loss, and human pressure of capture for trade is closely associated with decreasing population trends of Psittaciformes. We evaluated reproductive output and daily survival rate of 45 nests of the threatened Northern Mealy Amazon (Amazona guatemalae) in tropical moist forest of southern Mexico to determine the influence of anthropogenic and natural factors on nest survival. We applied GLMM to determine which variables, at three scales of: nest-site; habitat; and landscape level, influenced daily survival of nests when failure was due to anthropogenic factors or animal predation. Northern Mealy Amazons had a high 74 % loss of initial reproductive investment of 2.6 ± 0.6 eggs/female, resulting in a low reproductive output of 0.6 ± 1.1 nestlings >50 days old/female, mainly due to human poaching of nests. GLMM determined that human impacts on nest survival were influenced by the landscape feature of distance from the nearest village, with nests located >2.3 km from a human settlement having greater probability of survival. However, the risk of animal predation of nests was influenced by nest-site features, with higher, smaller, and deeper nest-cavities having increased daily survival. Our results suggest that while parrots may have evolved nest-site selection criteria to reduce the risks of animal predation, these may have less influence over survival when faced with anthropogenic threats. The increasing human pressures on wild populations require landscape level and socially-focused conservation strategies for threatened species.
筑巢地点或景观特征,这是一个问题:人类活动和捕食对受威胁的亚马逊鹦鹉筑巢生存的不同影响
人为活动是生物多样性丧失的主要驱动因素,人为的贸易捕捞压力与鹦鹉形目动物数量减少的趋势密切相关。本研究对墨西哥南部热带湿润森林中45个受威胁的北粉亚马孙(危地马拉亚马孙)蚁巢的繁殖量和日存活率进行了评估,以确定人为因素和自然因素对蚁巢存活的影响。我们应用GLMM来确定哪些变量,在三个尺度上:巢址;栖息地;当人为因素或动物捕食导致巢巢失败时,景观水平会影响巢巢的日常存活。北方粉粉亚马逊河鼠的初始生殖投资损失高达74%,为2.6±0.6个蛋/只,导致繁殖产出低,为0.6±1.1个>;50天龄/只,主要原因是人类偷猎巢穴。GLMM确定,人类对巢穴生存的影响受到距离最近村庄距离的景观特征的影响,距离人类住区2.3公里的巢穴生存的可能性更大。然而,动物捕食巢穴的风险受到巢位特征的影响,更高、更小和更深的巢腔增加了每日存活率。我们的研究结果表明,虽然鹦鹉可能已经进化出了选择巢穴的标准,以减少动物捕食的风险,但当面临人为威胁时,这些标准对生存的影响可能较小。人类对野生种群日益增加的压力要求对濒危物种采取景观层面和以社会为重点的保护策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信