Uncertainty propagation from sensor data to deep learning models in autonomous driving

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yifan Wang , Tiexin Wang , Tao Yue
{"title":"Uncertainty propagation from sensor data to deep learning models in autonomous driving","authors":"Yifan Wang ,&nbsp;Tiexin Wang ,&nbsp;Tao Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>Deep learning has been widely used in Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS). Though significant progress has been made regarding their efficiency and accuracy, uncertainty remains a critical factor affecting ADS safety. Such uncertainties are often due to environmental noise and/or imperfect algorithm structures. Studies on uncertainty quantification mostly focus on single classification tasks and overlook how uncertainties propagate from the perception to downstream decision-making, studying of which is critical, as the interplay between perception and decision-making can significantly impact the overall safety of ADS.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives:</h3><div>We quantify and understand the uncertainty propagation from sensor data to deep learning models, as well as its impact on ADS safety.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We present an empirical study that quantifies both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties and assesses how such uncertainties propagate and impact ADS safety under various sensor noise conditions. We also investigate the suitability of two epistemic uncertainty quantification methods (i.e., MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles) to ADS tasks and their cost-effectiveness in selecting highly-uncertain samples.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Results show that increased noise can significantly increase uncertainty and degrade model performance, thereby compromising decision-making and potentially impacting ADS safety. Both MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles effectively measure the model’s epistemic uncertainty, with MC Dropout showing higher correlation with ADS safety, and saving time and computational costs. Moreover, there are significant differences in the highly-uncertain samples they identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Our results show the importance of considering uncertainty propagation to ensure the ADS safety. Compared to Deep Ensembles, MC Dropout’s efficiency makes it a more suitable choice in the context of ADS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925000746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:

Deep learning has been widely used in Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS). Though significant progress has been made regarding their efficiency and accuracy, uncertainty remains a critical factor affecting ADS safety. Such uncertainties are often due to environmental noise and/or imperfect algorithm structures. Studies on uncertainty quantification mostly focus on single classification tasks and overlook how uncertainties propagate from the perception to downstream decision-making, studying of which is critical, as the interplay between perception and decision-making can significantly impact the overall safety of ADS.

Objectives:

We quantify and understand the uncertainty propagation from sensor data to deep learning models, as well as its impact on ADS safety.

Methods:

We present an empirical study that quantifies both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties and assesses how such uncertainties propagate and impact ADS safety under various sensor noise conditions. We also investigate the suitability of two epistemic uncertainty quantification methods (i.e., MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles) to ADS tasks and their cost-effectiveness in selecting highly-uncertain samples.

Results:

Results show that increased noise can significantly increase uncertainty and degrade model performance, thereby compromising decision-making and potentially impacting ADS safety. Both MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles effectively measure the model’s epistemic uncertainty, with MC Dropout showing higher correlation with ADS safety, and saving time and computational costs. Moreover, there are significant differences in the highly-uncertain samples they identified.

Conclusion:

Our results show the importance of considering uncertainty propagation to ensure the ADS safety. Compared to Deep Ensembles, MC Dropout’s efficiency makes it a more suitable choice in the context of ADS.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信