Peter Sykes, Carrie Innes, Rebecca Bell, Janine Nip, John McMenamin, Lynn McBain, Ben Hudson, Melanie Gibson, Sarah Te Whaiti, Alexandria Tino, Jonathan Williman, Andrew Miller, Beverley Lawton
{"title":"Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Screening With Universal Access to Vaginal Self-Testing: Outcomes of an Implementation Trial","authors":"Peter Sykes, Carrie Innes, Rebecca Bell, Janine Nip, John McMenamin, Lynn McBain, Ben Hudson, Melanie Gibson, Sarah Te Whaiti, Alexandria Tino, Jonathan Williman, Andrew Miller, Beverley Lawton","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Determine the feasibility of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening that included the option of a vaginal swab HPV test (<i>vaginal self-test</i>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>17 primary care practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population or Sample</h3>\n \n <p>People due for a cervical screening test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants could choose a clinician-taken <i>cervical test</i> or a <i>vaginal self-test</i> (undertaken in clinic or at home), unless a cervical co-test (HPV and cytology) was clinically indicated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Proportion of participants who had (a) a <i>vaginal self-test</i>, (b) an HPV-detected result and (c) HPV detected on a <i>vaginal self-test</i> and returned for further investigation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>3121 people were enrolled. Participation rates were high for people of all recorded ethnicities. A <i>vaginal self-test</i> was undertaken by 95% (2954/3121, 95% confidence interval [CI] [93.8, 95.4]) of people. HPV was detected in 12.9% (404/3121, 95% CI [11.8, 14.2]) of people. 95% (384/404, 95% CI [92.5, 97.0]) of people with HPV detected had follow-up cytology or colposcopy. 2.6% (82/3121, 95% CI [2.1, 3.2]) had HPV 16/18 detected, all of whom attended colposcopy. Cytology triage was completed for 92% (276/301, 95% CI [88.0, 94.3]) of people with non-16/18 HPV types (<i>HPV other</i>) detected on a <i>vaginal self-test.</i> This varied by ethnicity and screening history.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study confirms the feasibility of cervical screening with the universal option of a <i>vaginal self-test</i> and demonstrated a clear preference for the <i>vaginal self-test</i>. Challenges remain in relation to equitable provision of cytology triage. Ongoing programme monitoring is imperative.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register. ANZCTR Reference number: ACTRN12622000699763 (https://anzctr.org.au/)</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 9","pages":"1240-1249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18159","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Determine the feasibility of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening that included the option of a vaginal swab HPV test (vaginal self-test).
Design
Implementation trial.
Setting
17 primary care practices.
Population or Sample
People due for a cervical screening test.
Methods
Participants could choose a clinician-taken cervical test or a vaginal self-test (undertaken in clinic or at home), unless a cervical co-test (HPV and cytology) was clinically indicated.
Main Outcome Measures
Proportion of participants who had (a) a vaginal self-test, (b) an HPV-detected result and (c) HPV detected on a vaginal self-test and returned for further investigation.
Results
3121 people were enrolled. Participation rates were high for people of all recorded ethnicities. A vaginal self-test was undertaken by 95% (2954/3121, 95% confidence interval [CI] [93.8, 95.4]) of people. HPV was detected in 12.9% (404/3121, 95% CI [11.8, 14.2]) of people. 95% (384/404, 95% CI [92.5, 97.0]) of people with HPV detected had follow-up cytology or colposcopy. 2.6% (82/3121, 95% CI [2.1, 3.2]) had HPV 16/18 detected, all of whom attended colposcopy. Cytology triage was completed for 92% (276/301, 95% CI [88.0, 94.3]) of people with non-16/18 HPV types (HPV other) detected on a vaginal self-test. This varied by ethnicity and screening history.
Conclusion
This study confirms the feasibility of cervical screening with the universal option of a vaginal self-test and demonstrated a clear preference for the vaginal self-test. Challenges remain in relation to equitable provision of cytology triage. Ongoing programme monitoring is imperative.
Trial Registration
Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register. ANZCTR Reference number: ACTRN12622000699763 (https://anzctr.org.au/)
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.