Contact X-ray brachytherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109976
Simon G. Powell , James N.R. Wyatt , Christopher Rao , Amandeep Dhadda , Muneeb Ul Haq , Ngu Wah Than , Ahsan Javed , Shakil Ahmed , D.M. Pritchard , Jamie Mills , Alexandra Stewart , Timothy S. Maughan , Jean-Piere Gerard , Arthur Sun Myint
{"title":"Contact X-ray brachytherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Simon G. Powell ,&nbsp;James N.R. Wyatt ,&nbsp;Christopher Rao ,&nbsp;Amandeep Dhadda ,&nbsp;Muneeb Ul Haq ,&nbsp;Ngu Wah Than ,&nbsp;Ahsan Javed ,&nbsp;Shakil Ahmed ,&nbsp;D.M. Pritchard ,&nbsp;Jamie Mills ,&nbsp;Alexandra Stewart ,&nbsp;Timothy S. Maughan ,&nbsp;Jean-Piere Gerard ,&nbsp;Arthur Sun Myint","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rectal cancer is a highly prevalent disease. Evidence presented in the 2025 phase-III OPERA randomised trial suggests that Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB), with external beam chemoradiotherapy, is a viable organ-preserving alternative to radical surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical effectiveness of CXB in the treatment of rectal cancer.</div><div>This systematic review was prospectively registered (CRD42021284969) and reported following PRISMA guidelines. Multiple electronic databases were interrogated using the search terms “Rectal cancer”, “Contact Brachytherapy”, and synonym terms. Clinical complete response (cCR) was the primary outcome. Proportional meta-analyses were conducted and presented as forest plots with summary proportions and 95 % confidence intervals.</div><div>The literature search identified 973 studies, of which 52 studies encompassing 5447 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of outcomes were as follows: cCR rate = 82 % (95 % CI 76–88 %), Local Regrowth rate = 20 % (95 % CI 15–25 %), regional metastasis rate = 3 % (95 % CI 2–4 %), salvage surgery rate = 14 % (95 % CI 11–18 %), long-term disease control post-salvage surgery rate = 88 % (95 % CI 78–96 %) and organ preservation = 81 % (95 % CI 74–88 %).</div><div>CXB in the appropriately selected patient population can achieve long-term disease control and organ preservation whilst avoiding major surgery. Salvage surgery remains a viable option for patients who experience disease regrowth with excellent long-term disease control. Clinicians should discuss CXB with rectal cancer patients, presenting it as a viable and safe alternative to radical surgery. This is particularly pertinent for patients who are stoma-averse or older patients in frail health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 7","pages":"Article 109976"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325004044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rectal cancer is a highly prevalent disease. Evidence presented in the 2025 phase-III OPERA randomised trial suggests that Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB), with external beam chemoradiotherapy, is a viable organ-preserving alternative to radical surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical effectiveness of CXB in the treatment of rectal cancer.
This systematic review was prospectively registered (CRD42021284969) and reported following PRISMA guidelines. Multiple electronic databases were interrogated using the search terms “Rectal cancer”, “Contact Brachytherapy”, and synonym terms. Clinical complete response (cCR) was the primary outcome. Proportional meta-analyses were conducted and presented as forest plots with summary proportions and 95 % confidence intervals.
The literature search identified 973 studies, of which 52 studies encompassing 5447 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of outcomes were as follows: cCR rate = 82 % (95 % CI 76–88 %), Local Regrowth rate = 20 % (95 % CI 15–25 %), regional metastasis rate = 3 % (95 % CI 2–4 %), salvage surgery rate = 14 % (95 % CI 11–18 %), long-term disease control post-salvage surgery rate = 88 % (95 % CI 78–96 %) and organ preservation = 81 % (95 % CI 74–88 %).
CXB in the appropriately selected patient population can achieve long-term disease control and organ preservation whilst avoiding major surgery. Salvage surgery remains a viable option for patients who experience disease regrowth with excellent long-term disease control. Clinicians should discuss CXB with rectal cancer patients, presenting it as a viable and safe alternative to radical surgery. This is particularly pertinent for patients who are stoma-averse or older patients in frail health.
接触x射线近距离治疗直肠癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析
直肠癌是一种非常普遍的疾病。2025年iii期OPERA随机试验提供的证据表明,接触x射线近距离放射治疗(CXB)与外部放化疗是一种可行的器官保存替代根治性手术。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估CXB治疗直肠癌的临床疗效。该系统评价已前瞻性注册(CRD42021284969),并按照PRISMA指南进行报告。使用搜索词“直肠癌”、“接触近距离放射治疗”和同义词查询多个电子数据库。临床完全缓解(cCR)是主要终点。进行了比例荟萃分析,并以汇总比例和95%置信区间的森林图呈现。文献检索确定了973项研究,其中52项研究包括5447例患者符合纳入和排除标准,并被纳入meta分析。结果汇总估计如下:cCR率= 82% (95% CI 76 - 88%),局部再生率= 20% (95% CI 15 - 25%),区域转移率= 3% (95% CI 2-4 %),挽救性手术率= 14% (95% CI 11 - 18%),挽救性手术后长期疾病控制率= 88% (95% CI 78 - 96%),器官保存率= 81% (95% CI 74 - 88%)。在适当选择的患者群体中使用CXB可以实现长期的疾病控制和器官保存,同时避免大手术。救助手术仍然是一个可行的选择,患者经历疾病再生和良好的长期疾病控制。临床医生应与直肠癌患者讨论CXB,将其作为根治性手术的可行且安全的替代方案。这对不喜欢造口手术的患者或体弱多病的老年患者尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信