{"title":"Sustainable no–tillage practices with a disc type novel residue cleaning mechanism: Design, development and field evaluation","authors":"Manish Kumar , Kamendra , H.S. Pandey , K.P. Singh , Chetna Verma , Satish Kumar Singh , Dushyant Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crop residue management in no–tillage under conservation agriculture is crucial for maintaining soil health and optimizing crop yields. This study presents a residue cleaning mechanism specially designed for no–tillage sowing to overcome challenges posed by crop residues left by combine harvesters. This research involved design, development and field–evaluation of a residue cleaning unit attached to a seed–cum–fertilizer drill equipped with a broad–spacing toolbar. The initial trials optimized operational parameters in a test soil bin, showing maximum residue removal efficiency at 45° disc angle and 20° tilt angle. Following these trials, a tractor drawn six units of residue cleaning discs, each with 12 teeth and a diameter of 350 mm were fabricated along with an inverted T–type furrow opener. The developed prototype of six-row seed–cum–fertilizer drill with a residue cleaning mechanism (T1) was evaluated for the wheat–green gram–maize cropping system and compared with the ten–row Happy Seeder (T2). The results showed that the improvement in grain yield for green gram (6.05 %) was significantly higher for T1 compared to T2. However, the improvements in grain yield for wheat (4.43 %) and maize (0.86 %) was not statistically significant (p < 0.05), resulting in higher net incomes for T1. For each cropping system, the energy analysis showed that, T1 (27.47 MJ/kg) required slightly less specific energy than T2 (28.34 MJ/kg). However, T1 had slightly higher total carbon emissions (10970.89 kg CO2eq/ha) compared to T2 (10638.17 kg CO2eq/ha). The benefit–cost ratio was lower for T1 (2.08) compared to T2 (2.16), but increasing the number of rows in the T1 treatment could enhance field capacity, potentially reducing carbon emissions and improving economic returns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106560"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872500114X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Crop residue management in no–tillage under conservation agriculture is crucial for maintaining soil health and optimizing crop yields. This study presents a residue cleaning mechanism specially designed for no–tillage sowing to overcome challenges posed by crop residues left by combine harvesters. This research involved design, development and field–evaluation of a residue cleaning unit attached to a seed–cum–fertilizer drill equipped with a broad–spacing toolbar. The initial trials optimized operational parameters in a test soil bin, showing maximum residue removal efficiency at 45° disc angle and 20° tilt angle. Following these trials, a tractor drawn six units of residue cleaning discs, each with 12 teeth and a diameter of 350 mm were fabricated along with an inverted T–type furrow opener. The developed prototype of six-row seed–cum–fertilizer drill with a residue cleaning mechanism (T1) was evaluated for the wheat–green gram–maize cropping system and compared with the ten–row Happy Seeder (T2). The results showed that the improvement in grain yield for green gram (6.05 %) was significantly higher for T1 compared to T2. However, the improvements in grain yield for wheat (4.43 %) and maize (0.86 %) was not statistically significant (p < 0.05), resulting in higher net incomes for T1. For each cropping system, the energy analysis showed that, T1 (27.47 MJ/kg) required slightly less specific energy than T2 (28.34 MJ/kg). However, T1 had slightly higher total carbon emissions (10970.89 kg CO2eq/ha) compared to T2 (10638.17 kg CO2eq/ha). The benefit–cost ratio was lower for T1 (2.08) compared to T2 (2.16), but increasing the number of rows in the T1 treatment could enhance field capacity, potentially reducing carbon emissions and improving economic returns.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.