CONSORT 2010 extension: setting standards for reporting cluster randomised crossover trials

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r637
Joanne E McKenzie
{"title":"CONSORT 2010 extension: setting standards for reporting cluster randomised crossover trials","authors":"Joanne E McKenzie","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extending the CONSORT 2010 statement for reporting cluster randomised crossover trials lays the foundation for improving the completeness and accuracy of reporting Over the past two decades my research has centred on systematic reviews. Developing and evaluating statistical and research methodology for reviews has been a focus, but I have also collaborated on many reviews. These collaborations inevitably reveal the importance of complete, clear, and accurate reporting of primary studies. At best, incomplete and inaccurate reporting wastes research investment—often substantial in the case of large randomised trials—and at worst, it may lead to incorrect conclusions with far reaching consequences. Primary studies that are reported well contribute maximally to the evidence base and can be fairly assessed. The opposite is true when reporting is unclear or incomplete. I have spent countless hours scouring trial reports for information that should be present but is not; trying to decipher unclear text; or trying to decide what to do when the information reported is inconsistent within or across reports of the same study. This time adds up and …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extending the CONSORT 2010 statement for reporting cluster randomised crossover trials lays the foundation for improving the completeness and accuracy of reporting Over the past two decades my research has centred on systematic reviews. Developing and evaluating statistical and research methodology for reviews has been a focus, but I have also collaborated on many reviews. These collaborations inevitably reveal the importance of complete, clear, and accurate reporting of primary studies. At best, incomplete and inaccurate reporting wastes research investment—often substantial in the case of large randomised trials—and at worst, it may lead to incorrect conclusions with far reaching consequences. Primary studies that are reported well contribute maximally to the evidence base and can be fairly assessed. The opposite is true when reporting is unclear or incomplete. I have spent countless hours scouring trial reports for information that should be present but is not; trying to decipher unclear text; or trying to decide what to do when the information reported is inconsistent within or across reports of the same study. This time adds up and …
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信