Diagnostic performance of deep learning-assisted [18F]FDG PET imaging for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yuan Sun, Yuhan Chen, La Dong, Daoyan Hu, Xiaohui Zhang, Chentao Jin, Rui Zhou, Jucheng Zhang, Xiaofeng Dou, Jing Wang, Le Xue, Meiling Xiao, Yan Zhong, Mei Tian, Hong Zhang
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of deep learning-assisted [18F]FDG PET imaging for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yuan Sun, Yuhan Chen, La Dong, Daoyan Hu, Xiaohui Zhang, Chentao Jin, Rui Zhou, Jucheng Zhang, Xiaofeng Dou, Jing Wang, Le Xue, Meiling Xiao, Yan Zhong, Mei Tian, Hong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07228-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to calculate the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL)-assisted <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched for related studies from inception to May 24, 2024. We included original studies that developed a DL algorithm for [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET imaging to assess diagnostic performance in classifying AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal control (NC). A bivariate random-effects model was employed to assess the area under the curve (AUC).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We identified 36 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 studies distinguished AD from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99). Thirteen studies distinguished AD from MCI, with a pooled AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). Nineteen studies distinguished MCI from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). Additionally, we found large amounts of heterogeneity across studies which could be partially attributed to variations in DL methods and imaging modalities.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that DL-assisted [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET imaging has high diagnostic performance in identifying AD. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the necessity for future research to incorporate external validation, utilize large sample size, and adhere to rigorous guideline to provide robust support for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07228-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to calculate the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL)-assisted 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Methods

The Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched for related studies from inception to May 24, 2024. We included original studies that developed a DL algorithm for [18F]FDG PET imaging to assess diagnostic performance in classifying AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal control (NC). A bivariate random-effects model was employed to assess the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

We identified 36 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 studies distinguished AD from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99). Thirteen studies distinguished AD from MCI, with a pooled AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). Nineteen studies distinguished MCI from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). Additionally, we found large amounts of heterogeneity across studies which could be partially attributed to variations in DL methods and imaging modalities.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that DL-assisted [18F]FDG PET imaging has high diagnostic performance in identifying AD. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the necessity for future research to incorporate external validation, utilize large sample size, and adhere to rigorous guideline to provide robust support for clinical decision-making.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信