The association between subjective and objective sleep parameters and internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescents

Roan van der Laars , Diandra C. Bouter , M. Elisabeth Koopman-Verhoeff , Milan Zarchev , Sibel Ercan , Witte J.G. Hoogendijk , Nina H. Grootendorst-van Mil
{"title":"The association between subjective and objective sleep parameters and internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescents","authors":"Roan van der Laars ,&nbsp;Diandra C. Bouter ,&nbsp;M. Elisabeth Koopman-Verhoeff ,&nbsp;Milan Zarchev ,&nbsp;Sibel Ercan ,&nbsp;Witte J.G. Hoogendijk ,&nbsp;Nina H. Grootendorst-van Mil","doi":"10.1016/j.sleepe.2025.100107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sleep practices change markedly in adolescence, leading to reductions in both duration and quality. Poor sleep health is a core component of many psychiatric disorders, yet most previous studies have mainly used singular rather than multidimensional sleep measures, which fail to account for all aspects of sleep as a behavior. In an adolescent cohort oversampled for high psychopathology risk (<em>n</em> = 494, mean age 17.88), we used a validated 0–6 composite sleep health score based on sleep diary and actigraphy data. The Youth Self Report (YSR) quantified psychopathology symptoms as a total score, as broadband problem scales (e.g., externalizing problems), and narrowband scales (e.g., aggressive problems). Confounder-adjusted multiple linear regression models examined the association between the sleep composite score and total, broadband, and narrowband problem scores. A higher sleep composite score, indicating better sleep health, was linked to a lower total problems score (B -3.66, 95 % CI [-5.20; -2.12]) and was inversely related to all specific problem scales, including internalizing and externalizing problems, with the sole exception of aggressive problems. Secondary analyses revealed consistent associations between subjective sleep domains and various problem subscales, whereas objective domains showed none. Our study underscores the complementary roles of subjective and objective sleep measures in mental health research, illustrating that subjective measures are consistently associated with psychopathological symptoms and may offer personal relevance, while objective measures might provide accuracy and consistency by capturing detailed sleep patterns. However, limitations include the study's cross-sectional design and potential selection bias in the sleep measurement group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74809,"journal":{"name":"Sleep epidemiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667343625000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleep practices change markedly in adolescence, leading to reductions in both duration and quality. Poor sleep health is a core component of many psychiatric disorders, yet most previous studies have mainly used singular rather than multidimensional sleep measures, which fail to account for all aspects of sleep as a behavior. In an adolescent cohort oversampled for high psychopathology risk (n = 494, mean age 17.88), we used a validated 0–6 composite sleep health score based on sleep diary and actigraphy data. The Youth Self Report (YSR) quantified psychopathology symptoms as a total score, as broadband problem scales (e.g., externalizing problems), and narrowband scales (e.g., aggressive problems). Confounder-adjusted multiple linear regression models examined the association between the sleep composite score and total, broadband, and narrowband problem scores. A higher sleep composite score, indicating better sleep health, was linked to a lower total problems score (B -3.66, 95 % CI [-5.20; -2.12]) and was inversely related to all specific problem scales, including internalizing and externalizing problems, with the sole exception of aggressive problems. Secondary analyses revealed consistent associations between subjective sleep domains and various problem subscales, whereas objective domains showed none. Our study underscores the complementary roles of subjective and objective sleep measures in mental health research, illustrating that subjective measures are consistently associated with psychopathological symptoms and may offer personal relevance, while objective measures might provide accuracy and consistency by capturing detailed sleep patterns. However, limitations include the study's cross-sectional design and potential selection bias in the sleep measurement group.
青少年主观和客观睡眠参数与内化和外化问题的关系
在青春期,睡眠习惯会发生显著变化,导致睡眠时间和质量的减少。睡眠健康状况不佳是许多精神疾病的核心组成部分,然而,大多数先前的研究主要使用单一而非多维的睡眠测量方法,这无法将睡眠作为一种行为的所有方面都考虑在内。在高精神病理风险的青少年队列中(n = 494,平均年龄17.88),我们使用基于睡眠日记和活动记录数据的有效的0-6复合睡眠健康评分。青年自我报告(YSR)将精神病理症状量化为总分,包括宽频问题量表(如外化问题)和窄频问题量表(如攻击性问题)。经混杂因素调整的多元线性回归模型检验了睡眠综合得分与总、宽带和窄带问题得分之间的关系。睡眠综合得分越高,表明睡眠健康状况越好,与总问题得分越低有关(B -3.66, 95% CI [-5.20;-2.12]),并且与所有特定问题量表呈负相关,包括内化和外化问题,唯一的例外是攻击性问题。二次分析显示,主观睡眠领域和各种问题子量表之间存在一致的关联,而客观领域则没有。我们的研究强调了主观和客观睡眠测量在心理健康研究中的互补作用,说明主观测量始终与精神病理症状相关,可能提供个人相关性,而客观测量可能通过捕获详细的睡眠模式提供准确性和一致性。然而,局限性包括研究的横截面设计和睡眠测量组的潜在选择偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep epidemiology
Sleep epidemiology Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Clinical Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信