{"title":"People who are more likely to die care less about the future: Life insurance risk ratings predict personality","authors":"Aaron W. Lukaszewski , Joseph H. Manson","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptationist models predict that individuals at higher risk of death will be calibrated to prioritize immediate over future benefits. However, operationalizing individual mortality risk in empirical studies has proven challenging. We introduce and explore a novel method of operationalizing individual mortality risk: Using the risk ratings assigned by actuaries to purchasers of individual life insurance policies. Participants, who had recently gone through underwriting as part of the insurance application process, completed self-report instruments to assess personality traits related to present-future tradeoffs and a putative fast-slow continuum of life history strategy. Study 1 (<em>n</em> = 270) found that insurance-based mortality risk associated negatively with a measure of slow life strategy and positively with a measure of short-term mating orientation. Study 2 (<em>n</em> = 402), which was preregistered, found that insurance-based mortality risk associated positively with impulsivity and negatively with conscientiousness and consideration of future consequences. Self-estimated mortality risk did not track insurance-based mortality risk, but was independently correlated with the same personality traits. We discuss the potential of insurance-based mortality risk estimates in behavioral research and the significance of these findings for adaptationist models of individual differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"46 3","pages":"Article 106683"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825000327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adaptationist models predict that individuals at higher risk of death will be calibrated to prioritize immediate over future benefits. However, operationalizing individual mortality risk in empirical studies has proven challenging. We introduce and explore a novel method of operationalizing individual mortality risk: Using the risk ratings assigned by actuaries to purchasers of individual life insurance policies. Participants, who had recently gone through underwriting as part of the insurance application process, completed self-report instruments to assess personality traits related to present-future tradeoffs and a putative fast-slow continuum of life history strategy. Study 1 (n = 270) found that insurance-based mortality risk associated negatively with a measure of slow life strategy and positively with a measure of short-term mating orientation. Study 2 (n = 402), which was preregistered, found that insurance-based mortality risk associated positively with impulsivity and negatively with conscientiousness and consideration of future consequences. Self-estimated mortality risk did not track insurance-based mortality risk, but was independently correlated with the same personality traits. We discuss the potential of insurance-based mortality risk estimates in behavioral research and the significance of these findings for adaptationist models of individual differences.
期刊介绍:
Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.