Is sensitivity to injustice a precursor to anxiety? The moderating role of stress: Evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Xinyi Zhu , Jian Fang , Yiming Yu , Morris Hoffman , Eyal Aharoni , Qun Yang
{"title":"Is sensitivity to injustice a precursor to anxiety? The moderating role of stress: Evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies","authors":"Xinyi Zhu ,&nbsp;Jian Fang ,&nbsp;Yiming Yu ,&nbsp;Morris Hoffman ,&nbsp;Eyal Aharoni ,&nbsp;Qun Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Justice sensitivity (JS) plays a key role in prosocial behavior but is also linked to anxiety, especially under stress. This study examines how JS predicts generalized anxiety (GA) under different levels of perceived stress (PS). In Study 1, a cross-sectional survey of 621 college students assessed the relationship between JS, GA, and the moderating role of PS. In Study 2, a longitudinal natural experiment with 164 students explored how JS influenced GA at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of the semester under stressful conditions. Both victim justice sensitivity (VJS) and altruistic justice sensitivity (AJS) predicted GA through negative affect (NA). Higher levels of PS intensified the relationship between VJS and GA by increasing NA. Students with high VJS experienced greater NA during stressful events, such as final exams, while those with low VJS showed minimal changes in NA. The findings indicate that JS, particularly VJS, can contribute to emotional problems under high-stress conditions, suggesting the importance of addressing JS in interventions aimed at improving emotional health for students with high JS. These results offer new perspectives on understanding anxiety and stress in relation to JS and inform potential strategies for supporting mental well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 113190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Justice sensitivity (JS) plays a key role in prosocial behavior but is also linked to anxiety, especially under stress. This study examines how JS predicts generalized anxiety (GA) under different levels of perceived stress (PS). In Study 1, a cross-sectional survey of 621 college students assessed the relationship between JS, GA, and the moderating role of PS. In Study 2, a longitudinal natural experiment with 164 students explored how JS influenced GA at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of the semester under stressful conditions. Both victim justice sensitivity (VJS) and altruistic justice sensitivity (AJS) predicted GA through negative affect (NA). Higher levels of PS intensified the relationship between VJS and GA by increasing NA. Students with high VJS experienced greater NA during stressful events, such as final exams, while those with low VJS showed minimal changes in NA. The findings indicate that JS, particularly VJS, can contribute to emotional problems under high-stress conditions, suggesting the importance of addressing JS in interventions aimed at improving emotional health for students with high JS. These results offer new perspectives on understanding anxiety and stress in relation to JS and inform potential strategies for supporting mental well-being.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信