Does urbanization inevitably exacerbate cropland pressure? The multiscale evidence from China

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yanfei Xiong, Mengba Liu, Lanjiao Wen, Anlu Zhang
{"title":"Does urbanization inevitably exacerbate cropland pressure? The multiscale evidence from China","authors":"Yanfei Xiong, Mengba Liu, Lanjiao Wen, Anlu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the relationship between urbanization and cropland pressure is important for achieving the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The impact of urbanization on cropland pressure lacks a comprehensive analysis within a cropland supply-demand framework, particularly when considering ecological security from multiscale perspectives. In this study, we calculate cropland quantity pressure (CQP) and cropland ecological pressure (CEP) by employing a modified cropland pressure index and ecological footprint model on the basis of cropland’s ecosystem service value. Then, based on the metacoupling theory, the spatial self-lagging model (SLX) is applied to test the local and remote impacts of urbanization on cropland pressure. The results show that from 2009 to 2022, China's CQP increased by 6.87%, while CEP decreased by 7.89%, both remaining at moderate levels. Excessive ecological pressure was observed in major grain-producing areas, with CEP 20.61% above the national average. Urbanization exhibits trade-off effects on CQP and CEP; spatial urbanization intensifies both pressures, whereas population and social urbanization mitigate them. Remote urbanization impacts cropland pressure consistently across provincial and city scales, while local effects vary due to uneven regional urbanization development. Major grain producing areas are particularly vulnerable to urbanization’s adverse effects, whether local or remote. Overall, China's cropland pressure remains severe, with a trade-off between CQP and CEP, and urbanization is not a single pressure source. This study carefully examines the relationship between urbanization and cropland pressure and provides new insights for sustainable use of cropland worldwide.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between urbanization and cropland pressure is important for achieving the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The impact of urbanization on cropland pressure lacks a comprehensive analysis within a cropland supply-demand framework, particularly when considering ecological security from multiscale perspectives. In this study, we calculate cropland quantity pressure (CQP) and cropland ecological pressure (CEP) by employing a modified cropland pressure index and ecological footprint model on the basis of cropland’s ecosystem service value. Then, based on the metacoupling theory, the spatial self-lagging model (SLX) is applied to test the local and remote impacts of urbanization on cropland pressure. The results show that from 2009 to 2022, China's CQP increased by 6.87%, while CEP decreased by 7.89%, both remaining at moderate levels. Excessive ecological pressure was observed in major grain-producing areas, with CEP 20.61% above the national average. Urbanization exhibits trade-off effects on CQP and CEP; spatial urbanization intensifies both pressures, whereas population and social urbanization mitigate them. Remote urbanization impacts cropland pressure consistently across provincial and city scales, while local effects vary due to uneven regional urbanization development. Major grain producing areas are particularly vulnerable to urbanization’s adverse effects, whether local or remote. Overall, China's cropland pressure remains severe, with a trade-off between CQP and CEP, and urbanization is not a single pressure source. This study carefully examines the relationship between urbanization and cropland pressure and provides new insights for sustainable use of cropland worldwide.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信