{"title":"Shared autonomy between human electroencephalography and TD3 deep reinforcement learning: A multi-agent copilot approach","authors":"Chun-Ren Phang, Akimasa Hirata","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms enable the development of fully autonomous agents that can interact with the environment. Brain–computer interface (BCI) systems decipher human implicit brain signals regardless of the explicit environment. We proposed a novel integration technique between deep RL and BCI to improve beneficial human interventions in autonomous systems and the performance in decoding brain activities by considering environmental factors. Shared autonomy was allowed between the action command decoded from the electroencephalography (EEG) of the human agent and the action generated from the twin delayed DDPG (TD3) agent for a given complex environment. Our proposed copilot control scheme with a full blocker (Co-FB) significantly outperformed the individual EEG (EEG-NB) or TD3 control. The Co-FB model achieved a higher target-approaching score, lower failure rate, and lower human workload than the EEG-NB model. We also proposed a disparity <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <annotation>$d$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-index to evaluate the effect of contradicting agent decisions on the control accuracy and authority of the copilot model. We observed that shifting control authority to the TD3 agent improved performance when BCI decoding was not optimal. These findings indicate that the copilot system can effectively handle complex environments and that BCI performance can be improved by considering environmental factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1546 1","pages":"157-172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms enable the development of fully autonomous agents that can interact with the environment. Brain–computer interface (BCI) systems decipher human implicit brain signals regardless of the explicit environment. We proposed a novel integration technique between deep RL and BCI to improve beneficial human interventions in autonomous systems and the performance in decoding brain activities by considering environmental factors. Shared autonomy was allowed between the action command decoded from the electroencephalography (EEG) of the human agent and the action generated from the twin delayed DDPG (TD3) agent for a given complex environment. Our proposed copilot control scheme with a full blocker (Co-FB) significantly outperformed the individual EEG (EEG-NB) or TD3 control. The Co-FB model achieved a higher target-approaching score, lower failure rate, and lower human workload than the EEG-NB model. We also proposed a disparity -index to evaluate the effect of contradicting agent decisions on the control accuracy and authority of the copilot model. We observed that shifting control authority to the TD3 agent improved performance when BCI decoding was not optimal. These findings indicate that the copilot system can effectively handle complex environments and that BCI performance can be improved by considering environmental factors.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.