Yuan Sun, Yuhan Chen, La Dong, Daoyan Hu, Xiaohui Zhang, Chentao Jin, Rui Zhou, Jucheng Zhang, Xiaofeng Dou, Jing Wang, Le Xue, Meiling Xiao, Yan Zhong, Mei Tian, Hong Zhang
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of deep learning-assisted [18F]FDG PET imaging for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yuan Sun, Yuhan Chen, La Dong, Daoyan Hu, Xiaohui Zhang, Chentao Jin, Rui Zhou, Jucheng Zhang, Xiaofeng Dou, Jing Wang, Le Xue, Meiling Xiao, Yan Zhong, Mei Tian, Hong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07228-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to calculate the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL)-assisted <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched for related studies from inception to May 24, 2024. We included original studies that developed a DL algorithm for [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET imaging to assess diagnostic performance in classifying AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal control (NC). A bivariate random-effects model was employed to assess the area under the curve (AUC).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We identified 36 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 studies distinguished AD from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99). Thirteen studies distinguished AD from MCI, with a pooled AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). Nineteen studies distinguished MCI from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). Additionally, we found large amounts of heterogeneity across studies which could be partially attributed to variations in DL methods and imaging modalities.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that DL-assisted [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET imaging has high diagnostic performance in identifying AD. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the necessity for future research to incorporate external validation, utilize large sample size, and adhere to rigorous guideline to provide robust support for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07228-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to calculate the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL)-assisted 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
Methods
The Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore databases were searched for related studies from inception to May 24, 2024. We included original studies that developed a DL algorithm for [18F]FDG PET imaging to assess diagnostic performance in classifying AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal control (NC). A bivariate random-effects model was employed to assess the area under the curve (AUC).
Results
We identified 36 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 35 studies distinguished AD from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99). Thirteen studies distinguished AD from MCI, with a pooled AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). Nineteen studies distinguished MCI from NC, with a pooled AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). Additionally, we found large amounts of heterogeneity across studies which could be partially attributed to variations in DL methods and imaging modalities.
Conclusion
This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that DL-assisted [18F]FDG PET imaging has high diagnostic performance in identifying AD. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the necessity for future research to incorporate external validation, utilize large sample size, and adhere to rigorous guideline to provide robust support for clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.