Identification of the key regulators of the soil carbon priming effect: A data synthesis

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Jianyu Tao, Xiaoyuan Liu
{"title":"Identification of the key regulators of the soil carbon priming effect: A data synthesis","authors":"Jianyu Tao, Xiaoyuan Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07409-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>The priming effect (PE) plays a crucial role in soil carbon (C) dynamics and the global C balance, yet its driving factors remain controversial.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Meta-analysis, boosted regression tree (BRT) model, and linear mixed model (LMM) were applied to investigate the effects of various abiotic factors on the PE.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Recalcitrant substance inputs may induce negative PEs in forest and grassland soils, which may become positive in extremely acidic soils (≤ 5.0). Moreover, PE intensities were higher when soil C/N ratios were below 10 or substrate C/N ratios were below 20. According to the BRT model, substrate C input, SOC content, soil C/N ratio, and soil pH were identified as the primary determinants of the PE, explaining 65% of the total variation (each contributing &gt; 10%). Moreover, substrate C input was positively correlated with PE intensity when the impacts of soil moisture, temperature, pH, C/N ratio, and substrate N/C ratio were separated as random effects in the LMM. The total random effect of soil pH and C/N ratio (39.7%) exceeded the total fixed effect of substrate C input and SOC (38.6%), highlighting their role as key regulators of the PE.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This study offers novel insights into the mechanisms of the PE by shifting the focus from soil microbial processes to the regulatory effects of abiotic factors on soil microbial activity and growth. To quantitively estimate the effects of PEs on soil C dynamics, multivariate models should be employed in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07409-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

The priming effect (PE) plays a crucial role in soil carbon (C) dynamics and the global C balance, yet its driving factors remain controversial.

Methods

Meta-analysis, boosted regression tree (BRT) model, and linear mixed model (LMM) were applied to investigate the effects of various abiotic factors on the PE.

Results

Recalcitrant substance inputs may induce negative PEs in forest and grassland soils, which may become positive in extremely acidic soils (≤ 5.0). Moreover, PE intensities were higher when soil C/N ratios were below 10 or substrate C/N ratios were below 20. According to the BRT model, substrate C input, SOC content, soil C/N ratio, and soil pH were identified as the primary determinants of the PE, explaining 65% of the total variation (each contributing > 10%). Moreover, substrate C input was positively correlated with PE intensity when the impacts of soil moisture, temperature, pH, C/N ratio, and substrate N/C ratio were separated as random effects in the LMM. The total random effect of soil pH and C/N ratio (39.7%) exceeded the total fixed effect of substrate C input and SOC (38.6%), highlighting their role as key regulators of the PE.

Conclusions

This study offers novel insights into the mechanisms of the PE by shifting the focus from soil microbial processes to the regulatory effects of abiotic factors on soil microbial activity and growth. To quantitively estimate the effects of PEs on soil C dynamics, multivariate models should be employed in future studies.

土壤碳启动效应关键调控因子的识别:数据综合
背景与目的引物效应(PE)在土壤碳(C)动态和全球碳平衡中起着至关重要的作用,但其驱动因素仍存在争议。方法应用元分析、提升回归树(BRT)模型和线性混合模型(LMM)研究各种非生物因素对引物效应的影响。结果韧性物质输入可能会引起森林和草地土壤的负引物效应,在极酸性土壤(≤ 5.0)中可能变为正引物效应。此外,当土壤 C/N 比值低于 10 或基质 C/N 比值低于 20 时,PE 强度更高。根据 BRT 模型,基质 C 输入量、SOC 含量、土壤 C/N 比和土壤 pH 值被确定为 PE 的主要决定因素,解释了总变化的 65%(各占 10%)。此外,当在 LMM 中将土壤水分、温度、pH 值、C/N 比和基质 N/C 比的影响作为随机效应分离时,基质 C 输入量与 PE 强度呈正相关。土壤 pH 值和 C/N 比的总随机效应(39.7%)超过了基质 C 输入量和 SOC 的总固定效应(38.6%),凸显了它们作为 PE 关键调节因子的作用。为了定量估计 PE 对土壤 C 动态的影响,今后的研究应采用多元模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信