Performative gesture or genuinely supportive? Workplace responses to the 2020 racial injustice movement

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Lauren Collier-Spruel , Ann Marie Ryan , Sarah Kuang
{"title":"Performative gesture or genuinely supportive? Workplace responses to the 2020 racial injustice movement","authors":"Lauren Collier-Spruel ,&nbsp;Ann Marie Ryan ,&nbsp;Sarah Kuang","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the wake of racial injustice protests, corporations communicated their commitment to diversity and inclusion. The present paper describes textual analyses of organizational anti-racism statements released in the period following the murder of George Floyd and a survey of employee perceptions of communication. The review of statements indicated that strategic ambiguity was employed in describing events, harms, diversity, and planned actions, and organizations seldom addressed their internal initiatives, rarely mentioned internal accountability practices for ensuring racial justice, and many did not specifically mention their Black employees. In the survey study, Black employees felt more negatively about an absence of communication than non-Black employees and held more positive work attitudes in organizations with more credible communication. Implications for research on the credibility of corporate social advocacy efforts as well as practical suggestions for communication around these efforts are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 102561"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of racial injustice protests, corporations communicated their commitment to diversity and inclusion. The present paper describes textual analyses of organizational anti-racism statements released in the period following the murder of George Floyd and a survey of employee perceptions of communication. The review of statements indicated that strategic ambiguity was employed in describing events, harms, diversity, and planned actions, and organizations seldom addressed their internal initiatives, rarely mentioned internal accountability practices for ensuring racial justice, and many did not specifically mention their Black employees. In the survey study, Black employees felt more negatively about an absence of communication than non-Black employees and held more positive work attitudes in organizations with more credible communication. Implications for research on the credibility of corporate social advocacy efforts as well as practical suggestions for communication around these efforts are discussed.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信