Boreal Tree Growth May Be More Tolerant to Warming Than Previously Considered: Implications for Future Modelling Studies

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Jiejie Wang, Anthony R. Taylor, Chris Hennigar, Loïc D'Orangeville
{"title":"Boreal Tree Growth May Be More Tolerant to Warming Than Previously Considered: Implications for Future Modelling Studies","authors":"Jiejie Wang,&nbsp;Anthony R. Taylor,&nbsp;Chris Hennigar,&nbsp;Loïc D'Orangeville","doi":"10.1111/geb.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Most process-based forest simulation models used to project the impacts of climate change on forest dynamics rely on thermal transfer functions (TTF) that describe the relationship between temperature and growth. However, these functions have faced criticism, undermining model forecasts and highlighting the need for more robust TTF based on large empirical datasets. In this study, we modelled growth response to growing degree-days (GDD) of common tree species in eastern North America using an unprecedented dataset of over 1 million tree records from 29,809 permanent sample plots.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Canada and the United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>1958–2018.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Tree species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used quantile regression analysis to build TTF by modelling tree growth response to GDD for 16 tree species using a widely distributed data across North America. The newly fitted TTF were then used to project near-term (2041–2070 time period) growth responses to climate warming and were compared with TTF currently applied in published modelling studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our results support the assumption of a parabolic growth response curve to GDD, but challenge the assumption of optimal growth occurring at the centre of the species' climatic range (as assumed by the climatic envelope approach commonly used to develop TTF). Compared to our empirically derived TTF, the TTF used in four well-established, published forest simulation models tend to overestimate the negative impact of climate warming on the growth of cold-adapted, boreal tree species, while underestimating it for some temperate species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results indicate that the selected published forest models often underestimate the optimum temperature under which maximum tree growth occurs for cold-adapted, boreal species, suggesting greater resilience to climate change than previously forecasted. We recommend the application of this empirical approach to other tree species and integrating these more realistic parameters into existing modelling frameworks to improve ecological forecasting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Most process-based forest simulation models used to project the impacts of climate change on forest dynamics rely on thermal transfer functions (TTF) that describe the relationship between temperature and growth. However, these functions have faced criticism, undermining model forecasts and highlighting the need for more robust TTF based on large empirical datasets. In this study, we modelled growth response to growing degree-days (GDD) of common tree species in eastern North America using an unprecedented dataset of over 1 million tree records from 29,809 permanent sample plots.

Location

Canada and the United States.

Time Period

1958–2018.

Major Taxa Studied

Tree species.

Methods

We used quantile regression analysis to build TTF by modelling tree growth response to GDD for 16 tree species using a widely distributed data across North America. The newly fitted TTF were then used to project near-term (2041–2070 time period) growth responses to climate warming and were compared with TTF currently applied in published modelling studies.

Results

Our results support the assumption of a parabolic growth response curve to GDD, but challenge the assumption of optimal growth occurring at the centre of the species' climatic range (as assumed by the climatic envelope approach commonly used to develop TTF). Compared to our empirically derived TTF, the TTF used in four well-established, published forest simulation models tend to overestimate the negative impact of climate warming on the growth of cold-adapted, boreal tree species, while underestimating it for some temperate species.

Main Conclusions

Our results indicate that the selected published forest models often underestimate the optimum temperature under which maximum tree growth occurs for cold-adapted, boreal species, suggesting greater resilience to climate change than previously forecasted. We recommend the application of this empirical approach to other tree species and integrating these more realistic parameters into existing modelling frameworks to improve ecological forecasting.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信