Sustainable no–tillage practices with a disc type novel residue cleaning mechanism: Design, development and field evaluation

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Manish Kumar , Kamendra , H.S. Pandey , K.P. Singh , Chetna Verma , Satish Kumar Singh , Dushyant Singh
{"title":"Sustainable no–tillage practices with a disc type novel residue cleaning mechanism: Design, development and field evaluation","authors":"Manish Kumar ,&nbsp;Kamendra ,&nbsp;H.S. Pandey ,&nbsp;K.P. Singh ,&nbsp;Chetna Verma ,&nbsp;Satish Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Dushyant Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crop residue management in no–tillage under conservation agriculture is crucial for maintaining soil health and optimizing crop yields. This study presents a residue cleaning mechanism specially designed for no–tillage sowing to overcome challenges posed by crop residues left by combine harvesters. This research involved design, development and field–evaluation of a residue cleaning unit attached to a seed–cum–fertilizer drill equipped with a broad–spacing toolbar. The initial trials optimized operational parameters in a test soil bin, showing maximum residue removal efficiency at 45° disc angle and 20° tilt angle. Following these trials, a tractor drawn six units of residue cleaning discs, each with 12 teeth and a diameter of 350 mm were fabricated along with an inverted T–type furrow opener. The developed prototype of six-row seed–cum–fertilizer drill with a residue cleaning mechanism (T1) was evaluated for the wheat–green gram–maize cropping system and compared with the ten–row Happy Seeder (T2). The results showed that the improvement in grain yield for green gram (6.05 %) was significantly higher for T1 compared to T2. However, the improvements in grain yield for wheat (4.43 %) and maize (0.86 %) was not statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05), resulting in higher net incomes for T1. For each cropping system, the energy analysis showed that, T1 (27.47 MJ/kg) required slightly less specific energy than T2 (28.34 MJ/kg). However, T1 had slightly higher total carbon emissions (10970.89 kg CO2eq/ha) compared to T2 (10638.17 kg CO2eq/ha). The benefit–cost ratio was lower for T1 (2.08) compared to T2 (2.16), but increasing the number of rows in the T1 treatment could enhance field capacity, potentially reducing carbon emissions and improving economic returns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106560"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872500114X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crop residue management in no–tillage under conservation agriculture is crucial for maintaining soil health and optimizing crop yields. This study presents a residue cleaning mechanism specially designed for no–tillage sowing to overcome challenges posed by crop residues left by combine harvesters. This research involved design, development and field–evaluation of a residue cleaning unit attached to a seed–cum–fertilizer drill equipped with a broad–spacing toolbar. The initial trials optimized operational parameters in a test soil bin, showing maximum residue removal efficiency at 45° disc angle and 20° tilt angle. Following these trials, a tractor drawn six units of residue cleaning discs, each with 12 teeth and a diameter of 350 mm were fabricated along with an inverted T–type furrow opener. The developed prototype of six-row seed–cum–fertilizer drill with a residue cleaning mechanism (T1) was evaluated for the wheat–green gram–maize cropping system and compared with the ten–row Happy Seeder (T2). The results showed that the improvement in grain yield for green gram (6.05 %) was significantly higher for T1 compared to T2. However, the improvements in grain yield for wheat (4.43 %) and maize (0.86 %) was not statistically significant (p < 0.05), resulting in higher net incomes for T1. For each cropping system, the energy analysis showed that, T1 (27.47 MJ/kg) required slightly less specific energy than T2 (28.34 MJ/kg). However, T1 had slightly higher total carbon emissions (10970.89 kg CO2eq/ha) compared to T2 (10638.17 kg CO2eq/ha). The benefit–cost ratio was lower for T1 (2.08) compared to T2 (2.16), but increasing the number of rows in the T1 treatment could enhance field capacity, potentially reducing carbon emissions and improving economic returns.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信